Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
1.
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent ; 24(2): 211-218, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36602708

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Evaluate the impact of gingivitis on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) amongst 12-year-old schoolchildren from Quito, Ecuador. METHODS: We evaluated 998 school children using the Community Periodontal Index for gingival bleeding and calculus. OHRQoL was assessed with the Child Perceptions Questionnaire 11-14 (CPQ11-14) questionnaire. RESULTS: Of the 998 schoolchildren, 93% had gingival bleeding and 73% had dental calculus. Schoolchildren with more than one sextant with gingival bleeding had 1.18 times higher mean CPQ11-14 (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11-1.27) than those with none or just one affected sextant. Male schoolchildren presented a 15% lower mean Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ) (RT 0.85; 95% CI 0.76-0.96). Children whose parents had incomplete secondary education had a 15% lower mean CPQ (RT 0.85; 95% CI 0.77-0.94). Bleeding in more than one sextant was significantly associated with worse quality of life in the emotional well-being (RT 1.40, 95% CI 1.03-1.90) and social well-being domains (RT 1.76, 95% CI 1.32-2.34). CONCLUSION: Gingival bleeding negatively impacted the OHRQoL of 12-year-old Ecuadorian schoolchildren living in Quito.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries , Gingivitis , Child , Humans , Male , Quality of Life , Dental Caries/psychology , Oral Health , Ecuador/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent ; 30(4): 252-261, 2022 Nov 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35254011

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This double-blind randomized clinical trial (RCT) aimed to evaluate the 2-year survival rates of endocrowns and partial coverage ceramic restorations (PCCR) with fiber posts. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty (40) participants fulfilled the elegibility criteria, and they were randomly allocated in 2 groups: Endocrown or PCCR+post. The survival rates were assessed based on USPHS modified and radiographic examinations. A Chi-square test was used to assess the distribution of characteristics between groups. Kaplan-Meier and Log-rank tests were used to estimate the survival rate. To evaluate the association between survival of the restorations and the explanatory variables, the Multivariate Cox regression model was used. Only variables presenting p⟨0.20 were maintained in final model (α= 0.05). RESULTS: The highest 2-year survival rates were recorded for the Endocrown group (100%), whereas the PCCR+post group exhibited the lowest performance (66.7%). Most of the restoration failures was due to lack of marginal adaption, fracture, and recurrent caries. Cox Regression unadjusted analysis showed that only type of restoration presented a significant effect (p⟨0.20). Thus, adjusted analysis was not performed. CONCLUSIONS: Endocrowns appear to be a promising conservative restorative option and to be feasible and reliable approach restoring endodontically.


Subject(s)
Crowns , Dental Porcelain , Humans , Dental Restoration Failure , Materials Testing , Ceramics
3.
Aust Dent J ; 67(2): 148-158, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34904247

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Occlusoproximal restorations of primary molars usually fail, so it is necessary to investigate new materials that may overcome this challenge. Thus, this trial aimed to evaluate the longevity of occlusoproximal ART restorations in primary molars using a glass ionomer cement - GIC (Equia Forte® - GC Corp) and a Giomer resin composite - GCR (Beautifil Bulk Restorative® - Shofu Inc) after 24 months. METHODS: One hundred and eighty-two (182) children aged from 4 to 8 years were selected and randomly assigned to GIC or GCR. A paediatric dentist treated them in the school setting in Cerquilho, Brazil, and the restorations were assessed after 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. The primary outcome was the restoration survival, evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier and superiority Cox regression analyses. Intention to treat (ITT) was performed as a sensitivity analysis using superiority test P value and confidence interval (CI = 95%). Independent variables included gender, age, molar, jaw, cavity volume and caries experience. RESULTS: The restoration survival after 24 months was GIC = 58.1% and GCR = 49.1% (HR = 1.24; CI = 0.97-1.59). ITT analysis showed a success of GIC = 61.1% and GCR = 52.2% (RR = 1.17; CI = 0.91-1.52). The superiority hypothesis was not proved in both analyses (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: GCR does not have superior longevity than GIC in occlusoproximal ART restorations of primary molars.


