The obesity paradox: effect of body mass index on 2-years clinical outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in Indonesia.

OBJECTIVE: Several studies demonstrated that a high body mass index (BMI) might actually benefit patients with cardiovascular disease, including coronary heart disease. However, other studies were unable to confirm this paradoxical phenomenon in all populations. Therefore, this study aims to determine the association between BMI and long-term clinical outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 400 STEMI patients undergoing PCI. Clinical outcome evaluation was done by face-to-face or phone interview and collecting objective data. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the outcomes between underweight-normal group with overweight-obese group. RESULTS: The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was lower in patients with higher BMI group in 2-years evaluation (24.1% vs. 39.9%; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that BMI was an independent predictor of MACE and the incidence of recurrent infarction (OR 2.322 [CI 95% 1.505-3.584; p < 0.001]). The risk of MACE reduces as the weight increases, with a nadir of risk reduction for MACE at 28 to 29.0 kg/m2, in which the curve rises after, but remained below the risk associated with BMI of 23 kg/m2. CONCLUSIONS: In our population, patients with high BMI have a lower incidence of long-term MACE, especially recurrent myocardial infarction, in patients with STEMI undergoing PCI.

Survival analysis of patients with rheumatic MS after PBMV compared with MVS in a low-to-middle-income country.

INTRODUCTION: Rheumatic mitral stenosis continues to be prevalent in developing countries, notably in endemic areas. Over the last few decades, percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty (PBMV) has been established as a lower-cost alternative treatment for mitral stenosis (MS) in low-to-middle-income countries. PBMV has also been suggested to be an effective and safe alternative treatment modality. This study aims to analyse the survival of rheumatic MS patients treated with PBMV compared with those treated with mitral valve surgery (MVS). METHODS: This study was a national, single-centre, longitudinal study using a survival analysis method in 329 consecutive patients suffering from rheumatic heart disease with severe MS who underwent PBMV compared with 142 consecutive patients with similar characteristics who underwent MVS between January 2011 and December 2016. Survival analysis and event-free duration were determined over a median follow-up of 24 months in the PBMV group and 27 months in the MVS group. RESULTS: The results showed that of the 329 consecutive patients in the PBMV group, 61 patients (18.5) had an event (6 patients died and 55 patients were hospitalised), and of the 142 consecutive patients in the MVS group, 19 patients (13.4%) had an event (5 patients died, and 14 patients were hospitalised). The hazard ratio was 0.631 (95% confidence interval, 0.376-1.058; P = 0.081). Longer short-term survival was found in the MVS group but was not statistically significant. Event-free survival was significantly longer in the MVS group (P = 0.002), by 5 months. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the efficacy and safety of PBMV was reconfirmed, as PBMV proved to be non-inferior to MVS in survival prognosis, but sustained event-free duration was significantly better in the MVS group than in the PBMV group.