Nurses' attitudes, beliefs and knowledge of sleep health in residential aged care: An integrative literature review.

AIM: To identify, synthesize and evaluate primary research on registered nurses' (RN) knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about sleep health and sleep health management of older adults living in residential aged care. DESIGN: Integrative review. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase and CINAHL databases from inception to September 2023. REVIEW METHODS: Databases were searched using a combination of key words, subject heading terms. All abstracts and full-text articles were screened by two researchers. Qualitative synthesis of the included articles was conducted. Inductive content analysis was used to identify themes and analyse data. RESULTS: A total of 923 abstracts were screened resulting in a final yield of 13 articles. Three themes were identified: (i) RN experience with sleep-disturbed residents, (ii) the emotional burden of sleep disturbances on RN and, (iii) organizational barriers to promoting resident's healthy sleep. Inappropriate administration of benzodiazepines and psychotropic drugs to manage residents' sleep disturbances was a major issue and lack of resources in residential aged care to facilitate sleep. There were concerns on nursing activity that disturbed residents' sleep and striking a balance between facilitating sleep and meeting managerial expectations was challenging. CONCLUSION: This review identified that nurses' decision-making has an integral role in the management of sleep health in residents in aged care. Whilst evidence-based guidelines for managing sleep in residential aged care are available, there is a lack of translation to practice. Understanding RN perspectives is critical to improving sleep health models of care in residential aged care. IMPACT: This review found that RN are attuned to the implications of sleep disturbance in residential aged care but are constrained by current sleep health models of care. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Not applicable.

Comparative Effectiveness of Supine Avoidance versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Treating Supine-isolated Sleep Apnea: A Clinical Trial.

Rationale: About 20-35% of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) have supine-isolated OSA, for which supine sleep avoidance could be an effective therapy. However, traditional supine discomfort-based methods show poor tolerance and compliance to treatment and so cannot be recommended. Supine alarm devices show promise, but evidence to support favorable adherence to treatment and effectiveness at reducing excessive daytime sleepiness compared with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) remains limited. Objectives: To establish if alarm-based supine-avoidance treatment in patients with supine-isolated OSA is noninferior to CPAP in reducing daytime sleepiness. Methods: After baseline questionnaire administration and in-home supine-time and polysomnography assessments, patients with supine-isolated OSA and Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores ⩾8 were randomized to ⩾6 weeks of supine-avoidance or CPAP treatment, followed by crossover to the remaining treatment with repeat assessments. Noninferiority was assessed from change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale with supine avoidance compared with CPAP using a prespecified noninferiority margin of 1.5. Average nightly treatment use over all nights and treatment efficacy and effectiveness at reducing respiratory disturbances were also compared between treatments. Results: The reduction in sleepiness score with supine avoidance (mean [95% confidence interval], -1.9 [-2.8 to -1.0]) was noninferior to that with CPAP (-2.4 [-3.3 to -1.4]) (supine avoidance-CPAP difference, -0.4 [-1.3 to 0.6]), and the lower confidence limit did not cross the noninferiority margin of 1.5 (P = 0.021). Average treatment use was higher with supine avoidance compared with CPAP (mean ± standard deviation, 5.7 ± 2.4 vs. 3.9 ± 2.7 h/night; P < 0.001). Conclusions: In patients with supine-isolated OSA, vibrotactile supine alarm device therapy is noninferior to CPAP for reducing sleepiness and shows superior treatment adherence. Clinical trial registered with www.anzctr.org.au (ACTRN 12613001242718).

Embedding digital sleep health into primary care practice: A triangulation of perspectives from general practitioners, nurses, and pharmacists.

Introduction: While digital health interventions (DHIs) can potentially address the unmet needs for sleep health services, little is known about their implementation in practice. The current study aimed to explore primary care health providers' attitudes and beliefs towards DHIs for sleep and implementation into practice. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was administered to Australian primary care health professionals: general practitioners (GPs), community nurses, and community pharmacists. Semi-structured interviews were conducted within a sub-sample of participants exploring their experiences with DHIs and perceived barriers/facilitators for embedding DHIs into primary care. Semi-structured interviews were thematically analysed using the framework approach to contextualise survey findings. Results: Ninety-six surveys were returned (GPs = 36, nurses = 30, and pharmacists = 30) and 45 interviews conducted (GPs = 17, nurses = 14, and pharmacists = 14). From the survey, GPs were more likely to endorse familiarity (p = 0.009) and use (p < 0.001) of sleep DHIs in clinical practice than pharmacists and nurses. GPs were more interested in utilising the diagnostic features within a sleep DHI (p = 0.009) compared to other professionals. Thematic analysis of the interviews revealed three major themes, contextualised by profession: (1) Scope for DHIs in Current Practice, (2) Practice Gaps and Training Needs, and (3) Envisioning a Model of Care Using Sleep DHIs. While DHIs can potentially improve care, greater clarity of care pathways and reimbursement structures are needed for integration into practice. Conclusion: Primary care health professionals highlighted the training, care pathway and financial models required to realise the potential for translating findings from efficacy studies for DHIs into primary care to optimise sleep health.