The effects of visual input on postural control of the lumbar spine in unstable sitting.

Postural control of the lumbar spine in unstable sitting was quantified through the analysis of the center of pressure (CoP) movement recorded by a force plate situated underneath a seat that incorporated a hemisphere. Thirteen healthy subjects were tested under conditions of increasing seat instability and elimination of visual input. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative effects of visual input and support surface instability on open and closed loop postural control mechanisms in sitting and to determine the association between traditional summary statistics and random walk analysis of CoP movement. The effects of the seat instability level and visual input on the CoP movement parameters were tested with a two-factor, repeated measures ANOVA (p<0.01). In all summary statistics CoP movement parameters increased significantly due to the seat instability level and lack of visual input. The random walk analysis identified two regions, short- and long-term, which has been postulated to represent open and closed loop control mechanism, respectively. While short-term scaling exponents were independent from visual input, CoP displacement in the short-term region was significantly increased in the eyes closed condition. Summary statistic of CoP total path length per second correlated highly with critical point coordinates and short-term diffusion coefficients. The CoP movement in the long-term region was consistent with a closed loop control mechanisms. The findings of visual influence on what is assumed as an open-loop control mechanism does not, at face value, support the hypothesis that two separate mechanisms are working to achieve postural control.

Trunk muscle recruitment patterns in patients with low back pain enhance the stability of the lumbar spine.

STUDY DESIGN: A comparative study of trunk muscle recruitment patterns in healthy control subjects and patients with chronic low back pain was conducted. OBJECTIVE: To assess trunk muscle recruitment in patients with low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Conflicting evidence has been reported on the level and pattern of trunk muscle recruitment in patients with low back pain. The disparities can be explained partly by methodologic differences. It was hypothesized that trunk muscle recruitment patterns may be altered in patients with low back pain to compensate for reduced spinal stability. METHODS: For this study, 16 patients with low back pain and 16 matched control subjects performed slow trunk motions about the neutral posture and isometric ramp contractions while seated upright. Ratios of electromyographic amplitudes and estimated moment contributions of antagonist over agonist muscles and of segmentally inserting muscles over muscles inserting on the thorax and pelvis only were calculated. In addition, model simulations were performed to assess the effect of changes in muscle recruitment on spinal stability. RESULTS: The ratios of antagonist over agonist, and of lumbar over thoracic erector spinae electromyographic amplitude and estimated moment contributions were greater in the patients than in the control subjects. The simulation model predicted that these changes would effectively increase spinal stability. CONCLUSIONS: Trunk muscle recruitment patterns in patients with low back pain are different from those in healthy control subjects. The differences are likely to be functional with respect to enhancement of spinal stability in the patients.

Neuromuscular function in athletes following recovery from a recent acute low back injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Observational case control design. OBJECTIVES: To examine muscle response to sudden trunk loading in athletes with and without a recent history of acute low back injury (LBI). BACKGROUND: Impaired neuromuscular function is associated with chronic low back pain. This study examined whether such impairment persists after recovery from an acute LBI. METHODS AND MEASURES: Seventeen athletes who had a recent history of acute LBI and 17 matched healthy controls were tested. At the time of testing (mean = 56 days postinjury, range = 7-120 days postinjury), all athletes were symptom free and had returned to regular competition. Subjects performed isometric exertions in trunk flexion, extension, and left and right lateral bending against a trunk restraining cable. Upon reaching the target isometric force, the cable was released to impose sudden loading on the lumbar spine. Surface EMG signals from 12 major trunk muscles were recorded. The shut-off and switch-on latencies and number of muscles responding to sudden loading were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: In all 4 testing directions, the athletes with a recent history of acute LBI shut off significantly fewer muscles and did so with delayed latency. On average, the injured subjects shut off 4.0 out of 6.0 (SD = 1.3) muscles compared to 4.6 out of 6.0 (SD = 1.3) muscles in the control group. The average muscle shut-off latency was 71 (SD = 31) milliseconds for the injured and 50 (SD = 21) milliseconds for the control subjects. No differences were found in number or latency of muscles switching on. CONCLUSIONS: These objective measures of neuromuscular function indicated an altered muscle response pattern to sudden trunk loading in athletes following their clinical recovery from a recent acute LBI.

Can increased intra-abdominal pressure in humans be decoupled from trunk muscle co-contraction during steady state isometric exertions?

The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) can be achieved without elevating the overall trunk muscle co-contraction that causes increased spine compression force. Ten subjects performed isometric trunk flexion, extension, and lateral bending exertions while generating 0%, 40% and 80% of their maximal IAP or while co-contracting trunk muscles without consciously raising IAP. An additional three subjects performed a variety of ramp IAP, co-contraction and isometric exertion tasks while holding their breaths and while exhaling. An 18 degree-of-freedom, electromyogram (EMG)-assisted biomechanical model was used to quantify trunk muscle co-contraction with calculations of spine compression force and stability. Spine stability and compression force increased proportionally with increased IAP regardless of whether the subjects intentionally generated IAP or consciously avoided it. This increase was accomplished with significantly greater co-contraction of 12 major trunk muscles. The EMG activation of all muscles was highly correlated with IAP and intra-thoracic pressure (ITP) ( r from 0.59 to 0.95). Activity of the thoracic erector spinae correlated the best with ITP ( r=0.81), which in turn was correlated with IAP ( r=0.91). It was not possible to co-contract trunk muscles without generating IAP and ITP, or conversely to generate IAP without trunk muscle co-contraction and increased ITP.