The optimal gestational age to deliver patients with chronic hypertension on antihypertensive therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the optimal gestational age of planned delivery in pregnancies complicated by chronic hypertension requiring antihypertensive medications that minimizes the risk of adverse perinatal events and maternal morbidity. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies after 37 weeks of gestation complicated by chronic hypertension on antihypertensive medication, delivered at 7 hospitals within an academic health system in New York from 12/1/2015 to 9/3/2020. Two comparisons were made (1) planned deliveries at 37-376/7 weeks versus expectant management, (2) planned deliveries at 38-386/7 weeks versus expectant management. Patients with other maternal or fetal conditions were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse perinatal outcomes including stillbirth, neonatal death, assisted ventilation, cord pH < 7.0, 5-minute Apgar ≤5, diagnosis of respiratory disorder, and neonatal seizures. The secondary outcomes included preeclampsia, eclampsia, primary cesarean delivery, postpartum readmission, and infant stay greater than 5 days. Odds ratios were estimated with multiple logistic regression and adjusted for confounding effects. RESULTS: A total of 555 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients who underwent planned delivery at 37 weeks compared to expectant management did not appear to be at higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes (14.9% vs 10.4%, aOR 1.49, 95% CI: 0.77-2.88). Similarly, we did not find a difference in the primary outcome in patients who underwent planned delivery at 38 weeks versus those expectantly managed (9.7% vs 10.1%, (aOR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.39-1.76). There were no differences in the rates of primary cesarean or preeclampsia at 37 and 38 weeks. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that there is no difference in neonatal or maternal outcomes for chronic hypertensive patients on medication if delivery is planned or expectantly managed at 37 or 38 weeks' gestation.

The Risk of Readmission after Early Postpartum Discharge during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether early postpartum discharge during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was associated with a change in the odds of maternal postpartum readmissions. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective analysis of uncomplicated postpartum low-risk women in seven obstetrical units within a large New York health system. We compared the rate of postpartum readmissions within 6 weeks of delivery between two groups: low-risk women who had early postpartum discharge as part of our protocol during the COVID-19 pandemic (April 1-June 15, 2020) and similar low-risk patients with routine postpartum discharge from the same study centers 1 year prior. Statistical analysis included the use of Wilcoxon's rank-sum and chi-squared tests, Nelson-Aalen cumulative hazard curves, and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 8,206 patients included, 4,038 (49.2%) were patients who had early postpartum discharge during the COVID-19 pandemic and 4,168 (50.8%) were patients with routine postpartum discharge prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. The rates of postpartum readmissions after vaginal delivery (1.0 vs. 0.9%; adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-1.45) and cesarean delivery (1.5 vs. 1.9%; adjusted OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.29-1.45) were similar between the two groups. Demographic risk factors for postpartum readmission included Medicaid insurance and obesity. CONCLUSION: Early postpartum discharge during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with no change in the odds of maternal postpartum readmissions after low-risk vaginal or cesarean deliveries. Early postpartum discharge for low-risk patients to shorten hospital length of stay should be considered in the face of public health crises. KEY POINTS: · Early postpartum discharge was not associated with an increase in odds of hospital readmissions after vaginal delivery.. · Early postpartum discharge was not associated with an increase in odds of hospital readmissions after cesarean delivery.. · Early postpartum discharge for low-risk patients should be considered during a public health crisis..

