Role of doppler ultrasound in detecting vascular complications in recipients of living donor liver transplant (LDLT).

OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of Doppler ultrasound in the detection of vascular complications in recipients of living donor liver transplant, keeping contrast-enhanced computerised tomography of abdomen as the gold standard. METHODS: The retrospective study was conducted from February 16 to April 1, 2022, at the Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan, and comprised data of living donor liver transplant recipients who had undergone contrast-enhanced computerised tomography of abdomen within 24 hours of Doppler ultrasound between January 2021 and January 2022. For the diagnosis of hepatic vascular complications, the diagnostic values of Doppler ultrasound parameters were derived by correlating Doppler ultrasound findings with contrast-enhanced computerised tomography results. Data was analysed using SPSS 20. RESULTS: Of the 35 patients, 24(68.6%) were men and 11(31.4%) were women. The overall mean age was 45.86±13.8 years. For hepatic artery thrombosis, the use of Doppler ultrasound criteria yielded a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of 100%, 96.6%, 83.3%, 100%, and 97.1% respectively. For hepatic artery stenosis, overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of Doppler ultrasound was 100%, 96.8%, 75%, 100% and 97.1% respectively. Doppler ultrasound parameters resulted in a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of 100% each in detecting portal vein and hepatic venous outflow tract thrombosis. Overall, Doppler ultrasound sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy was found to be 100%, 88.8%, 89.4%, 100% and 94.2% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Doppler ultrasound was adequate to document vascular complications after living donor liver transplant in majority of the cases with high accuracy and sensitivity.

Segment IV hepatic artery in potential donors for living related liver transplantation: Evaluation with multi-detector CT.

OBJECTIVE: To assess segment IV hepatic arterial anatomy and its variation on multi-detector computed tomography in potential liver donors. METHODS: The retrospective study was conducted at Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad and comprised data of potential liver transplant donors related to the period between January 2012 and June 2017. Computed tomography scans were performed using multi-detector scanners. Images were transferred to work station for postprocessing and were analysed regarding the origination and variation of the arteries by two independent experienced radiologists. RESULTS: Of the 455 patients whose records were evaluated, 299(65.7%) were males and 156(34.3%) were females. Six types of segment IV artery were defined based on their points of origin: left hepatic artery 285(62.6%), right hepatic artery 111(24.4 %), proper hepatic artery 9(1.8 %), common hepatic artery 29(6.4%), gastro duodenal artery 3(0.7 %), and dual 18(4.1 %).313 of total cases (68.8%) had normal anatomy with no variation. Those with aberrant/variant anatomy constituted 142(31.2%) of the total. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-detector computed tomography angiography was found to be a fast, reliable and non-invasive technique that could evaluate normal as well as anatomical variants of segment IV arteries.

Prognostication of Learning Curve on Surgical Management of Vasculobiliary Injuries after Cholecystectomy.

Background. Concomitant vascular injury might adversely impact outcomes after iatrogenic bile duct injury (IBDI). Whether a new HPB center should embark upon repair of complex biliary injuries with associated vascular injuries during learning curve is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine outcome of surgical management of IBDI with and without vascular injuries in a new HPB center during its learning curve. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent surgical management of IBDI at our center. A total of 39 patients were included. Patients without (Group 1) and with vascular injuries (Group 2) were compared. Outcome was defined as 90-day morbidity and mortality. Results. Median age was 39 (20-80) years. There were 10 (25.6%) vascular injuries. E2 injuries were associated significantly with high frequency of vascular injuries (66% versus 15.1%) (P = 0.01). Right hepatectomy was performed in three patients. Out of these, two had a right hepatic duct stricture and one patient had combined right arterial and portal venous injury. The number of patients who developed postoperative complications was not significantly different between the two groups (11.1% versus 23.4%) (P = 0.6). Conclusion. Learning curve is not a negative prognostic variable in the surgical management of iatrogenic vasculobiliary injuries after cholecystectomy.