Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Early Interv Psychiatry ; 13(3): 509-516, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29034588

ABSTRACT

AIM: To investigate the relationship between the presenting clinical and demographic characteristics in first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients with their clinical diagnostic grouping 1 year later. METHODS: Data from 1014 first-presentation psychosis patients from seven London-based Early Intervention Services were extracted from the MiData audit database. Associations between clinical and demographic measures at presentation and clinical diagnosis made at 1 year were assessed with analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Chi-square tests. RESULTS: The sample comprised 76% of patients with schizophrenia-spectrum diagnoses, 9% with manic psychoses (MP) and 6% with depressive psychoses. Compared to the other 2 groups, patients who were diagnosed as having MP were younger, with higher education and shorter duration of untreated psychosis, and had higher Young Mania Rating Scale scores at presentation and lower Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) negative scores. Patients diagnosed at 1 year as having depressive psychosis were older and more likely to be white, with the lowest PANSS positive scores at baseline. Patients diagnosed at 1 year as having schizophrenia spectrum diagnoses were more likely to be males. Patients in the 3 diagnostic subgroups of psychosis differed on both clinical and demographic characteristics at presentation. CONCLUSIONS: There were significant clinical and demographic differences at presentation between FEP patients who received different clinical diagnoses at 1 year. Future work should determine the extent to which these differences can be used to guide clinical care.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis , Schizophrenia/diagnosis , Analysis of Variance , Bipolar Disorder/complications , Demography , Depressive Disorder, Major , Early Intervention, Educational , Female , Humans , London , Male , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Psychotic Disorders/complications , Schizophrenia/complications , Sex Factors , Young Adult
2.
Early Interv Psychiatry ; 13(4): 841-847, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29696781

ABSTRACT

AIM: Duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) is considered as a key prognostic variable in psychosis. Yet, it is unclear whether a longer DUP causes worse outcomes or whether reported associations have alternative explanations. METHODS: Data from 2 cohorts of patients with first episode psychosis were used (n = 2134). Measures of DUP were assessed at baseline and outcomes at 12 months. Regression models were used to investigate the associations between DUP and outcomes. We also investigated whether any associations were replicated using instrumental variables (IV) analysis to reduce the effect of residual confounding and measurement bias. RESULTS: There were associations between DUP per 1-year increase and positive psychotic symptoms (7.0% in symptom score increase 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.0%, 10.0%, P < .001), worse recovery (risk difference [RD] 0.78, 95%, CI 0.68, 0.83, P < .001) and worse global functioning (0.62 decrease in functioning score 95% CI -1.19, -0.04, P = .035). There was no evidence of an association with negative psychotic symptoms (1.0%, 95%, CI -2.0%, 5.0%, P = .455). The IV analysis showed weaker evidence of associations in the same direction between DUP per 1-year increase and positive psychotic symptoms, recovery and global functioning. However, there was evidence of an inverse association with negative psychotic symptoms (decrease of 15.0% in symptom score 95% CI -26.0%, -3.0%, P = .016). CONCLUSIONS: We have confirmed previous findings of a positive association between positive psychotic symptoms, global functioning and recovery and DUP using regression analysis. IV analysis shows some support for these findings. Future investigation using IV analysis should be repeated in large data sets.


Subject(s)
Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis , Psychotic Disorders/therapy , Time-to-Treatment , Female , Humans , Male , Prognosis , Regression Analysis , Time Factors , Young Adult
3.
Early Interv Psychiatry ; 13(3): 443-452, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29148264

ABSTRACT

AIM: Negative symptoms (NS) have been associated with poor outcome and remain difficult to treat in patients with psychosis. This study examined the association of NS with clinical features at first presentation to mental health services for psychosis and with outcomes at 1-year follow-up. METHODS: Clinical data were utilized from five London Early Intervention Services (EIS) included in the MiData audit database. The sample comprised 484 first-episode psychosis patients with complete Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale data at baseline and 1-year follow-up. Multiple imputation (N = 50) was conducted to account for missing follow-up data. RESULTS: Baseline NS were associated with male gender (B = -1.63, P < .05), younger age at onset (B = -.15, P <. 05), a higher level of impairment on the Global Assessment of Functioning (disability) Scale at baseline (B = -.19, P <. 010), an absence of reported substance misuse prior to baseline assessment (B = -3.05, P <. 001) and unemployment at baseline (B = -.93, P <. 01). At 1-year follow-up, NS at presentation were associated with worse Global Assessment of Functioning Scale for symptom (B = -.28, P < .01) and disability (B = -.27, P <. 05) and with hospital admission (OR = 1.06, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Negative symptoms at presentation to EIS were associated with worse functioning at entry and poorer outcomes 1 year later. Future research is required to better understand the aetiology and trajectories of NS in early psychosis and propose novel targeted interventions.


