Electrocatalytic Ammonia Oxidation by a Low-Coordinate Copper Complex.

Molecular catalysts for ammonia oxidation to dinitrogen represent enabling components to utilize ammonia as a fuel and/or source of hydrogen. Ammonia oxidation requires not only the breaking of multiple strong N-H bonds but also controlled N-N bond formation. We report a novel ß-diketiminato copper complex [iPr2NNF6]CuI-NH3 ([CuI]-NH3 (2)) as a robust electrocatalyst for NH3 oxidation in acetonitrile under homogeneous conditions. Complex 2 operates at a moderate overpotential (η = 700 mV) with a TOFmax = 940 h-1 as determined from CV data in 1.3 M NH3-MeCN solvent. Prolonged (>5 h) controlled potential electrolysis (CPE) reveals the stability and robustness of the catalyst under electrocatalytic conditions. Detailed mechanistic investigations indicate that electrochemical oxidation of [CuI]-NH3 forms {[CuII]-NH3}+ (4), which undergoes deprotonation by excess NH3 to form reactive copper(II)-amide ([CuII]-NH2, 6) unstable toward N-N bond formation to give the dinuclear hydrazine complex [CuI]2(µ-N2H4). Electrochemical studies reveal that the diammine complex [CuI](NH3)2 (7) forms at high ammonia concentration as part of the {[CuII](NH3)2}+/[CuI](NH3)2 redox couple that is electrocatalytically inactive. DFT analysis reveals a much higher thermodynamic barrier for deprotonation of the four-coordinate {[CuII](NH3)2}+ (8) by NH3 to give the copper(II) amide [CuII](NH2)(NH3) (9) (ΔG = 31.7 kcal/mol) as compared to deprotonation of the three-coordinate {[CuII]-NH3}+ by NH3 to provide the reactive three-coordinate parent amide [CuII]-NH2 (ΔG = 18.1 kcal/mol) susceptible to N-N coupling to form [CuI]2(µ-N2H4) (ΔG = -11.8 kcal/mol).

Copper Catalyzed sp3 C-H Etherification with Acyl Protected Phenols.

A variety of acyl protected phenols AcOAr participate in sp3 C-H etherification of substrates R-H to give alkyl aryl ethers R-OAr employing tBuOOtBu as oxidant with copper(I) ß-diketiminato catalysts [CuI]. Although 1°, 2°, and 3° C-H bonds may be functionalized, selectivity studies reveal a preference for the construction of hindered, 3° C-OAr bonds. Mechanistic studies indicate that ß-diketiminato copper(II) phenolates [CuII]-OAr play a key role in this C-O bond forming reaction, formed via transesterification of AcOAr with [CuII]-OtBu intermediates generated upon reaction of [CuI] with tBuOOtBu.

Steric effects on the primary isotope dependence of secondary kinetic isotope effects in hydride transfer reactions in solution: caused by the isotopically different tunneling ready state conformations?

The observed 1° isotope effect on 2° KIEs in H-transfer reactions has recently been explained on the basis of a H-tunneling mechanism that uses the concept that the tunneling of a heavier isotope requires a shorter donor-acceptor distance (DAD) than that of a lighter isotope. The shorter DAD in D-tunneling, as compared to H-tunneling, could bring about significant spatial crowding effect that stiffens the 2° H/D vibrations, thus decreasing the 2° KIE. This leads to a new physical organic research direction that examines how structure affects the 1° isotope dependence of 2° KIEs and how this dependence provides information about the structure of the tunneling ready states (TRSs). The hypothesis is that H- and D-tunneling have TRS structures which have different DADs, and pronounced 1° isotope effect on 2° KIEs should be observed in tunneling systems that are sterically hindered. This paper investigates the hypothesis by determining the 1° isotope effect on α- and ß-2° KIEs for hydride transfer reactions from various hydride donors to different carbocationic hydride acceptors in solution. The systems were designed to include the interactions of the steric groups and the targeted 2° H/D's in the TRSs. The results substantiate our hypothesis, and they are not consistent with the traditional model of H-tunneling and 1°/2° H coupled motions that has been widely used to explain the 1° isotope dependence of 2° KIEs in the enzyme-catalyzed H-transfer reactions. The behaviors of the 1° isotope dependence of 2° KIEs in solution are compared to those with alcohol dehydrogenases, and sources of the observed "puzzling" 2° KIE behaviors in these enzymes are discussed using the concept of the isotopically different TRS conformations.