Subject(s)
Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment , Dental Caries , Acrylic Resins , Child , Composite Resins , Dental Caries/therapy , Dental Restoration Failure , Dental Restoration, Permanent , Glass Ionomer Cements/therapeutic use , Humans , Molar , Silicon Dioxide , Tooth, Deciduous
4.
Clin Oral Investig ; 22(8): 2703-2725, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30232622

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study is to update the results of two previous meta-analyses, published in 2006 and 2012, on the survival percentages of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations and ART sealants. The current meta-analysis includes Chinese publications not investigated before. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Until February 2017, six databases were interrogated (two English, one Portuguese, one Spanish and two Chinese). Using six exclusion criteria, a group of six independent reviewers selected 43 publications from a total of 1958 potentially relevant studies retrieved. Confidence intervals and/or standard errors were calculated and the heterogeneity variance of the survival rates was estimated. RESULTS: The survival percentages and standard errors of single-surface and multiple-surface ART restorations in primary posterior teeth over the first 2 years were 94.3% (± 1.5) and 65.4% (± 3.9), respectively; for single-surface ART restorations in permanent posterior teeth over the first 3 years, they were 87.1% (± 3.2); and for multiple-surface ART restorations in permanent posterior teeth over the first 5 years, they were 77% (± 9.0). The mean annual dentine-carious-lesion-failure percentages in previously sealed pits and fissures using ART sealants in permanent posterior teeth over the first 3 and 5 years were 0.9 and 1.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ART single-surface restorations presented high survival percentages in both primary and permanent posterior teeth, whilst ART multiple-surface restorations presented lower survival percentages. ART sealants presented a high-caries-preventive effect. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: ART is an effective evidence-based option for treating and preventing carious lesions in primary and permanent posterior teeth.


Subject(s)
Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment , Dental Restoration Failure/statistics & numerical data , Pit and Fissure Sealants/therapeutic use , Bicuspid , Dental Caries/prevention & control , Humans , Molar
5.
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent ; 18(6): 423-426, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29086346

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Since cases of deep caries lesions may result in dental extraction due to any absence of endodontic services, and considering the advantages of conservative treatment, partial caries removal can be a viable alternative to the treatment of these lesions. CASE REPORT: During the clinical examination, generalised caries lesions were observed in a 6-year-old boy. In the maxillary right first permanent molar (tooth 16), without sensitivity to percussion and/or spontaneous pain, partial caries removal of deep caries was performed being careful to avoid pulpal exposure, followed by capping with calcium hydroxide cement and restoration using glass ionomer cement. FOLLOW-UP: After 14 years, the success of the treatment was observed by the tooth being symptom-free, the caries arrested and healthy on periapical radiograph examination even though the restoration had been lost. Endodontic treatment was not considered necessary and the dental survival time was increased, keeping the pulp vitality and absence of apical pathologies. Therefore, a restoration with Z350 resin composite was performed to return masticatory function to the tooth. CONCLUSION: Partial caries removal increased the dental survival time, avoiding the necessity of endodontic treatment and early dental loss.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries/therapy , Dentition, Permanent , Molar , Calcium Hydroxide , Child , Dental Cements , Dental Restoration, Permanent/methods , Glass Ionomer Cements , Humans , Male
6.
Br Dent J ; 222(6): 478-483, 2017 Mar 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28336976

ABSTRACT

It is ten years since the first paper on the Hall Technique was published in the British Dental Journal and almost 20 years since the technique first came to notice. Dr Norna Hall a (now retired) general dental practitioner from the north of Scotland had, for many years, been managing carious primary molar teeth by cementing preformed metal crowns over them, with no local anaesthesia, tooth preparation or carious tissue removal. This first report, a retrospective analysis of Dr Hall's treatments, caused controversy. How could simply sealing a carious lesion, with all the associated bacteria and decayed tissues, possibly be clinically successful? Since then, growing understanding that caries is essentially a biofilm driven disease rather than an infectious disease, explains why the Hall Technique, and other 'sealing in' carious lesion techniques, are successful. The intervening ten years has seen robust evidence from several randomised control trials that are either completed or underway. These have found the Hall Technique superior to comparator treatments, with success rates (no pain or infection) of 99% (UK study) and 100% (Germany) at one year, 98% and 93% over two years (UK and Germany) and 97% over five years (UK). The Hall Technique is now regarded as one of several biological management options for carious lesions in primary molars. This paper covers commonly asked questions about the Hall Technique and speculates on what lies ahead.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries/therapy , Dental Restoration, Permanent/methods , Humans , Molar , Time Factors , Tooth, Deciduous
7.
J Dent Res ; 94(7): 895-904, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25994176

