Should IFN-γ, IL-17 and IL-2 be considered predictive biomarkers of acute rejection in liver and kidney transplant? Results of a multicentric study.

Acute rejection (AR) remains a major challenge in organ transplantation, and there is a need for predictive biomarkers. In the present multicenter study, we prospectively examined a series of biomarkers in liver and kidney recipients. Intracellular expression of IFN-γ, IL-17 and IL-2 and IL-17 soluble production were evaluated both pre-transplantation and post-transplantation (1st and 2nd week, 1st, 2nd and 3rd month). 142 transplant patients (63 liver/79 kidney) were included in the study. Twenty-eight recipients (14 liver/14 kidney) developed AR. Pre- and post-transplantation intracellular expression of %IFN-γ(+) in CD4(+)CD69(+) and in CD8(+)CD69(+) and soluble IL17 identified liver and kidney transplant patients at high risk of AR. Pre-transplantation, %IL-2(+) in CD8(+)CD69(+) also identified kidney patients at high risk. We constructed pre- and post-transplantation risk prediction models, based on a composite panel of biomarkers, which could provide the basis for future studies and will be a useful tool for the selection and adjustment of immunosuppressive treatments.

Intracellular IFN-γ and IL-2 expression monitoring as surrogate markers of the risk of acute rejection and personal drug response in de novo liver transplant recipients.

Biomarker monitoring is needed in transplantation to reflect individual response to immunosuppressive drugs and graft outcome. We evaluated intracellular expression and soluble production of interferon-(IFN)-γ and interleukin-(IL)-2 as predictive biomarkers of acute rejection (AR) and personal drug response. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic profiles were determined in 47 de novo liver recipients treated with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone. Of the 47 patients, AR occurred in nine. There were no differences in drug concentrations between rejectors and non-rejectors. A pre-transplantation cut-off value of 55.80% for %CD8(+)-IFN-γ(+) identified patients at high risk of AR with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 82%. In the first week post-transplantation, patients with a % inhibition for soluble IFN-γ, %CD8(+)-IFN-γ(+) and %CD8(+)-IL2(+) lower than 40% developed AR, showing low susceptibility to immunosuppressive drugs. Therefore, effector-T-cell response monitoring may help physicians to identify personal response to treatment and patients at high risk of AR.

How long should initiation of calcineurin inhibitors be delayed to protect renal function in liver transplantation?

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Delayed introduction of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) in liver transplantation (OLT) seeks to protect renal function, although the optimal length of the delay is not well established. The aim of this study was to analyze the effects on renal function of CNI initiation on different days after OLT. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 260 OLT recipients. Group D1-a (n = 36) underwent the standard initial immunosuppression at our center: namely, CNI introduction on day 1 with further daily administration to achieve target levels of 8 to 15 ng/mL for tacrolimus or 150 to 300 ng/mL for cyclosporine. Due to renal concerns, 126 patients (group D1-b) had CNI introduced on day 1 either not daily or at doses to achieve less than the target on at least two occasions. In 43 patients (group D2), CNI were introduced on day 2 in 23 on day 3 (group D3), in 12 on day 4 (group D4), and at least at day 5 in 20 others (group D5). In periods without CNI treatment, patients received mycophenolate mofetil. Steroids were administered to all patients. The study period included the first 3 months post-OLT. Renal function was estimated as creatinine clearance (CrCl) using the Cockcroft-Gault equation. RESULTS: Changes in CrCl from pre-OLT to month 3 were -19% ± 28% in group D1-a; -27% ± 19% in group D1-b; -29% ± 19% in group D2; -23% ± 26% in group D3; -4% ± 38% in group D4, and +4% ± 33% in group D5 (P < .05 vs groups D1-a, D1-b, D2, and D3). On multivariate analysis, CNI introduction at day ≥ 5 was protective for kidneys when adjusted for other variables that potentially influence renal function. CONCLUSION: CNI should be introduced at day 5 after OLT to protect renal function.