Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Heliyon ; 9(3): e13846, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36873553

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Clostridioides difficile is the most common infectious agent of nosocomial diarrhea. C. difficile infection (CDI) pathogenesis and disease severity depend on its toxins (toxins A, B and binary) and on the host's immune response, especially the innate immune system. The current study examined the efficacy of macrophage activity, macrophages viability and cytokine secretion levelsin response to different sequence type (ST) strains of C. difficile. Methods: RAW 264.7 macrophages were exposed to six different strains of C. difficile as well as to both toxins A and B and macrophage viability was measured. The levels of four secreted cytokines were determined by RT-PCR and ELISA. Morphological changes to the macrophages were investigated by fluorescent microscopy. Results: Strains ST37 and ST42 affected macrophages' vitality the most. Toxins A and B led to a significant reduction in macrophages' vitality at most time points. In addition, starting at 30-min post-exposure to 5 ng/µl of both toxins led to significant differences in macrophage viability versus at lower concentrations. Furthermore, cytokine secretion levels, including IL-12, IL-6 and TNF-α, increased dramatically when macrophages were exposed to strains ST42 or ST104. Finally, gene expression surveys point to increases in IL-12 gene expression in response to both ST42 and ST104. Conclusions: C. difficile strains with higher toxins levels induced an increased activation of the innate immune system and may activate macrophages more profoundly resulting in secretion of higher levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines. However, higher toxin levels may also damage macrophages' normal skeletal structure, reducing macrophage viability.

2.
J Microbiol Methods ; 206: 106692, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36809809

ABSTRACT

Clostridioides difficile infection develops following ingestion of virulent stains by a susceptible host. Once germinated, toxins TcdA and TcdB, and in some of the strains binary toxin, are secreted, eliciting disease. Bile acids play a significant role in the process of spore germination and outgrowth, with cholate and its derivative enhancing colony formation, while chenodeoxycholate inhibit germination and outgrowth. This work investigated bile acids' impact on spore germination, toxin levels and biofilm formation in various strain types (STs). Thirty C. difficile isolates (A+ B+ CDT-\+) of different STs were exposed to increasing concentrations of the bile acids, cholic acid (CA), taurocholic acid (TCA) and chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA). Following treatments, spore germination was determined. Toxin concentrations were semi-quantified using the C. Diff Tox A/B II™ kit. Biofilm formation was detected by the microplate assay with crystal violet. SYTO® 9 and propidium iodide staining were used for live and dead cell detection, respectively, inside the biofilm. Toxins levels were increased by 1.5-28-fold in response to CA and by 1.5-20-fold in response to TCA, and decreased by 1-37-fold due to CDCA exposure. CA had a concentration-dependent effect on biofilm formation, with the low concentration (0.1%) inducing- and the higher concentrations inhibiting biofilm formation, while CDCA significantly reduced biofilm production at all concentrations. There were no differences in the bile acids effects on different STs. Further investigation might identify a specific bile acids' combination with inhibitory effects on C. difficile toxin and biofilm production, which could modulate toxin formation to reduce the likelihood of developing CDI.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Toxins , Clostridioides difficile , Bile Acids and Salts/pharmacology , Clostridioides , Taurocholic Acid/pharmacology , Biofilms , Bacterial Proteins
3.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol ; 11: 683464, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34422678

ABSTRACT

Background: Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) is one of the primary pathogens responsible for infectious diarrhea. Antibiotic treatment failure, occurring in about 30% of patients, and elevated rates of antibiotic resistance pose a major challenge for therapy. Reinfection often occurs by isolates that produce biofilm, a protective barrier impermeable to antibiotics. We explored the association between antibiotic resistance (in planktonic form) and biofilm-production in 123 C. difficile clinical isolates. Results: Overall, 66 (53.6%) out of 123 isolates produced a biofilm, with most of them being either a strong (44%) or moderate (34.8%) biofilm producers. When compared to susceptible isolates, a statistically higher percentage of isolates with reduced susceptibility to metronidazole or vancomycin were biofilm producers (p < 0.0001, for both antibiotics). Biofilm production intensity was higher among tolerant isolates; 53.1% of the metronidazole-susceptible isolates were not able to produce biofilms, and only 12.5% were strong biofilm-producers. In contrast, 63% of the isolates with reduced susceptibility had a strong biofilm-production capability, while 22.2% were non-producers. Among the vancomycin-susceptible isolates, 51% were unable to produce biofilms, while all the isolates with reduced vancomycin susceptibility were biofilm-producers. Additionally, strong biofilm production capacity was more common among the isolates with reduced vancomycin susceptibility, compared to susceptible isolates (72.7% vs. 18.8%, respectively). The distribution of biofilm capacity groups was statistically different between different Sequence-types (ST) strains (p =0.001). For example, while most of ST2 (66.7%), ST13 (60%), ST42 (80%) isolates were non-producers, most (75%) ST6 isolates were moderate producers and most of ST104 (57.1%) were strong producers. Conclusions: Our results suggest an association between reduced antibiotic susceptibility and biofilm production capacity. This finding reinforces the importance of antibiotic susceptibility testing, mainly in recurrence infections that may be induced by a strain that is both antibiotic tolerant and biofilm producer. Better adjustment of treatment in such cases may reduce recurrences rates and complications. The link of biofilm production and ST should be further validated; if ST can indicate on isolate virulence, then in the future, when strain typing methods will be more available to laboratories, ST determination may aid in indecision between supportive vs. aggressive treatment.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Clostridioides , Biofilms , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL