Automatic dispersion, defect, curing, and thermal characteristics determination of polymer composites using micro-scale infrared thermography and machine learning algorithm.

Infrared thermography is a non-destructive technique that can be exploited in many fields including polymer composite investigation. Based on emissivity and thermal diffusivity variation; components, defects, and curing state of the composite can be identified. However, manual processing of thermal images that may contain significant artifacts, is prone to erroneous component and property determination. In this study, thermal images of different graphite/graphene-based polymer composites fabricated by hand, planetary, and batch mixing techniques were analyzed through an automatic machine learning model. Filler size, shape, and location can be identified in polymer composites and thus, the dispersion of different samples was quantified with a resolution of ~ 20 µm despite having artifacts in the thermal image. Thermal diffusivity comparison of three mixing techniques was performed for 40% graphite in the elastomer. Batch mixing demonstrated superior dispersion than planetary and hand mixing as the dispersion index (DI) for batch mixing was 0.07 while planetary and hand mixing showed 0.0865 and 0.163 respectively. Curing was investigated for a polymer with different fillers (PDMS took 500 s while PDMS-Graphene and PDMS Graphite Powder took 800 s to cure), and a thermal characteristic curve was generated to compare the composite quality. Therefore, the above-mentioned methods with machine learning algorithms can be a great tool to analyze composite both quantitatively and qualitatively.

Evaluating the impact of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy with tolvaptan to monitor liver safety in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

Background: On approval of JYNARQUE (tolvaptan) for use in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) at risk for rapid progression, the US Food and Drug Administration required a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) from the sponsor, which includes collection of post marketing liver safety data. Methods: This is a retrospective interim analysis of the ongoing REMS. The period evaluated was from REMS implementation (14 May 2018) at tolvaptan commercialization to the analysis cutoff date (23 February 2021). Patients were previously tolvaptan-naïve and initiated tolvaptan in the post marketing setting. Reports of possible severe drug-induced liver injury (DILI) were evaluated for severity based on the evidence obtained (e.g. liver enzyme levels, symptoms, diagnostic tests and event outcomes). The incidence of DILI was compared between the REMS and tolvaptan clinical trials in ADPKD. Results: Among 6711 REMS patients, 60 (0.9%) cases of possible severe DILI were reported, 4 of which were confirmed as serious and potentially fatal by the sponsor. One of these four patients met Hy's law criteria. In all four patients, liver enzymes normalized after tolvaptan discontinuation. The duration of tolvaptan exposure in the REMS is currently shorter than in completed clinical trials, but within this limitation, the incidence of possible severe DILI was lower in the REMS than in clinical trials (incidence rate ratio 0.587; P = .000411). Conclusions: In interim data on >6000 tolvaptan REMS patients, <1% experienced possible severe DILI. Monthly monitoring, as described in the tolvaptan prescribing information, enables the prompt detection of liver enzyme abnormalities and appropriate drug discontinuation.

Using Tolvaptan to Treat Hyponatremia: Results from a Post-authorization Pharmacovigilance Study.

INTRODUCTION: Hyponatremia is a common condition of varying etiology among hospitalized patients and is associated with adverse outcomes. Treatment to normalize serum sodium is advisable. Tolvaptan received European Union marketing authorization for hyponatremia secondary to the syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH). Post-marketing pharmacovigilance activities were required to characterize the safety profile of tolvaptan more fully in this population, which is often elderly with a high burden of comorbid illness. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational, multinational, post-authorization pharmacovigilance study (NCT01228682) in seven European countries. Hospitalized patients were enrolled who received tolvaptan for hyponatremia associated with SIADH and consented to data collection. Tolvaptan was initiated and assessments performed at physician discretion per local standards of care. To reflect actual clinical practice, no assessments or procedures were required outside the standard of care. Patients who continued to receive long-term tolvaptan following hospital discharge and provided consent received follow-up from their community physicians. RESULTS: A total of 252 patients (mean age 70.6 years) enrolled. Mean tolvaptan treatment duration was 139.4 days, median 18.5 (range 1-1130) days; most frequent dose was 15 mg/day (used in 75% of patients). Serum sodium increased from baseline (mean 123.2 mmol/l) during treatment week 1 and remained stable during follow-up, with little difference across doses of 7.5, 15, and 30 mg/day. Hyponatremia symptoms (e.g., confusion, unsteady gait, lethargy) were present in 122/252 (48.4%) patients at pre-treatment baseline, decreasing to 46/252 (18.3%) during treatment. Sixty-two patients (24.6%; mean baseline serum sodium 120 mmol/l) experienced rapid correction of hyponatremia within 72 h. No osmotic demyelination syndrome occurred. CONCLUSION: In clinical practice, tolvaptan improved serum sodium and decreased hyponatremia symptoms in hyponatremia secondary to SIADH. Serum sodium should be monitored during treatment to minimize risk of rapid correction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01228682.

Hospitalized patients often experience abnormally low blood sodium levels (hyponatremia), which can cause significant symptoms and poses a serious health risk (Wald et al. in Arch Intern Med 170:294­302, 2010). Yet, increasing sodium levels too rapidly in these patients can unintentionally cause osmotic demyelination syndrome, resulting in long-term neurologic damage or death. Tolvaptan was approved in the European Union to treat one type of hyponatremia caused by a hormonal imbalance known as the syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH). Tolvaptan effectively increased patient sodium levels in clinical trials, but real-world data are needed to understand tolvaptan treatment more fully in everyday clinical practice. We evaluated patterns of use, efficacy, and safety of tolvaptan in patients treated in hospitals and after discharge for hyponatremia due to SIADH. Tolvaptan was correctly used to treat only hyponatremia caused by SIADH in nearly all of the 252 patients studied. Patient sodium levels increased in the first week of tolvaptan treatment and then stabilized. Hyponatremia symptoms, such as confusion, nausea, tiredness, and dizziness, were present in 48.4% of patients before treatment and in 18.3% after starting tolvaptan. Consistent with earlier studies, some patients (24.6%) experienced excessively rapid correction of hyponatremia. However, no subsequent neurologic problems or deaths were attributed to the rapid correction, which suggests that medical providers were carefully monitoring and managing sodium levels to prevent serious consequences. Our study indicates that tolvaptan is being used safely and effectively to treat hyponatremia due to SIADH in a patient population with complex medical needs.

Increasing Efficiency and Cost-Effectiveness by Automating the Authoring of the Development Safety Update Report.

INTRODUCTION: A Development Safety Update Report (DSUR) is a comprehensive review of safety information collected during an annual reporting period for an investigational drug. The creation of a DSUR is a resource-intensive process, requiring effective communication among, and collaboration with, various functional stakeholders. OBJECTIVE: To increase the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of generating a DSUR with the use of an electronic authoring platform. This computerized platform auto-populates the DSUR template using available source data. METHOD: Requirements for the DSUR authoring tool were developed, and available data sources were mapped to respective sections of a company DSUR template. The DSUR authoring tool, mined, scanned, and extracted the relevant data from multiple-input source documents using Natural Language Processing logic. The data were then auto-populated into the template, as required by regulatory guidance ICH-E2F, with different text options based on questions and answers. The time- and cost-savings gained through automation were analyzed for DSURs authored during 2017-2019. RESULTS: The DSUR contains 31 sections (20 main sections and 11 sub-sections), of which 9 were fully automated, 12 were partially automated, and 10 were not automated in this release of the automation tool. Use of the DSUR automation tool resulted in a time-savings of approximately 25% per report, corresponding to a cost saving of US$4550 per report. CONCLUSION: Deployment of the automation tool reduced the time and cost required to manually produce DSURs, as well as improved the quality, compliance, and consistency of company-prepared DSURs. This tool enhanced the potential of the organization to generate larger volumes of DSURs in a timely manner, without requiring additional resources or compromising quality. This or a similar authoring automation tool could be employed in the future to generate other regulatory submission documents, which also require various source documents and cross-functional contributions.

Using an Automated Algorithm to Identify Potential Drug-Induced Liver Injury Cases in a Pharmacovigilance Database.

INTRODUCTION: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is the most frequent cause of acute liver failure in North America and Europe, but it is often missed because of unstandardized diagnostic methods and criteria. This study aimed to develop and validate an automated algorithm to identify potential DILI cases in routine pharmacovigilance (PV) activities. METHODS: Post-marketing hepatic adverse events reported for a potentially hepatotoxic drug in a global PV database from 19 March 2017 to 18 June 2018 were assessed manually and with the automated algorithm. The algorithm provided case assessments by applying pre-specified criteria to all case data and narratives simultaneously. RESULTS: A total of 1456 cases were included for analysis and assessed manually. Sufficient data for algorithm assessment were available for 476 cases (32.7%). Of these cases, manual assessment identified 312 (65.5%) potential DILI cases while algorithm assessment identified 305 (64.1%) potential DILI cases. Comparison of manual and algorithm assessments demonstrated a sensitivity of 97.8% and a specificity of 79.3% for the algorithm. Given the prevalence of potential DILI cases in the population studied, the algorithm was calculated to have positive predictive value 56.3% and negative predictive value 99.2%. The time required for manual review compared to algorithm review suggested that application of the algorithm prior to manual screening would have resulted in a time savings of 42.2%. CONCLUSION: An automated algorithm to identify potential DILI cases was developed and successfully implemented. The algorithm demonstrated a high sensitivity, a high negative predictive value, along with significant efficiency and utility in a real-time PV database.

