Single visit surgery for pediatric ambulatory surgical procedures: a satisfaction and cost analysis.

BACKGROUND: Single visit surgery (SVS) consists of same-day pre-operative assessment and operation with telephone post-operative follow-up. This reduces family time commitment to 1 hospital trip rather than 2-3. We began SVS for ambulatory patients with clear surgical indications in 2013. We sought to determine family satisfaction, cost savings to families, and institutional financial feasibility of SVS. METHODS: SVS patients were compared to age/case matched conventional surgery (CS) patients. Satisfaction was assessed by post-operative telephone survey. Family costs were calculated as the sum of lost revenue (based on median income) and transportation costs ($0.50/mile). RESULTS: Satisfaction was high in both groups (98% for SVS vs. 93% for CS; p=0.27). 40% of CS families indicated that they would have preferred SVS, whereas no SVS families indicated preference for the CS option (p<0.001). Distance from the hospital did not correlate with satisfaction. Estimated cost savings for an SVS family was $188. Reimbursement, hospital and physician charges, and day-of-surgery cancellation rates were similar. CONCLUSIONS: SVS provides substantial cost savings to families while maintaining patient satisfaction and equivalent institutional reimbursement. SVS is an effective approach to low-risk ambulatory surgical procedures that is less disruptive to families, facilitates access to pediatric surgical care, and reduces resource utilization. TYPE OF STUDY: Cost Effectiveness Study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Harvesting the benefits of biofilms: A novel probiotic delivery system for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Probiotics reduce the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) albeit only when administered at high frequency (at least daily). We have developed a novel probiotic delivery system in which probiotics are grown as a biofilm on microspheres, allowing enhanced efficacy with only a single treatment. METHODS: Neonatal rats were subjected to experimental NEC. Pups received a single enteral dose of: (1) vehicle only, (2) unloaded microspheres, (3) MRS (broth)-loaded microspheres, (4) Lactobacillus reuteri, (5) L. reuteri grown on unloaded microspheres, or (6) L. reuteri grown on MRS-loaded microspheres. Intestinal injury was graded histologically and intestinal permeability determined by serum levels of enterally administered fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled dextran. RESULTS: 69% of untreated pups developed NEC, whereas 32% of pups treated with L. reuteri grown as a biofilm on unloaded microspheres (p=0.009) and 33% of pups treated with L. reuteri grown as a biofilm on MRS-loaded microspheres (p=0.005) developed NEC. No other group had a significant reduction in NEC. Furthermore, pups treated with L. reuteri grown as a biofilm had significantly reduced intestinal permeability. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of Lactobacillus biofilm grown on biocompatible microspheres significantly reduces NEC incidence and severity. This novel probiotic delivery system may be beneficial in the prevention of NEC in the future.

Exosomes secreted from bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells protect the intestines from experimental necrotizing enterocolitis.

PURPOSE: Treatment options for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) remain inadequate. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) can protect the intestines from NEC. Exosomes are nanoparticle-sized vesicles with important cell signaling capabilities. The objective of this study was to determine whether BM-MSC-derived exosomes can prevent NEC. METHODS: Rat pups were either breast fed (Group 1) or subjected to experimental NEC and randomized to receive either no treatment (Group 2) or an intraperitoneal (IP) injection of PBS (Group 3), BM-MSC (Group 4), or BM-MSC-derived exosomes (Group 5). Histologic injury grade and intestinal permeability were determined. The effect of BM-MSC-derived exosomes on IEC-6 intestinal epithelial cells in an in vitro scrape model of wound healing was also determined. RESULTS: Animals exposed to NEC that were either untreated or received PBS alone had an NEC incidence of 46% and 41%, respectively (p=0.61). Compared to untreated pups, the incidence of NEC was significantly lower in pups treated with either BM-MSC (9%, p=0.0003) or MB-MSC-derived exosomes (13%, p=0.0008). Similar results were found for intestinal permeability. Wound healing in IEC-6 cells was significantly increased by BM-MSC-derived exosomes. CONCLUSION: BM-MSC-derived exosomes protect the intestines from NEC and may represent a novel, cell-free, preventative therapy for NEC in the future.

Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Adolescents; Reality or Hype.

BACKGROUND: The rising prevalence of childhood obesity and concomitant increase in comorbid disease pose significant challenges for the health care system. While mounting evidence demonstrates the safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery for severely obese adolescents, the potential role of robotic technology has not been well defined. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (RSG) in treating severe adolescent obesity. In addition, 30-day outcomes and hospital charges were compared to subjects undergoing RSG versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 28 subjects (14 LSG vs. 14 RSG) at a single institution was conducted. Data collection included demographics, body mass index, comorbidities, hospital length of stay (LOS), operative time, 30-day outcomes, and hospital charges. Analysis was performed using chi-square, Fisher's exact, and nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum tests. RESULTS: There were no differences in subject demographics or comorbidities. While median operative time was longer for RSG vs. LSG (132 vs. 100 min, p = 0.0002), the median LOS for RSG compared to LSG was shorter (69.6 vs. 75.9 h, p = 0.0094). In addition, RSG-related hospital charges were higher ($56,646 vs. $49,498, p = 0.0366). No significant differences in post-operative outcomes or complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: RSG is equally safe and efficacious when compared to LSG among adolescents. Similar to studies in adults, LOS is shortened while hospital charges are higher. Larger prospective studies are needed to gain insight regarding cost benefit ratios.