ABSTRACT

We aimed to perform a systematic review including a meta-analysis to evaluate the overall accuracy of visual methods for detecting carious lesions and to identify possible sources of heterogeneity among the studies included. Two reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and other sources through July 2014 to identify published and nonpublished studies in English. Studies of visual inspection were included that 1) assessed accuracy of the method in detecting caries lesions; 2) were performed on occlusal, proximal, or free smooth surfaces in primary or permanent teeth; 3) had a reference standard; and 4) reported sufficient data about sample size and accuracy of methods. The data were used to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and summary receiver operating characteristics curve. Heterogeneity of the studies was also assessed. A total of 102 manuscripts (from 5,808 articles initially identified) and 1 abstract (from 168) met the inclusion criteria. In general, the analysis demonstrated that the visual method had good accuracy for detecting caries lesions. Although laboratory and clinical studies have presented similar accuracy, clinically obtained specificity was higher. We also observed moderate to high heterogeneity and evidence of publication bias in most papers. Moreover, studies employing widely recognized visual scoring systems presented significantly better accuracy as compared to studies that used their own criteria. In conclusion, visual caries detection method has good overall performance. Furthermore, although the identified studies had high heterogeneity and risk of bias, the use of detailed and validated indices seems to improve the accuracy of the method.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries/diagnosis , Physical Examination/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Odds Ratio , Predictive Value of Tests , Publication Bias , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tooth, Deciduous/pathology
8.
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent ; 14(5): 345-9, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24085648

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate the dental structure loss associated with procedures of replacement or maintenance for ditched amalgam restorations in primary molars and the time required to perform each treatment. METHODS: Ditched amalgam restorations (n = 40) were submitted to four different strategies: polishing group-polishing and finishing of restorations; amalgam group-replacement of ditched amalgam restorations with new amalgam restorations; resin group-replacement of amalgam restorations with resin composite restorations; flowable resin group-filling the ditch with a flowable resin composite. The teeth were analysed with a stereomicroscope and the areas pre- and post-treatment were determined by image analysis software to evaluate structural loss. The time required to perform each treatment was recorded in seconds. STATISTICS: Student's t test was used to compare areas pre- and post-treatments. ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls tests (p < 0.05) were used to compare differences among groups and the time to perform each procedure. RESULTS: Dental structure loss was observed in resin and amalgam groups. Replacing the restorations with amalgam took more time, while polishing and applying flowable resin composite consumed less than half of the time compared with amalgam and resin groups. CONCLUSION: Maintenance of ditched amalgam restorations by polishing and sealing preserves dental structure and involves less time compared with that for replacement of restorations.


Subject(s)
Dental Amalgam , Dental Restoration, Permanent , Humans , Molar , Tooth, Deciduous
9.
Caries Res ; 46(6): 536-43, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22907166

ABSTRACT

Clinical guidelines advise that dentists take radiographs in children to detect caries lesions missed by visual inspection; however, due to the current low caries prevalence in most countries, we hypothesized that the adjunct methods of caries detection would not significantly improve the detection of primary molar lesions in comparison to visual inspection alone. We evaluated the performance of visual inspection, alone or in combination with radiographic and laser fluorescence pen (LFpen) methods, in detecting occlusal and approximal caries lesions in primary molars. Two examiners evaluated children who had sought dental treatment with these diagnostic strategies. The reference standard involved the temporary separation of approximal and operative interventions for occlusal surfaces. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and utility of diagnostic strategies were calculated. Simultaneous combined strategies increased sensitivities but decreased specificities. Furthermore, no differences were observed in accuracy and utility, parameters more influenced by caries prevalence. In conclusion, adjunct radiographic and laser fluorescence methods offer no benefits to the detection of caries in primary teeth in comparison to visual inspection alone; hence, present clinical guidelines should be re-evaluated.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries/diagnosis , Lasers , Radiography, Bitewing/statistics & numerical data , Tooth, Deciduous/pathology , Child , Child, Preschool , Dental Caries/diagnostic imaging , Dental Caries/pathology , Dental Enamel/pathology , Dentin/pathology , Female , Fluorescence , Humans , Male , Molar/pathology , Multilevel Analysis , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Sensitivity and Specificity
10.
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent ; 12(6): 303-7, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22122849

