Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Jt Dis Relat Surg ; 33(1): 33-39, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35361078

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to identify anatomical variants of the proximal tibia shaft and to develop a novel classification system for proximal tibia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 2019 and April 2020, a total of 200 patients with standard knee anteroposterior radiographs were included in this study. We measured the inner diameter of the tibia 16 cm distally from the tibial plateau and 3 cm distally from the tibial spine. The ratio between these two measurements was applied as the novel index ratio. RESULTS: A total number of 197 patients (100 males and 97 females) with a median age of 68 years (range, 21 to 89 years) were included in the final analysis. According to the 25th and 75th percentiles, three groups were clustered for each sex. A higher distribution of the type B pattern was found in female and male patients. However, type A with a narrow inner diaphyseal diameter was less common in female patients. The median intraobserver reliability for rater 1 was 0.998. The inter-observer reliability was high (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.998). There was a moderate correlation between the anteroposterior (AP) diameter and height (r=0.568) and a low correlation between the AP diameter and weight (r=0.376). The novel index shows no significant correlation between the index ratio and height (r=0.082), weight (r=0.014) or body mass index (r=-0.038). CONCLUSION: The novel classification presents three different types of tibia for each sex: type C has a wider inner diaphyseal diameter compared to type A with a narrow inner diaphyseal diameter. Type B has the widest distribution among the subjects.


Subject(s)
Femur , Tibia , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Radiography , Reproducibility of Results , Tibia/diagnostic imaging , Young Adult
2.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 142(2): 315-322, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33638676

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In our previous studies, we were able to identify anatomical differences as a predictor for aseptic loosening following primary and revision surgery with the use of rotating hinge prosthesis. This study was performed to answer following question: can a novel radiological classification system of the distal femur be identified? MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 200 patients who received standardized anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views of the knee joint were included in this study. On AP radiographs, we measured the distance between inner diameter of the femur at 20 cm proximally from the knee and at a point 2 cm proximally from the adductor tubercle. The ratio of the inner diameter of the femoral canal at 20 cm proximal of knee joint to the inner diameter of medullary canal at 2 cm proximal of adductor tubercle was used as a novel index ratio. Two observers blindly and independently reviewed the anteroposterior radiographs twice. RESULTS: Three groups of anatomical classification can be constructed for each sex according to the 25th and 75th percentiles. A higher distribution of Type C was found in female patients. The median intra-observer reliability for rater 1 was 0.995 (IQR 0.994-0.997). We had also a high inter-observer reliability with ICC of 0.997 (95% CI 0.996-0.998). CONCLUSIONS: The novel classification presents three different types of the knee joint for male and female patients. Type C has a wider inner diaphyseal diameter compared to Type A with a narrow inner diaphyseal diameter.


Subject(s)
Femur , Knee Prosthesis , Female , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Femur/surgery , Humans , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Knee Joint/surgery , Male , Radiography , Reproducibility of Results
4.
J Arthroplasty ; 35(8): 2200-2203, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32247671

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recently, a revised definition of the minor criteria scoring system for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) was developed by the second International Consensus Meeting on musculoskeletal infection. The new system combines preoperative and intraoperative findings, reportedly achieving high sensitivity and specificity. We aimed to validate the modified scoring system at a high-volume center. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent a revision total hip or knee arthroplasty at our institution from May 2015 to August 2018. Serum C-reactive protein, synovial white blood cell count and polymorphonuclear percentage, leukocyte esterase test, alpha-defensin, microbiological and histologic results, and documented existence of sinus tract and intraoperative purulence were available for all patients. Cases with at least 1 major criterion were considered as infected. Using the new minor criteria, a score of ≥6 reflects PJI, while a score <3 can be considered as noninfected. Sensitivity, specificity, mean accuracy (ACC), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 345 cases were included. A cutoff score of ≥6 points had the following diagnostic performance: area under the curve (AUC) = 0.90; ACC = 0.88; sensitivity = 0.96; specificity = 0.84; PPV = 0.70; NPV = 0.98. Diagnostic performance was better for the hip (AUC = 0.92; ACC = 0.90; sensitivity = 0.96; specificity = 0.86; PPV = 0.81; NPV = 0.98) than the knee (AUC = 0.89; ACC = 0.85; sensitivity = 0.95; specificity = 0.83; PPV = 0.59; NPV = 0.98). CONCLUSION: The modified scoring system proposed by the 2018 International Consensus Meeting in diagnosing PJI showed high sensitivity and a good performance, especially as rule-out diagnostic criteria. The cutoff level seems to be different between the hip and knee. Further validation studies considering the acknowledged limitations are recommended.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Prosthesis-Related Infections , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Biomarkers , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Consensus , Humans , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis , Prosthesis-Related Infections/epidemiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Synovial Fluid/chemistry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...