Estimates of resource transfer via winged adult insects from the hyporheic zone in a gravel-bed river.

Hyporheic zone (HZ) locates below the riverbed providing habitat for macroinvertebrates from where the winged adult insects (i.e., hyporheic insects, HIs) emerge and bring out aquatic resources to the riparian zone. This study estimated mean daily flux as dry biomass (BM), carbon (C), and nitrogen (N) deriving from the dominant HI species Alloperla ishikariana (Plecoptera, Chloroperlidae) for a 4th-order gravel-bed river during the early-summer to summer periods. We hypothesized that HIs were an important contributor in total aquatic resources to the riparian zone. In 2017 and 2018, we set parallelly (May to August) and perpendicularly (June to October) oriented Malaise traps to catch the lateral and longitudinal directional dispersing winged adults of A. ishikariana, and other Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera, and Diptera from the river and estimated the directional fluxes of them. We further split the directional fluxes as moving away or back to the channel (for lateral) and from down- to upstream or up- to downstream (for longitudinal). Alloperla ishikariana was similar to other Plecoptera species and differed clearly from Ephemeroptera and Trichoptera in directional characteristics of resources flux, suggesting that the extent and directions of HZ-derived resource transfer depend on taxon-specific flight behaviors of HIs. Contributions of A. ishikariana to the riparian zone in total aquatic C and N transfer seasonally varied and were lower in May (5%-6%) and August (2%-4%) and the highest in July (52%-70%). These conservative estimates largely increased (9% in May) after the supplementary inclusion of Diptera (Chironomidae and Tipulidae), part of which were considered HIs. We demonstrated that HZ could seasonally contribute a significant portion of aquatic resources to the riparian zone and highlighted the potential importance of HZ in nutrient balance in the river-riparian ecosystem.

Effectiveness Evaluation of Additional Risk Minimization Measures for Adolescent Use of Aripiprazole in the European Union: Results from a Post-Authorization Safety Study.

INTRODUCTION: Two risk minimization (RM) tools-a healthcare professional frequently asked questions (HCP-FAQs) brochure and a patient/caregiver information brochure (PCIB)-were developed for HCPs and for adolescents (aged ≥ 13 years) receiving aripiprazole for bipolar I mania and their caregivers. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effectiveness of these RM tools in improving the awareness and education of HCPs and patients/caregivers. METHOD: The RM tools were distributed to HCPs (identified in agreement with the marketing authorization holder [MAH] and local regulatory authorities), who in turn distributed the PCIBs to patients/caregivers. A web-based survey was then conducted targeting HCPs and patients/caregivers. RESULTS: The response rate was low: 118 of 23,282 invited HCPs and 16 patients/caregivers completed the survey. Overall, 42% (49/118) of HCP respondents were aware of aripiprazole RM tools; of these, 59% (29/49) of HCPs read them at least once and 66% (19/29) of these used the RM tools while discussing the benefit-risk profile of aripiprazole with patients/caregivers. In total, 30 of the 118 HCPs (25%) were aware of the PCIB, and 26 distributed it to their patients/caregivers, whereas seven HCPs advised them to read the brochure. Overall, 15 of the 16 patients/caregivers were aware of the PCIB, and 13 read/referred to it. Of these, 12 found the PCIB useful, and five monitored their weight while receiving aripiprazole and reported potential risks immediately to their HCP. CONCLUSION: The response rate to the survey was low, and the tools displayed limited utility and effectiveness in improving awareness and education in a small number of responders. Therefore, the aripiprazole risk management plan was amended, and the tools were discontinued.

