Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 73
Filter
1.
Patient Educ Couns ; 125: 108293, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728999

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a nurse-led decision coaching programme aiming to redistribute health professionals' tasks to support immunotherapy decision-making in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: Cluster-randomised controlled trial with an accompanying mixed methods process evaluation (2014 - 2018). We planned to recruit 300 people with clinically isolated syndrome or relapsing-remitting MS facing immunotherapy decisions in 15 clusters across Germany. Participants in the intervention clusters received up to three decision coaching sessions by a trained nurse and access to an evidence-based online information platform. In the control clusters, participants also had access to the information platform. The primary outcome was informed choice after six months, defined as good risk knowledge and congruent attitude and uptake. RESULTS: Twelve nurses from eight clusters participated in the decision coaching training. Due to insufficient recruitment, the randomised controlled trial was terminated prematurely with 125 participants (n = 42 intervention clusters, n = 83 control clusters). We found a non-significant difference between groups for informed choice favouring decision coaching: odds ratio 1.64 (95% CI 0.49-5.53). CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that decision coaching might facilitate informed decision-making in MS compared to providing patient information alone. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Barriers have to be overcome to achieve structural change and successful implementation.


Subject(s)
Decision Making , Multiple Sclerosis , Humans , Female , Male , Adult , Multiple Sclerosis/therapy , Germany , Middle Aged , Mentoring/methods , Cluster Analysis
3.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 63(1): 42-46, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37625778

ABSTRACT

The use of staples has been shown to be a reasonable fixation technique to achieve stability of a first MTPJ arthrodesis. Although it has been shown to be a weaker construct than crossed screws or plate and screw combinations, their ease of insertion, low profile, and stability make them a desirable choice for first MTPJ arthrodesis fixation. However, because of this relative weakness, the question remains whether immediate weightbearing when using staples is advisable. The aim of this study is to determine whether the use of 2 nickel-titanium alloy (NITINOL) staples, placed at 90 degrees to one another is a stable enough construct to support full, immediate weightbearing following first MTPJ arthrodesis. We performed a retrospective chart review of patients undergoing first MTPJ arthrodesis by a single surgeon utilizing 2 NITINOL staples placed at 90 degrees to one another. Patients were allowed to be fully weightbearing immediately postoperatively. Forty-seven of 50 (94%) patients achieved complete radiologic consolidation of fusion at 12 weeks, with only 3 requiring revision surgery for nonunion. All of the patients requiring revision surgery for nonunion, had preoperative diagnosis of hallux abducto valgus. We concluded that the use of 2 NITINOL staples placed at 90 degrees to one another is a viable option for first MTPJ arthrodesis, and immediate weightbearing does not increase rate of nonunion or incidence of revision surgery when compared to other fixation techniques.


Subject(s)
Hallux Rigidus , Hallux Valgus , Metatarsal Bones , Metatarsophalangeal Joint , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Metatarsal Bones/surgery , Hallux Rigidus/surgery , Hallux Valgus/diagnostic imaging , Hallux Valgus/surgery , Radiography , Arthrodesis/methods , Metatarsophalangeal Joint/diagnostic imaging , Metatarsophalangeal Joint/surgery , Weight-Bearing , Alloys
4.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 60: 103728, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35290898

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis treatment options are increasing. Evidence-based patient information (EBPI) are therefore crucial to enable patient involvement in decision making. Based on earlier work on decision support, patient information handbooks on 8 MS immunotherapies were developed, piloted and evaluated with support from the German Clinical Competence Network MS and the German MS Society. METHODS: Handbooks were structured according to EBPI concepts. Drafts were commented by patient representatives and neurologists with an MS expertise. Executive boards of the German MS Society and the Competence Network as well as pharmaceutical companies' feedback was included. Handbooks were distributed among MS neurologists by the German MS Society. Evaluation followed applying a mixed methods approach with interviews, focus groups and surveys. One survey addressed persons with MS (pwMS) based on a questionnaire included in each handbook. Neurologists who received printed patient handbooks were invited to give feedback in a second survey. RESULTS: Eight handbooks were developed providing absolute and relative risk information in numbers and figures as well as monitoring needs and drug fact boxes. Despite the high amount of information and the display of low absolute risk reduction rates of treatments, handbooks were overall appreciated by pwMS (n=107) and mostly also by physicians (n=24). For more than 70% of the pwMS the information was new, understandable and supportive for decision making. But patients felt uncomfortable with relative risk information. However, response rates in the evaluation were low, exposing the challenges when implementing EBPI into clinical care. Therefore, conclusions must be considered preliminary. CONCLUSION: EBPI on immunotherapies for MS seem feasible and are appreciated by patients and treating neurologists but more implementation research is needed.


Subject(s)
Multiple Sclerosis , Focus Groups , Humans , Immunotherapy , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Neurologists , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 55: 103182, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34358850

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Relapses of multiple sclerosis are burdensome events and entail potentially lasting loss of function. People with multiple sclerosis have to consider corticosteroids, providing limited benefits and the risk of adverse effects. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a questionnaire investigating the internal process of people with multiple sclerosis making decisions about corticosteroids. METHODS: The questionnaire is structured by three domains, attitude, subjective social norm, and perceived behavioural control, which according to the theory of planned behaviour determine action planning. The development is inspired by a previous questionnaire studying decisions on immunotherapy. The questionnaire was tested in qualitative think-aloud interviews (n=10) for feasibility and comprehensibility and in an online survey (n=203) to assess construct and criterion validity. RESULTS: The 18-item questionnaire was considered feasible and comprehensible. It predicted the intention to receive corticosteroids in up to 82.3% of cases. "Subjective social norm" impacted most on intention. The questionnaire also proved sensitive for autonomy preferences of people with multiple sclerosis. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the questionnaire appropriately explains the internal process people with multiple sclerosis run through when considering corticosteroids. It can be used to inform developments of tailored support for people with multiple sclerosis in making informed decisions about relapse management.