Cerclage in singleton gestations with an extremely short cervix (≤10 mm) and no history of spontaneous preterm birth.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the efficacy of a cervical cerclage for preterm birth prevention in patients with a short cervix and no history of spontaneous preterm birth are limited and inconclusive. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether cervical cerclage is associated with an increased time interval to delivery in asymptomatic patients with singleton pregnancies with an extremely short cervical length (≤10 mm) and no history of spontaneous preterm birth. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of asymptomatic patients with singleton pregnancies with a cervical length of ≤10 mm between 16 and 23 weeks' gestation from January 2014 to December 2019. Patients with previous spontaneous preterm birth, symptoms of preterm labor, cervical dilation of >1 cm, pessary, major fetal structural malformations, or missing data were excluded from the study. The primary outcome of time interval from diagnosis to delivery was compared between those who had a cervical cerclage after diagnosis and those who did not. The secondary outcomes included gestational age at delivery and adverse neonatal outcomes. Moreover, a subgroup analysis of all outcomes in patients already being treated with vaginal progesterone in each group was performed. Statistical analysis included chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and a multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression for time interval to delivery. RESULTS: Of the 90 patients included in the study, 52 (57.8%) had cervical cerclage, of which 35 (67.3%) were already being treated with progesterone. Moreover, 38 patients (42.2%) did not have cervical cerclage, of which 21 (55.3%) were already being treated with progesterone. Patients in the cervical cerclage group had an earlier gestational age (21.0 vs 22.0 weeks' gestation; P≤.001) and shorter cervical length (5 vs 7 mm; P=.002) at the diagnosis of a short cervix (cervical length≤10 mm) than those who did not have a cerclage. Cervical cerclage was associated with a longer time interval to delivery (17.0 vs 15.0 weeks; P=.02) and lower hazard of earlier delivery after diagnosis (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.99; P=.04) than no cerclage, after accounting for gestational age and cervical length at diagnosis. In patients already treated with progesterone, cervical cerclage was also associated with a longer time interval to delivery (17.0 vs 13.1 weeks; P=.01) and a lower hazard of earlier delivery after diagnosis (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.87; P=.02) compared to those with no cerclage. Late preterm birth was less common in patients with a cervical cerclage compared with those with no cervical cerclage (11.5% vs 31.6%; P=.03). CONCLUSION: Cervical cerclage should be considered in asymptomatic patients with an extremely short cervical length (≤10 mm) and no history of spontaneous preterm birth.

Early postpartum discharge during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Objectives To report our experience with early postpartum discharge to decrease hospital length of stay among low-risk puerperium patients in a large obstetrical service during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York. Methods Retrospective analysis of all uncomplicated postpartum women in seven obstetrical units within a large health system between December 8th, 2019 and June 20th, 2020. Women were stratified into two groups based on date of delivery in relation to the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York (Mid-March 2020); those delivering before or during the COVID-19 pandemic. We compared hospital length of stay, defined as time interval from delivery to discharge in hours, between the two groups and correlated it with the number of COVID-19 admissions to our hospitals. Statistical analysis included use of Wilcoxon rank sum test and Chi-squared test with significance defined as p-value<0.05. Results Of the 11,770 patients included, 5,893 (50.1%) delivered prior to and 5,877 (49.9%) delivered during the COVID-19 pandemic. We detected substantial shortening in postpartum hospital length of stay after vaginal delivery (34 vs. 48 h, p≤0.0001) and cesarean delivery (51 vs. 74 h, p≤0.0001) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions We report successful implementation of early postpartum discharge for low-risk patients resulting in a significantly shorter hospital stay during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York. The impact of this strategy on resource utilization, patient satisfaction and adverse outcomes requires further study.

Does cervical cerclage decrease preterm birth in twin pregnancies with a short cervix?

PURPOSE: To determine if use of cerclage in twin gestations with mid-trimester short cervix is associated with decreased preterm birth rate. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort of twin gestations identified with cervical length of ≤2.5 cm before 24 weeks of gestation through the perinatal ultrasound database of two institutions from 2008 to 2014. Patients with and without cerclage were compared for a primary outcome of preterm birth at <35 weeks. A pre-planned sub-group analysis of patients with cervical length ≤1.5 cm was also performed. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were included; 43 received cerclage, 39 did not. Mean gestational age at cerclage placement was 20.8 weeks. There was no significant difference in rate of preterm birth <35 weeks between the groups (34.9% versus 48.7%, respectively). In the sub-group analysis of patients with cervical length ≤1.5 cm, there was a significant decreased risk of preterm birth <35 weeks [37% versus 71.4%; adjusted RR 0.49 (0.26-0.93)]. CONCLUSION: Cerclage placement for cervical length ≤2.5 cm in twin gestations did not decrease the rate of preterm birth at <35 weeks; however, cerclage placement for cervical length ≤1.5 cm was associated with a significantly decreased rate of preterm birth <35 weeks when compared to patients managed without cerclage.

Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in multiple pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cerclage is a surgical intervention involving placing a stitch around the uterine cervix. The suture material aims to prevent cervical shortening and opening, thereby reducing the risk of preterm birth. The effectiveness and safety of this procedure in multiple gestations remains controversial. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether the use of a cervical cerclage in multiple gestations, either at high risk of pregnancy loss based on just the multiple gestation (history-indicated cerclage), the ultrasound findings of 'short cervix' (ultrasound-indicated cerclage), or the physical exam changes in the cervix (physical exam-indicated cerclage), improves obstetrical and perinatal outcomes. The primary outcomes assessed were perinatal deaths, serious neonatal morbidity, and perinatal deaths and serious neonatal morbidity. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 June 2014) and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of cervical cerclage in multiple pregnancies. Quasi-RCTs and RCTs using a cluster-randomised design were eligible for inclusion (but none were identified). Studies using a cross-over design and those presented only as abstracts were not eligible for inclusion.We included studies comparing cervical cerclage with no cervical cerclage in multiple pregnancies.Studies comparing cervical stitch versus any other preventative therapy (e.g. progesterone) in multiple pregnancies, and studies involving comparisons between different cerclage protocols (history-indicated versus ultrasound-indicated versus physical exam-indicated cerclage) were also eligible for inclusion but none were identified. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias. Two review authors extracted data. Data were checked for accuracy. MAIN RESULTS: We included five trials, which in total randomised 1577 women, encompassing both singleton and multiple gestations. After excluding singletons, the final analysis included 128 women, of which 122 women had twin gestations, and six women had triplet gestations. Two trials (n = 73 women) assessed history-indicated cerclage, while three trials (n = 55 women) assessed ultrasound-indicated cerclage. The five trials were judged to be of average to above average quality, with three of the trials at unclear risk regarding selection and detection biases.Concerning the primary outcomes, when outcomes for cerclage were pooled together for all indications and compared with no cerclage, there was no statistically significant differences in perinatal deaths (19.2% versus 9.5%; risk ratio (RR) 1.74, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.92 to 3.28, five trials, n = 262), serious neonatal morbidity (15.8% versus 13.6%; average RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.13 to 7.10, three trials, n = 116), or composite perinatal death and neonatal morbidity (40.4% versus 20.3%; average RR 1.54, 95% CI 0.58 to 4.11, three trials, n = 116).Among the secondary outcomes, there were no significant differences between the cerclage and the no cerclage groups. To name a few, there were no significant differences among the following: preterm birth less than 34 weeks (average RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.44 to 3.06, four trials, n = 83), preterm birth less than 35 weeks (average RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.58 to 2.14, four trials, n = 83), low birthweight less than 2500 g (average RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.48, four trials, n = 172), very low birthweight less than 1500 g (average RR 1.42, 95% CI 0.52 to 3.85, four trials, n = 172), and respiratory distress syndrome (average RR 1.70, 95% CI 0.15 to 18.77, three trials, n = 116). There were also no significant differences between the cerclage and no cerclage groups when examining caesarean section (elective and emergency) (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.35, three trials, n = 77) and maternal side-effects (RR 3.92, 95% CI 0.17 to 88.67, one trial, n = 28).Examining the differences between prespecified subgroups, ultrasound-indicated cerclage was associated with an increased risk of low birthweight (average RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.83, Tau² = 0.01, I² = 15%, three trials, n = 98), very low birthweight (average RR 3.31, 95% CI 1.58 to 6.91, Tau² = 0, I² = 0%, three trials, n = 98), and respiratory distress syndrome (average RR 5.07, 95% CI 1.75 to 14.70, Tau² = 0, I² = 0%, three trials, n = 98). However, given the low number of trials, as well as substantial heterogeneity and subgroup differences, these data must be interpreted cautiously.No trials reported on long-term infant neurodevelopmental outcomes. There were no physical exam-indicated cerclages available for comparison among the studies included. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review is based on limited data from five small studies of average to above average quality. For multiple gestations, there is no evidence that cerclage is an effective intervention for preventing preterm births and reducing perinatal deaths or neonatal morbidity.

Effectiveness of 17-α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate on preterm birth prevention in women with history-indicated cerclage.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether 17-α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17P) reduces the incidence of preterm birth in women with a history-indicated cerclage. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of women who received a cerclage for a prior preterm birth, analyzed based on exposure to 17P. The primary outcome variable was delivery < 35 weeks. Secondary outcomes were preterm birth < 37, 32, 28, and 24 weeks; interval between cerclage placement and delivery; gestational age at delivery; and infant birth weight. RESULTS: Fourteen women received 17P and 80 did not. Baseline characteristics did not differ between these two groups. Preterm delivery at < 35 weeks did not differ between those who received 17P and those who did not (29% versus 15%, p = 0.46). There were no significant differences between the groups for any other outcome. CONCLUSION: 17P does not appear to have an effect on preterm birth < 35 weeks in women with a history-indicated cerclage.