Categorization of infliximab dose changes and healthcare utilization and expenditures for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in commercially insured and Medicare-eligible populations.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how changes in infliximab dose influence resource utilization and expenditures for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis using claims from January 1, 1999 through March 31, 2005 in the MedStat MarketScan databases for RA patients who had an increase, decrease, or no change in infliximab dose within 1 year of initiating therapy. Eligibility criteria included at least one claim with a diagnosis of RA and no biologic treatment within 6 months before the index infliximab claim, continuous health plan enrollment (commercial or Medicare) for 6 months before and 12 months after the index date, and three consecutive infliximab infusions. The index and final infliximab doses were estimated from claims data. RESULTS: Data were included for 1678 commercially insured patients and 616 Medicare-eligible patients; 45.4% and 39.3%, respectively, had an increase in dose, 24.7% and 43.2%, respectively, had a decrease in dose, and 29.9% and 17.5%, respectively, had no change in dose. Overall, resource utilization was higher in the increase-in-dose groups and lower in the no change-in-dose groups when compared with the decrease-in-dose groups for both cohorts. Medical costs were also highest for the increase-in-dose groups for both cohorts. Pharmacy expenditures for the no-change-in-dose groups were lower than the decrease-in-dose groups in both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: An increase in dose was the most common dose change for the commercial cohort, while a decrease in dose was the most common dose change for the Medicare-eligible cohort. Patients with an increase in dose had the highest utilization and expenditures while those with no change in dose had the lowest levels. The nature of this utilization needs to be examined to better understand how dosing changes may influence medical utilization. Changes in dose were defined by the difference between the first and final doses and may not have captured changes in interim doses.

An exploratory analysis of healthcare costs and utilization of pediatric patients with Crohn's disease.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the healthcare costs and resource utilization associated with pediatric Crohn's disease (PCD) from a payer perspective. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using claims from 1 January 2003 through 31 December 2006 from the HealthCare Partners database. Patients were younger than 18 years of age, had a new diagnosis of PCD, and continuous health plan eligibility 6 months before and 12 months after the disease index date (the date of the first claim with a PCD diagnosis). For comparison, a non-PCD cohort was matched on age, sex, and birthday (within 30 days). RESULTS: Data from 30 patients with PCD and 10,864 non-PCD controls were included. The total cost per member per month (PMPM) for the PCD cohort was $2,547 compared with $101 for the non-PCD cohort. Inpatient admissions accounted for the largest portion (54%) of the total cost PMPM for PCD patients. There were 500 admissions per thousand members per year (PTMPY) for the PCD cohort and 11 admissions PTMPY for the non-PCD cohort. The average lengths of stay were 7.6 and 4.4 days for the PCD cohort and the non-PCD cohort, respectively, and the inpatient costs PMPM were $1,409 and $18, respectively. Costs and resource utilization were also higher for PCD patients treated with systemic therapies. CONCLUSION: PCD was associated with higher costs and resource utilization, compared with non-PCD controls, primarily driven by inpatient stays. Treating PCD appropriately before the disease progresses to a level requiring hospitalization may help reduce the costs associated with this disease.

Treatment persistence with adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab in combination with methotrexate and the effects on health care costs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) biologic agents are effective in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Information on patient persistence with biologic anti-TNF therapies is limited, and the effects of persistence on the costs of therapy are unknown. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to compare treatment persistence with adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab in combination withmethotrexate (MTX) and evaluate the effects of persistence on overall health care costs. METHODS: This retrospective study used data from the PharMetrics managed care administrative claims database. Data from patients with RA who received combination treatment with an anti-TNF agent plus MTX and had > or = 24 months of continuous plan eligibility were collected. The 3 anti-TNF cohorts were adalimumab + MTX (adalimumab group), etanercept + MTX (etanercept group), and infliximab + MTX (infliximab group). Treatment persistence was defined as the number of days between the first and last anti-TNF treatment and was reported as a percentage of the 1-year period after treatment initiation. Costs were compared between patients with treatment persistence rates > or = 80% or <80%. Demographics, comorbidities, disease severity, and RA-related costs were assessed using descriptive statistics. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to identify differences in mean persistence between the 3 cohorts. RESULTS: Data from 1242 patients were included (77.7% female; mean age, 50.0 years). The mean persistence rate in the overall population was 74.6%, and the mean treatment time was 272.3 days. The infliximab group had a higher persistence rate compared with the etanercept and adalimumab groups (78.0% vs 72.8% and 70.8%, respectively; P < 0.005). In all patients combined, those with treatment persistence > or = 80% had higher mean total health care costs compared with those with treatment persistence <80% ($19,271.52 vs $15,598.46; P < 0.001), largely due to higher pharmacy costs. However, nonpharmacy costs were lower in the > or = 80% persistence cohort ($3091 vs $4601; P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: In this population of patients with RA, overall treatment persistence was high, with patients treated with infliximab + MTX having significantly higher persistence compared with those treated with adalimumab + MTX or etanercept + MTX. While pharmacy costs were higher in patients with > or = 80% persistence, nonpharmacy costs were lower.