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate the degree of knowledge, use and teaching of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) of paediatric dentistry lecturers in dental schools throughout Brazil. METHODS: A structured questionnaire was applied, containing questions regarding the use of ART, socio-demographic characteristics and academic degree background. Descriptive analysis and Poisson's regression were conducted in order to verify the association between exploratory variables and ART teaching (α=5%). RESULTS: Of the 721 questionnaires sent to dental schools, approximately 40% were returned (n=285). Some 98.2% of the participants teach ART. STATISTICS: Concerning dental lecturers who teach ART, in multiple regression model, considering ART indication (emergency versus restorative treatment) the lecturers residents of the Mid-West (PR=1.66; CI:1.13-2.45) and Northeast region (PR=1.33; CI:1.02-1.72) and lecturers who use ART regularly (PR=3.73; CI:2.11-5.59) teach ART as restorative treatment. When the question was about reason for using ART (conservative technique versus other techniques failures/fast treatment), lecturers with a longer period of TG (time elapsed since graduation) (PR=1.30; CI:1.08- 1.56) and also lecturers who use ART regularly (PR=2.87; CI:1.95-4.22), teach it as being a conservative technique. Regarding the patients' age covered by ART (versus without limitation), women (PR=1.26; CI:1.06-1.50) and lecturers who use ART regularly (PR=1.28; CI:1.06-1.54), teach that there is no age restriction. CONCLUSIONS: ART has been widely taught in Brazilian dental schools, is regularly used in lecturer's clinical practices and has positively influenced the appropriate teaching of this technique.


Subject(s)
Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment , Dentistry, Operative/education , Pediatric Dentistry/education , Adult , Age Factors , Brazil , Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Faculty, Dental , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Regression Analysis , Schools, Dental , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
11.
Arch Oral Biol ; 56(10): 1014-9, 2011 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21489401

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: the purpose of this study was to determine the mineral loss on surrounding enamel restored with glass ionomer cements (GIC) after erosive and cariogenic challenges. METHODS: Bovine enamel specimens were randomly assigned into six groups according to the restorative material: G1 - composite resin; G2 - high viscous GIC; G3 - resin-modified glass ionomer with nanoparticles; G4 - encapsulated resin-modified GIC; G5 - encapsulated high viscous GIC; G6 - resin-modified GIC. After restorative procedures, half of specimens in each group were submitted to caries challenge using a pH cycling model for 5 days, and the other half were submitted to erosive challenge in citric acid for 10 min. Before and after the challenges, surface Knoop microhardness assessments were performed and mineral changes were calculated for adjacent enamel at different distances from restorative margin. RESULTS: Data were compared for significant differences using two-way ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls tests (p<0.05). Erosive challenge significantly reduced enamel surface hardness, but no significant difference was observed irrespectively restorative materials (p>0.05). The cariogenic challenge promoted a higher surface hardness loss for the resin-modified GIC (G4) and only for the High viscous GIC (G2) an increase in surface hardness was observed. For enamel analyses, significant differences were observed with respect to the different materials (p<0.001) and distances (p=0.023). Specimens restored with the composite resin presented higher mineral loss and specimens restored with the conventional high viscous GIC and the encapsulated resin-modified GIC presented the lowest values for mineral loss. CONCLUSION: The GICs exerts protective effect only for cariogenic challenge.