Gestational age of previous twin preterm birth as a predictor for subsequent singleton preterm birth.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine an optimal gestational-age cutoff of preterm twin deliveries for predicting subsequent singleton preterm birth (PTB). STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective study of women with a spontaneous twin delivery who subsequently had a singleton gestation. Univariate and multivariate analyses determined the risk of a spontaneous singleton PTB after a PTB of a twin gestation. Different gestational-age cutoffs of the previous twin PTB were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 255 women, previous twin PTB at <34 weeks' gestation was associated with an increased risk of singleton PTB (odds ratio, 9.67; 95% confidence interval, 3.07-30.47). Every twin gestational age cutoff at <34 weeks' gestation had a significantly higher risk of subsequent singleton PTB, which was no longer significant at ≥ 34 weeks' gestation (odds ratio, 1.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-12.19). CONCLUSION: In women with a previous spontaneous twin PTB at <34 weeks' gestation, there is an increased risk of subsequent singleton PTB. A twin birth at ≥ 34 weeks' gestation is not associated with an increased risk for a subsequent singleton PTB.

The effect of 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate on preterm birth in women with an ultrasound-indicated cerclage.

We sought to determine if 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17P) reduces the rate of preterm birth (PTB) in women with an ultrasound-indicated cerclage (UIC). We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of women with a previous spontaneous PTB and current UIC placement for cervical length (CL) < 25 mm at < 23 (6)/ (7) weeks. The study group consisted of women treated with 17P; the control group consisted of women not treated with 17P. Primary outcome was spontaneous PTB < 35 weeks. Secondary outcomes included PTB < 32 weeks, PTB < 28 weeks, gestational age at delivery, and birth weight. A total of 58 women were identified; 15 (25.9%) received 17P, and 43 (74.1%) did not. 17P did not have a significant effect on PTB < 35 weeks (odds ratio 1.72, 95% confidence interval 0.50 to 5.89), nor did it have a significant effect on the secondary outcomes. Among women with a prior spontaneous PTB and current UIC for CL < 25 mm, 17P did not reduce the rate of PTB < 35 weeks.

Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography in women with singleton gestations and previous preterm birth: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate if cerclage prevents preterm birth and perinatal mortality and morbidity in women with previous preterm birth, singleton gestation, and short cervical length in a meta-analysis of randomized trials. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, PUBMED, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched using the terms "cerclage," "short cervix," "ultrasound," and "randomized trial." METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized trials of cerclage in women with short cervical length on transvaginal ultrasonography, limiting the analysis to women with previous spontaneous preterm birth and singleton gestation. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Patient-level data abstraction and analysis were accomplished by two independent investigators. Five trials met inclusion criteria. In women with a singleton gestation, previous spontaneous preterm birth, and cervical length less than 25 mm before 24 weeks of gestation, preterm birth before 35 weeks of gestation was 28.4% (71/250) in the cerclage compared with 41.3% (105/254) in the no cerclage groups (relative risk 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.55­ 0.89). Cerclage also significantly reduced preterm birth before 37, 32, 28, and 24 weeks of gestation. Composite perinatal mortality and morbidity were significantly reduced (15.6% in cerclage compared with 24.8% in no cerclage groups; relative risk 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.45­ 0.91). CONCLUSION: In women with previous spontaneous preterm birth, singleton gestation, and cervical length less than 25 mm, cerclage significantly prevents preterm birth and composite perinatal mortality and morbidity.

Is short stature associated with short cervical length?

We sought to estimate if there is a correlation between maternal height and cervical length in women at high risk for preterm birth. We studied a retrospective cohort of women with singleton gestation and risk factors for preterm birth. Maternal height was categorized as short (<157.5 cm) or not short stature (≥157.5 cm). Cervical length at 14 to 24 weeks was evaluated. Primary outcomes were incidence of initial cervical length <30 mm and incidence of shortest cervical length <25 mm. Four hundred sixteen women met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-two (22.6%) of the short women and 79 (24.5%) of the nonshort women had an initial cervical length <30 mm ( P = 0.81). Twenty-two (23.7%) of the short women and 104 (32.2%) of the nonshort women had a cervical length <25 mm for shortest cervical length measurement ( P = 0.15). In women with singleton gestation and risk factors for preterm birth, no statistically significant relationship exists between maternal height and initial or shortest cervical length.