Effects of fistula on healthcare costs and utilization for patients with Crohn's disease treated in a managed care environment.

BACKGROUND: Fistulas are a common complication of Crohn's disease (CD) and are difficult to treat effectively. This study aimed to assess the effects of fistula on annual costs of healthcare and resource utilization for patients with CD. METHODS: A retrospective analysis, using the PharMetrics database, of patients with a diagnosis of CD from January 1, 2000 through June 30, 2005 was conducted. Using paid claim amounts, healthcare costs and resource utilization were compared for patients with and without fistula in the year following diagnosis. Further analysis compared costs for adult, pediatric, and older adult patients with and without fistula. RESULTS: This analysis included 13,454 patients with CD, of whom 12,683 (94.3%) had no diagnosis of fistula. The total median (range) cost per patient was higher for the fistula cohort ($10,863 [$0-$1,307,019]) than the nonfistula cohort ($6268 [$0-$1,181,485]), driven mainly by higher hospital and surgery costs. Median healthcare costs and resource utilization rates were generally higher for patients with fistula compared with those without fistula in all 3 age groups, with some of the largest differences observed in the pediatric cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Fistulas are often a difficult and costly complication of CD. This study determined that patients with fistulizing CD have higher healthcare costs and resource consumption than patients without fistula. Use of therapies that heal fistulas may help deter some of the high costs and intensive resource utilization found in this study. Economic analyses need to account for these issues when assessing the cost-effectiveness of therapies targeting fistulizing disease.

Administrative claims analysis of all-cause annual costs of care and resource utilization by age category for ulcerative colitis patients.

BACKGROUND: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disease with peak incidence in the third decade of life and a second peak in the sixth or seventh decade. While drug therapy can be used to control the inflammation and reduce symptoms, patients with UC may be treated surgically. There is little information in the published literature evaluating the all-cause health care costs of patients with UC according to age. OBJECTIVE: To assess from administrative claims the direct all-cause (not disease-related) costs of care and resource utilization for patients with UC compared with members without UC by 3 age categories. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using the PharMetrics database of patients with a diagnosis of UC (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] code 556.x) from January 1, 2000, through June 30, 2005. This database contains enrollment data and pharmacy and medical claims from more than 85 different managed care organizations and more than 55 million patients in the United States. Patients had to be continuously enrolled for 6 months before and 12 months after the initial UC diagnosis and have at least 2 distinct claims with a diagnosis code for UC. The mean per-patient health care resource utilization and costs were calculated for patients in the year following their initial UC diagnosis and compared with the same measures for a group of age- and gender-matched members (without UC claims) at a ratio of 4:1. Three age groups were analyzed: pediatric-adolescent (aged < 18 years), adults (aged 18 to 64 years), and older adults (aged e 65 years). Differences in the measures of all-cause health care resource utilization (claims and costs) between the UC and non-UC groups were tested for statistical significance using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, a non-parametric alternative to the paired t test. Differences between the 3 age cohorts were tested using the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Data were collected for 15,105 patients with UC and for 59,159 members in the comparator cohort without UC matched by age and gender. The average age for both cohorts was 44 years, and 54% were female. Mean ([SD], median) annual all-cause total health care costs in 2005 dollars for patients with UC were $13,233 ([$40,715], $5,190) versus $3,214 ([$12,741], $753) for the comparator group (P < 0.001). For all UC patients, all-cause inpatient hospitalization costs constituted the largest component ($5,771, 43.6%) of the mean annual total costs, followed by prescription medications ($2,423, 18.3%); miscellaneous services, such as hospice, psychiatric facility, and nursing home care ($2,092, 15.8%); outpatient hospital visits ($1,310, 9.9%); physician office visits ($899, 6.8%); laboratory procedures ($470, 3.6%); and emergency department visits ($268, 2.0%). Resource utilization (e.g., physician visits, laboratory claims, pharmacy claims) was highest for older adults aged e 65 years, followed by pediatricadolescent patients and adults aged 18 to 64 years (all comparisons P < 0.01). The mean ([SD], median) all-cause total health care costs were highest for pediatric-adolescent patients with UC (n = 589, 3.9%) at $23,113 ([$70,999], $6,214), followed by older adults (n = 650, 4.3%) at $15,811 ([$23,882], $6,886, P < 0.001), while adults aged 18 to 64 years (n = 13,866, 91.8%) incurred the lowest cost at $12,693 ([$39,505], $5,108, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with UC identified from medical claims incurred significantly higher all-cause health care costs for all 3 age categories than did the comparator group of health plan members without diagnosis for UC.