Subject(s)
Cariogenic Agents/adverse effects , Citric Acid/adverse effects , Dental Enamel/pathology , Dental Restoration, Permanent/methods , Glass Ionomer Cements/chemistry , Tooth Demineralization/etiology , Tooth Erosion/complications , Animals , Cattle , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Materials/chemistry , Dental Polishing/methods , Hardness , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Minerals/analysis , Nanoparticles/chemistry , Protective Agents/chemistry , Random Allocation , Resin Cements/chemistry , Tooth Remineralization/methods , Viscosity
12.
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent ; 11(5): 232-5, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20932397

ABSTRACT

AIM: To assess the efficiency of different polyacrylic acid concentrations on the removal of the smear layer after caries removal with hand and rotary instruments in affected dentine of primary teeth. STUDY DESIGN: In vitro study. METHODS: Six exfoliated primary molars with carious lesions were divided into two groups for caries removal: (1) hand instrument or (2) low speed bur. Each tooth was cut into four pieces. One piece assigned as control surface and the other three surfaces were actively treated with either 40% Fuji IXGP Liquid (GC America), or 40% Fuji IXGP Liquid diluted with water, and 25% Ketac Molar(TM) Conditioner (3M-ESPE). Surfaces were prepared for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). All images were submitted to an analysis by an experienced SEM professional, regarding presence or absence of smear layer and dentinal demineralization pattern. Chi-squared test was carried out (5% significance). RESULTS: There was no difference concerning the presence of a smear layer in relation to the method of caries removal, and 40% Fuji IXGP diluted with water causes a higher demineralization when compared with the control group of teeth (p=0.01). CONCLUSION: Treatments with polyacrylic acid are indicated prior to glass ionomer cement application in primary teeth.


Subject(s)
Acrylic Resins/therapeutic use , Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment/methods , Dental Cavity Preparation/methods , Dentin/drug effects , Smear Layer , Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Collagen/ultrastructure , Dental Caries/therapy , Dental Cavity Preparation/instrumentation , Dentin/ultrastructure , Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry , Glass Ionomer Cements/chemistry , Humans , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Molar/drug effects , Molar/ultrastructure , Tooth, Deciduous/drug effects , Tooth, Deciduous/ultrastructure , Water/chemistry
13.
Caries Res ; 44(5): 465-71, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20861630

ABSTRACT

This in vivo study aimed to evaluate the performance of methods of approximal caries detection in primary molars and to assess the influence of the discomfort caused by these methods on their performance. Two examiners evaluated 76 children (4-12 years old) using visual inspection (ICDAS), radiography and a laser fluorescence device (DIAGNOdent pen, LFpen). The reference standard was visual inspection after temporary separation with orthodontic rubbers. Surfaces were classified as sound, noncavitated (NC) or cavitated (Cav), and performance was assessed at both NC and Cav thresholds. Wong-Baker faces scale was employed to assess the discomfort. Multilevel analysis was performed to verify the influence of discomfort on performance, considering the number of false-positives and false-negatives as outcome. At NC threshold, visual inspection achieved better performance (sensitivities and accuracies around 0.67) than other methods (sensitivities around 0.25 and accuracies around 0.35). At Cav threshold, visual inspection presented lower sensitivity (0.23 and 0.19), and LFpen (0.52 and 0.42) and radiography (0.52) presented similar sensitivities. Concerning the influence of the discomfort, at NC threshold, when discomfort was present, the number of false-negative results was lower with LFpen and the number of false-positive results was higher with visual inspection. At Cav threshold, the number of false-positive results was higher with LFpen. In conclusion, radiography and LFpen achieved similar performance in detecting approximal caries lesions in primary teeth and the discomfort caused by visual inspection and LFpen can influence the performance of these methods, since a higher number of false-positive or false-negative results occurred in children who reported discomfort.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries/diagnosis , Molar/pathology , Pain Measurement , Tooth, Deciduous/pathology , Area Under Curve , Child , Child, Preschool , Dental Caries/diagnostic imaging , Dental Caries/pathology , False Negative Reactions , False Positive Reactions , Female , Fluorescence , Humans , Lasers , Male , Physical Examination/standards , ROC Curve , Radiography, Bitewing/standards , Reference Standards , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tooth Demineralization/diagnosis
14.
Aust Dent J ; 54(3): 233-7, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19709111

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements (GICs) used for atraumatic restorative treatment. Wear resistance, Knoop hardness (Kh), flexural (F(s)) and compressive strength (C(s)) were evaluated. The GICs used were Riva Self Cure (RVA), Fuji IX (FIX), Hi Dense (HD), Vitro Molar (VM), Maxxion R (MXR) and Ketac Molar Easymix (KME). METHODS: Wear was evaluated after 1, 4, 63 and 365 days. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests (P = 0.05) analysed differences in wear of the GICs and the time effect. F(s), C(s), and Kh were analysed with one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: The type of cement (p < 0.001) and the time (p < 0.001) had a significant effect on wear. In early-term wear and Kh, KME and FIX presented the best performance. In long-term wear, F(s) and C(s), KME, FIX and HD had the best performance. Strong explanatory power between F(s) and the Kh (r(2) = 0.85), C(s) and the Kh (r(2) = 0.82), long-term wear and F(s) of 24 h (r(2) = 0.79) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggested that KME and FIX presented the best in vitro performance. HD showed good results except for early-term wear.