Subject(s)
Early Medical Intervention/statistics & numerical data , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Age of Onset , Disability Evaluation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , London , Male , Psychotic Disorders/complications , Sex Factors , Substance-Related Disorders/complications , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Unemployment , Young Adult
4.
Early Interv Psychiatry ; 11(3): 215-223, 2017 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25808132

ABSTRACT

AIM: Men and women have historically been shown to differ in their presentation and outcome of psychotic disorders and thus are likely to have different treatment needs. It is unclear whether Early Intervention Services (EIS) are able to provide equitable care for both men and women presenting for the first time with psychosis. The main aim of this study was to explore gender differences for first-presentation psychosis patients at the time of their referral to inner-city EIS and their outcomes 1 year later. METHODS: Audit data were utilized from 1098 first-presentation psychosis patients from seven EIS across London, UK, collected via the computerized MiData package. Binary logistic regression was employed to detect potential associations between gender and (i) initial clinical presentation (including duration of untreated psychosis, pathways to care, risk behaviours); and (ii) 1-year clinical and functional outcomes. RESULTS: At entry to EIS, male patients presented with more violent behaviour whereas female patients had more suicide attempts. Following 1 year of EIS care, men still presented as more violent towards others whereas women were more likely to have been admitted to a psychiatric ward. CONCLUSION: Gender differences in clinical outcome, service use and risk behaviours were apparent within the first year of specialist psychosis care. This may be partly due to the different pathways to care taken by men and women and differences in clinical presentation. Greater focus on the specific needs of each gender by EIS in detection and intervention is required to improve equality of outcome.


Subject(s)
Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Psychotic Disorders , Sex Characteristics , Female , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Male , Risk Factors , Time-to-Treatment , Urban Population , Young Adult
5.
Early Interv Psychiatry ; 9(6): 447-58, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26104585

ABSTRACT

AIM: Work and educational activities are an important part of recovery for young people with psychosis, and improving vocational outcomes is a key target for early intervention services (EIS). This study evaluated predictors of vocational activity for first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients during the first year of EIS care. It was hypothesized that longer duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) and minority ethnic status would predict poorer vocational outcomes, whereas a history of good vocational functioning would predict better vocational functioning during follow up. METHODS: FEP patients aged 14-35 years, who presented to seven EIS in London, UK, between 2003 and 2010, were followed for 1 year. Sociodemographic, clinical and vocational information (qualifications obtained and paid employment) were collected using the MiData audit tool at entry to EIS and 1 year later. RESULTS: Approximately one-third of patients (n = 345/1013) were studying or employed at some point during the first year of EIS care. Baseline vocational activity was the strongest predictor of vocational functioning during 1 year of follow up. Moreover, employment prior to entry into EIS strongly predicted change in vocational activity during 1 year of follow up. Individuals with DUP <6 months or of Asian or black African origin were more likely to be studying than their white British counterparts. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that a significant proportion of FEP patients are able to engage in meaningful vocational activities even within the first year of EIS care. However, services need to focus more resources on getting patients with poor educational or employment histories into training programmes to improve their vocational outcomes.


Subject(s)
Early Medical Intervention/methods , Mental Health Services , Psychotic Disorders/rehabilitation , Rehabilitation, Vocational/psychology , Rehabilitation, Vocational/statistics & numerical data , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Ethnicity/psychology , Female , Humans , London , Male , Time Factors , Young Adult
6.
Schizophr Res ; 150(2-3): 526-32, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24025696

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Duration of Untreated Psychosis (DUP) is an important measure associated with outcome of psychosis. This first study in the UK compared DUP between adolescent and adult-onset individuals and explored whether the adolescent-onset group showed variations in DUP that could be accounted for by sociodemographic and selected risk factors. METHODS: This naturalistic cohort study included 940 new first-episode psychosis cases aged 14-35years (136 adolescent-onset versus 804 adult-onset psychotic individuals) referred to nine Early Intervention Services for Psychosis in London (2003-2009). Sociodemographic characteristics, age of onset, family history of mental illness, duration of untreated psychosis, suicidality and substance use information were collected at entry to the services. RESULTS: Adolescents presented with significantly greater median DUP (179days) than adults (81days, p=0.005). Large differences in DUP were found amongst adolescent ethnic groups (median DUP: White: 454days; Black: 103days; Asian and mixed: 28.5days). In addition, younger age of onset and higher lifetime cannabis use were associated with longer treatment delay amongst adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: This study of DUP in adolescent-onset psychosis found it to be approximately twice the length of DUP amongst adults. For the adolescent White sub-group, DUP was far greater than the UK Department of Health target (<3months). Both the high rates of lifetime cannabis use and the lower age of onset might explain the long DUP in this ethnic group. Physicians need to be particularly vigilant about identifying and managing early psychosis in adolescents.


