Functional and Quality of Life Outcomes of a Hand Surgery Mission to Honduras.

Background: The objective of this study was to assess functional, quality of life, and satisfaction outcomes of a hand surgery short-term surgical mission (STSM) to Honduras, and determine whether patient demographics and surgery characteristics during a surgical mission correlate with outcome. Methods: A total of 63 patients who received upper extremity surgery at a week-long hand surgery STSM to Honduras in March 2013 participated in the study. A before-after study design was used. Before receiving surgery, participants completed the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire and the Short Form 12 Health Survey version 2 (SF12v2). Four months postoperatively, participants completed the QuickDASH, SF12v2, and Satisfaction Survey. Results: The mean QuickDASH score significantly improved preoperatively to postoperatively. Demographics measures of age, sex, education, and income did not correlate with QuickDASH scores. Preoperative QuickDASH statistically significantly correlated with surgery type: Carpal tunnel patients had the highest scores (worst functioning). Postoperatively, mass excision and scar contracture/skin graft patients were correlated with the lowest scores. Carpal tunnel and tendon surgery patients showed greatest correlation with QuickDASH improvement. SF-12 scores revealed improvements in mental domains and declines in physical domains. Conclusions: Hand surgery performed during STSMs can result in significant functional improvement, regardless of socioeconomic status. Patients benefited from both simpler and more complex operations. Four months after surgery, general health-related quality of life measures showed improved mental indices. Measured physical indices declined despite improved QuickDASH scores. This may be due to the early general postoperative state. Further outcome research in STSMs in additional countries and specialties is required to expand our conclusions to other STSM contexts and guide best practices in STSMs.

The revolving hospital door: hospital readmissions among patients who are homeless.

BACKGROUND: National attention is increasingly focused on hospital readmissions. Little prior research has examined readmissions among patients who are homeless. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine 30-day hospital readmission rates among patients who are homeless and examine factors associated with hospital readmissions in this population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who were homeless and hospitalized at a single urban hospital from May-August 2012. Homelessness was identified by an electronic medical record flag and confirmed by manual chart review. The primary outcome was all-cause hospital readmission to the study hospital within 30 days of hospital discharge. Patient-level and hospitalization-level factors associated with risk for readmission were examined using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: There were 113 unique patients who were homeless and admitted to the hospital a total of 266 times during the study period. The mean age was 49 years, 27.4% of patients were women, and 75.2% had Medicaid. Half (50.8%) of all hospitalizations resulted in a 30-day hospital inpatient readmission and 70.3% resulted in either an inpatient readmission, observation status stay, or emergency department visit within 30 days of hospital discharge. Most readmissions occurred early after hospital discharge (53.9% within 1 week, 74.8% within 2 weeks). Discharge to the streets or shelter versus other living situations was associated with increased risk for readmission in multivariable analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who were homeless had strikingly high 30-day hospital readmission rates. These findings suggest the urgent need for further research and interventions to improve postdischarge care for patients who are homeless.

Medical respite programs for homeless patients: a systematic review.

Medical respite programs provide care to homeless patients who are too sick to be on the streets or in a traditional shelter, but not sick enough to warrant inpatient hospitalization. They are designed to improve the health of homeless patients while also decreasing costly hospital use. Although there is increasing interest in implementing respite programs, there has been no prior systematic review of their effectiveness. We conducted a comprehensive search for studies of medical respite program outcomes in multiple biomedical and sociological databases, and the grey literature. Thirteen articles met inclusion criteria. The articles were heterogeneous in methods, study quality, inclusion of a comparison group, and outcomes examined. Available evidence showed that medical respite programs reduced future hospital admissions, inpatient days, and hospital readmissions. They also resulted in improved housing outcomes. Results for emergency department use and costs were mixed but promising. Future research utilizing adequate comparison groups is needed.