Subject(s)
Dental Restoration, Permanent/methods , Glass Ionomer Cements/chemistry , Analysis of Variance , Compressive Strength , Dental Stress Analysis , Hardness , Materials Testing , Statistics, Nonparametric , Stress, Mechanical , Time Factors
15.
Caries Res ; 43(1): 36-42, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19136830

ABSTRACT

This in vivo study aimed to compare the performance of different methods of approximal caries detection in primary molars. Fifty children (aged 5-12 years) were selected, and 2 examiners evaluated 621 approximal surfaces of primary molars using: (a) visual inspection, (b) the radiographic method and (c) a pen-type laser fluorescence device (LFpen). As reference standard method, the teeth were separated using orthodontic rubbers during 7 days, and the surfaces were evaluated by 2 examiners for the presence of white spots or cavitations. The area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (A(z)) as well as sensitivity, specificity and accuracy (percentage of correct diagnosis) were calculated and compared with the McNemar test at both thresholds. The interexaminer reproducibility was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC-absolute values) and the kappa test (dichotomizing for both thresholds). The ICC value of the reference standard procedure was 0.94. At white-spot threshold, no methods tested presented good performance (sensitivity: visual 0.20-0.21; radiographic 0.16-0.23; LFpen 0.16; specificity: visual 0.95; radiographic 0.99-1.00; LFpen 0.94-0.96). At cavitation threshold, both LFpen and radiographic methods demonstrated higher sensitivity (0.55-0.65 and 0.65-0.70, respectively) and A(z) (0.92 and 0.88-0.89, respectively) than visual inspection sensitivity (0.30) and A(z) (0.69-0.76). All methods presented high specificities (around 0.99) and similar ICCs, but the kappa value for LFpen at white-spot threshold was lower (0.44). In conclusion, both LFpen and radiographic methods present similar performance in detecting the presence of cavitations on approximal surfaces of primary molars.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries/diagnosis , Lasers , Child , Child, Preschool , Dental Caries Activity Tests/methods , Female , Fluorescence , Humans , Male , Molar/pathology , Radiography, Bitewing , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tooth, Deciduous
16.
Braz Dent J ; 12(3): 197-200, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11696918

ABSTRACT

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate marginal leakage in class V restorations in primary teeth restored with amalgam, using three different techniques. Thirty maxillary anterior primary teeth, clinically sound and naturally exfoliated, were used. In group 1 (n = 10), two thin layers of a copal varnish (Cavitine) were applied. In group 2 (n = 10), Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus, a dual adhesive system, was used according to manufacturer instructions. In group 3 (n = 10), One-Step adhesive system in combination with a low-viscosity resin (Resinomer) were used according to manufacturer instructions. All samples were restored with a high-copper dental amalgam alloy (GS 80, SDI). After restoration, the samples were stored in normal saline at 37 degrees C for 72 h. The specimens were polished, thermocycled (500 cycles, 5 degrees and 55 degrees C, 30-s dwell time) and impermeabilized with fingernail polish to within 1.0 mm of the restoration margins. The teeth were then placed in 0.5% methylene blue for 4 h. Finally, the samples were sectioned and evaluated for marginal leakage. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed that the filled adhesive resin (group 3) had the least microleakage. There was no significant difference between groups 1 and 2.


Subject(s)
Dental Amalgam , Dental Bonding/methods , Dental Leakage/prevention & control , Dental Restoration, Permanent/methods , Tooth, Deciduous , Composite Resins , Dental Cavity Lining , Dental Materials , Dentin-Bonding Agents , Humans , Incisor , Maxilla , Methacrylates , Resin Cements , Resins, Plant , Statistics, Nonparametric
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...