The Contribution of Staffing to Medication Administration Errors: A Text Mining Analysis of Incident Report Data.

PURPOSE: (a) To describe trigger terms that can be used to identify reports of inadequate staffing contributing to medication administration errors, (b) to identify such reports, (c) to compare the degree of harm within incidents with and without those triggers, and (d) to examine the association between the most commonly reported inadequate staffing trigger terms and the incidence of omission errors and "no harm" terms. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a retrospective study using descriptive statistical analysis, text mining, and manual analysis of free text descriptions of medication administration-related incident reports (N = 72,390) reported to the National Reporting and Learning System for England and Wales in 2016. METHODS: Analysis included identifying terms indicating inadequate staffing (manual analysis), followed by text parsing, filtering, and concept linking (SAS Text Miner tool). IBM SPSS was used to describe the data, compare degree of harm for incidents with and without triggers, and to compare incidence of "omission errors" and "no harm" among the inadequate staffing trigger terms. FINDINGS: The most effective trigger terms for identifying inadequate staffing were "short staffing" (n = 81), "workload" (n = 80), and "extremely busy" (n = 51). There was significant variation in omission errors across inadequate staffing trigger terms (Fisher's exact test = 44.11, p < .001), with those related to "workload" most likely to accompany a report of an omission, followed by terms that mention "staffing" and being "busy." Prevalence of "no harm" did not vary statistically between the trigger terms (Fisher's exact test = 11.45, p = 0.49), but the triggers "workload," "staffing level," "busy night," and "busy unit" identified incidents with lower levels of "no harm" than for incidents overall. CONCLUSIONS: Inadequate staffing levels, workload, and working in haste may increase the risk for omissions and other types of error, as well as for patient harm. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This work lays the groundwork for creating automated text-analytical systems that could analyze incident reports in real time and flag or monitor staffing levels and related medication administration errors.

Infection and wound breakdown in spontaneous second-degree perineal tears: An exploratory mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: Perineal trauma affects large numbers of women who have a vaginal birth. This study explores the incidence, etiology and women's experiences of wound infection/breakdown associated with spontaneous second degree tears. METHODS: This was an exploratory mixed methods study set in an urban tertiary National Health Service hospital in 2014-2015. The study included a prospective observational study of second-degree tears using electronic patient records. Infection was defined using criteria adapted from Public Health England's Surgical Site Infection Surveillance Service. We also did a case-control study of maternity records to explore factors associated with perineal infection/wound breakdown, and semi-structured interviews with a purposeful sample of women who experienced wound infection/breakdown. RESULTS: Of 2892 vaginal births during the study period, 76.8% sustained perineal trauma, with second-degree tears most commonly recorded (n = 828/28.6%). Sixteen (1.9%) had a documented infection/wound breakdown which were associated with "compromised wound status" (increased severity of wound/poor suturing; P = 0.033) Women complained of a lack of information about their perineum and poor postnatal surveillance by midwives and physicians. Diagnosis and treatment were often delayed by clinicians' reliance on external signs of wound infection. Although the sample size was small, there were no differences in rates of infection between sutured and unsutured second-degree tears. CONCLUSIONS: Although second-degree tears were common after vaginal birth, wound infection/breakdown was relatively uncommon. Women who report feeling unwell or develop pyrexia postnatally should be assessed urgently. A prospective longitudinal study exploring the long-term sequelae of second-degree tears is needed.

Strengthening health systems through nursing: evidence from 14 European countries

‘Who is a nurse?’ and ‘What is nursing?’ seem to be simple questions yet the answers are strangely elusive. This book explores the variations in structure and organization of the nursing workforce across the different countries of Europe. This diversity, and the reasons for it, are of more than academic interest. The work of nurses has always had a critical impact on patient outcomes. As health systems shift radically in response to rising demand, the role of nurses becomes even more important. This book is part of a two-volume study on the contributions that nurses make to strengthening health systems. This is the first time that the topic of nursing has been dealt with at length within the Observatory Health Policy Series. The aim is to raise the profile of nursing within health policy and draw the attention of decision-makers. Part 1 is a series of national case studies drawn from Belgium, England, Finland, Germany, Greece, Ireland, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland. The countries were chosen as the subject of a large EU-funded study of nursing (RN4Cast). Lithuania and Slovenia were added to provide broader geographical and policy reach. Part 2, to be published later this year, will provide thematic analysis of important policy issues such as quality of care, workforce planning, education and training, regulation and migration. The lessons learned from comparative case-study analysis demonstrate wide variation in every dimension of the workforce. It examines what a nurse is; nurse-to-doctor and nurse-to-population ratios; the education, regulation and issuing of credentials to nurses; and the planning of the workforce. While comparative analysis across countries brings these differences into sharp relief, it also reveals how the EU functions as an important ‘binding agent’, drawing these diverse elements together into a more coherent whole.

Nurses as change agents for a better future in health care: the politics of drift and dilution.

This paper takes the 70th Anniversary of the National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom as an opportunity to reflect upon the strategic direction of nursing policy and the extent to which nurses can realise their potential as change agents in building a better future for health care. It argues that the policy trajectory set for nursing at the outset of the NHS continues to influence its strategic direction, and that the trajectory needs to be reset with the voices of nurses being more engaged in the design, as much as the delivery of health policy. There is a growing evidence base about the benefits for patients and nurses of deploying well-educated nurses at the top of their skill set, to provide needed care for patients in adequately staffed and resourced units, as well as the value that nurses contribute to decision-making in clinical care. Yet much of this evidence is not being implemented. On the contrary, some of it is being ignored. Policy remains fragmented, driven by short-term financial constraints and underinvestment in high quality care. Nurses need to make their voices heard, and use the evidence base to change the dialogue with the public, policy makers and politicians, in order to build a better future for health care.