Impact of Size Matching on Survival Post Heart Transplant in Infants: Estimated Total Cardiac Volume Ratio Outperforms Donor-Recipient Weight Ratio.

PURPOSE: Cardiac volume-based estimation offers an alternative to donor-recipient weight ratio (DRWR) in pediatric heart transplantation (HT), but has not been correlated to post-transplant outcomes We sought to determine whether estimated Total Cardiac Volume (eTCV) ratio is associated with HT survival in infants. METHODS: The UNOS database was used to identify infants (age:<1year) who received HT in 1987-2020. Donor and recipient eTCV were calculated from weight using previously published data. Patient cohort was divided according to the significant range of eTCV ratio; characteristics and survival were compared. RESULTS: 2845 infants were identified. Hazard ratio with cubic spline showed prognostic relationship of eTCV ratio and DRWR with the overall survival. The cut-point method determined an optimal eTCV ratio range predictive of infant survival was 1.05-1.85 whereas no range for DRWR was predictive. 75.6% patients had an optimal TCV ratio, while 18.1% were in the lower (LR) and 6.3% in the higher (HR) group. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed better survival for patients within the optimal vs LR (p=0.0017), and a similar significantly better survival when compared to HR (p=0.0053). The optimal eTCV ratio group (n=2151) had DRWR ranging from 1.09-5; 34.3% had DRWR 2-3, and 5.0% DRWR>3. CONCLUSION: Currently, an upper DRWR limit has not been established in infants. Therefore, determining the optimal eTCV range is important to identifying an upper limit that significantly predicts survival benefit. This finding suggests a potential increase in donor pool for infant recipients since over 40% of donors in the optimal eTCV range includes DRWR values>2 that are traditionally not considered for candidate listing.

Use of Magnets as a Minimally Invasive Approach for Anastomosis in Esophageal Atresia: Long-Term Outcomes.

Introduction: The majority of esophageal atresia (EA) patients undergo surgical repair soon after birth. However, factors due to patient characteristics, esophageal length, or surgical complications can limit the ability to obtain esophageal continuity. A number of techniques have been described to treat these patients with "long-gap" EA. Magnets are a nonsurgical alternative for esophageal anastomosis. The purpose of this study was to report long-term outcomes for the use of magnets in EA. Materials and Methods: Between July 2001 and December 2017, 13 patients underwent placement of a magnetic catheter-based system under fluoroscopic guidance at six institutions. Daily chest radiographs were obtained until there was union of the magnets. Magnets were then removed and replaced with an oro- or nasogastric tube. Complications and outcomes were recorded. The average length of follow-up was 9.3 years (range 1.42-17.75). Results: A total of 85% of the patients had type A, pure EA, and 15% had type C with previous fistula ligation. The average length of time to achieve anastomosis was 6.3 days (range 3-13). No anastomotic leaks occurred, and all of the patients had an expected esophageal stenosis that required dilation given the 10F coupling surface of the magnets (average 9.8, range 3-22). Six patients (46%) had retrievable esophageal stents, and two underwent surgery; yet all maintained their native esophagus without interposition. A total of 92% were on full oral feeds at the time of follow-up. Conclusion: The use of magnets for treatment of long-gap EA is safe and feasible and accomplished good long-term outcomes. The main complication was esophageal stricture, although all patients maintained their native esophagus. A prospective observational study is currently enrolling patients to evaluate the safety and benefit of a catheter-based magnetic device for EA.

HIV among women and children in Pakistan.

The HIV epidemic in Pakistan has now transmitted to female spouses of HIV-positive injection drug users (IDUs) and bisexual men, and to preadolescent children through vertical transmission. Owing to sociocultural barriers, HIV-infected pregnant women and children do not have optimum access to treatment, hindering the prevention of HIV transmission.