Subject(s)
Age of Onset , Psychotic Disorders/ethnology , Adolescent , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Asian People , Black People , Chi-Square Distribution , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis , Psychotic Disorders/therapy , White People , Young Adult
7.
Br J Psychiatry ; 202(4): 277-83, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22955006

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ethnic variations have previously been identified in the duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) and pathways into psychiatric services. These have not been examined in the context of early intervention services, which may alter these trajectories. AIMS: To explore ethnic differences in the nature and duration of pathways into early intervention services. METHOD: In a naturalistic cohort study, data were collected for 1024 individuals with psychotic disorders accepted for case management by eight London early intervention services. RESULTS: Duration of untreated psychosis was prolonged in the White British group compared with most other ethnic groups. White British individuals were more likely to make contact with their general practitioner and less likely to be seen within emergency medical services. All Black patient groups were more likely than their White British counterparts to experience involvement of criminal justice agencies. CONCLUSIONS: Variations continue to exist in how and when individuals from different ethnic groups access early intervention services. These may account for disparities in DUP.


Subject(s)
Early Medical Intervention , Ethnicity/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Psychotic Disorders/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Cohort Studies , Humans , Male , Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis , Time Factors
8.
Br J Psychiatry ; 188: 37-45, 2006 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16388068

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The provision of early intervention services for people with psychosis is UK government policy, although evidence for benefit of such services is sparse. AIMS: To evaluate the effects of a service providing specialised care for early psychosis (the Lambeth Early Onset Team) on clinical and social outcomes, and on service user satisfaction. METHOD: One hundred and forty-four people with psychosis, presenting to mental health services for the first or second time (if previously failed to engage in treatment), were randomly allocated to care by the early onset team or to standard care. Information was obtained on symptoms, treatment adherence, social and vocational functioning, satisfaction and quality of life. Relapse and rehospitalisation data have been reported separately. RESULTS: Outcomes for the participants treated by the early onset team were significantly better at 18 months for aspects of social and vocational functioning, satisfaction, quality of life and medication adherence. Symptom improvement did not significantly differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The provision of specialised care for early psychosis can achieve better outcomes. The study therefore provides support for current policy.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Psychotic Disorders/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Community Mental Health Services , Female , Ill-Housed Persons , Humans , Male , Patient Compliance , Patient Satisfaction , Psychotic Disorders/rehabilitation , Quality of Life , Time Factors , United Kingdom
9.
BMJ ; 329(7474): 1067, 2004 Nov 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15485934

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a service for early psychosis. DESIGN: Randomised controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Community mental health teams in one London borough. PARTICIPANTS: 144 people aged 16-40 years presenting to mental health services for the first or second time with non-organic, non-affective psychosis. INTERVENTIONS: Assertive outreach with evidence based biopsychosocial interventions (specialised care group) and standard care (control group) delivered by community mental health teams. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of relapse and readmission to hospital. RESULTS: Compared with patients in the standard care group, those in the specialised care group were less likely to relapse (odds ratio 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.22 to 0.97), were readmitted fewer times (beta 0.39, 0.10 to 0.68), and were less likely to drop out of the study (odds ratio 0.35, 0.15 to 0.81). When rates were adjusted for sex, previous psychotic episode, and ethnicity, the difference in relapse was no longer significant (odds ratio 0.55, 0.24 to 1.26); only total number of readmissions (beta 0.36, 0.04 to 0.66) and dropout rates (beta 0.28, 0.12 to 0.73) remained significant. CONCLUSIONS: Limited evidence shows that a team delivering specialised care for patients with early psychosis is superior to standard care for maintaining contact with professionals and for reducing readmissions to hospital. No firm conclusions can, however, be drawn owing to the modest sample size.


Subject(s)
Psychotic Disorders/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Community Mental Health Services , Humans , London , Patient Care Team , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Recurrence , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...