Subject(s)
Multiple Sclerosis , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Humans , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Recurrence , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
Eur J Neurol ; 27(8): 1510-1529, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32469447

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with severe, progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) have complex physical and psychosocial needs, typically over several years. Few treatment options are available to prevent or delay further clinical worsening in this population. The objective was to develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the palliative care of patients with severe, progressive MS. METHODS: This guideline was developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. Formulation of the clinical questions was performed in the Patients-Intervention-Comparator-Outcome format, involving patients, carers and healthcare professionals (HPs). No uniform definition of severe MS exists: in this guideline, constant bilateral support required to walk 20 m without resting (Expanded Disability Status Scale score > 6.0) or higher disability is referred to. When evidence was lacking for this population, recommendations were formulated using indirect evidence or good practice statements were devised. RESULTS: Ten clinical questions were formulated. They encompassed general and specialist palliative care, advance care planning, discussing with HPs the patient's wish to hasten death, symptom management, multidisciplinary rehabilitation, interventions for caregivers and interventions for HPs. A total of 34 recommendations (33 weak, 1 strong) and seven good practice statements were devised. CONCLUSIONS: The provision of home-based palliative care (either general or specialist) is recommended with weak strength for patients with severe, progressive MS. Further research on the integration of palliative care and MS care is needed. Areas that currently lack evidence of efficacy in this population include advance care planning, the management of symptoms such as fatigue and mood problems, and interventions for caregivers and HPs.


Subject(s)
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive , Advance Care Planning , Caregivers , Humans , Palliative Care
7.
Eur J Neurol ; 26(1): 41-50, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30035845

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patient and public involvement in clinical practice guideline development is recommended to increase guideline trustworthiness and relevance. The aim was to engage multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and caregivers in the definition of the key questions to be answered in the European Academy of Neurology guideline on palliative care of people with severe MS. METHODS: A mixed methods approach was used: an international online survey launched by the national MS societies of eight countries, after pilot testing/debriefing on 20 MS patients and 18 caregivers, focus group meetings of Italian and German MS patients and caregivers. RESULTS: Of 1199 participants, 951 (79%) completed the whole online survey and 934 from seven countries were analysed: 751 (80%) were MS patients (74% women, mean age 46.1) and 183 (20%) were caregivers (36% spouses/partners, 72% women, mean age 47.4). Participants agreed/strongly agreed on inclusion of the nine pre-specified topics (from 89% for 'advance care planning' to 98% for 'multidisciplinary rehabilitation'), and <5% replied 'I prefer not to answer' to any topic. There were 569 free comments: 182 (32%) on the pre-specified topics, 227 (40%) on additional topics (16 guideline-pertinent) and 160 (28%) on outcomes. Five focus group meetings (three of MS patients, two of caregivers, and overall 35 participants) corroborated the survey findings. In addition, they allowed an explanation of the guideline production process and the exploration of patient-important outcomes and of taxing issues. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple sclerosis patient and caregiver involvement was resource and time intensive, but rewarding. It was the key for the formulation of the 10 guideline questions and for the identification of patient-important outcomes.


Subject(s)
Caregivers , Guidelines as Topic , Multiple Sclerosis/therapy , Palliative Care/standards , Patients , Adult , Advance Care Planning , Aged , Community Participation , Europe , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Sclerosis/rehabilitation , Patient Care Team , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
8.
Int J Nurs Stud ; 78: 26-36, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28982479

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Treatment decision-making is complex for people with multiple sclerosis. Profound information on available options is virtually not possible in regular neurologist encounters. The "nurse decision coach model" was developed to redistribute health professionals' tasks in supporting immunotreatment decision-making following the principles of informed shared decision-making. OBJECTIVES: To test the feasibility of a decision coaching programme and recruitment strategies to inform the main trial. DESIGN: Feasibility testing and parallel pilot randomised controlled trial, accompanied by a mixed methods process evaluation. SETTING: Two German multiple sclerosis university centres. PARTICIPANTS PILOT TRIAL: People with suspected or relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis facing immunotreatment decisions on first line drugs were recruited. Randomisation to the intervention (n = 38) or control group (n = 35) was performed on a daily basis. Quantitative and qualitative process data were collected from people with multiple sclerosis, nurses and physicians. METHODS: We report on the development and piloting of the decision coaching programme. It comprises a training course for multiple sclerosis nurses and the coaching intervention. The intervention consists of up to three structured nurse-led decision coaching sessions, access to an evidence-based online information platform (DECIMS-Wiki) and a final physician consultation. After feasibility testing, a pilot randomised controlled trial was performed. People with multiple sclerosis were randomised to the intervention or control group. The latter had also access to the DECIMS-Wiki, but received otherwise care as usual. Nurses were not blinded to group assignment, while people with multiple sclerosis and physicians were. The primary outcome was 'informed choice' after six months including the sub-dimensions' risk knowledge (after 14 days), attitude concerning immunotreatment (after physician consultation), and treatment uptake (after six months). Quantitative process evaluation data were collected via questionnaires. Qualitative interviews were performed with all nurses and a convenience sample of nine people with multiple sclerosis. RESULTS: 116 people with multiple sclerosis fulfilled the inclusion criteria and 73 (63%) were included. Groups were comparable at baseline. Data of 51 people with multiple sclerosis (70%) were available for the primary endpoint. In the intervention group 15 of 31 (48%) people with multiple sclerosis achieved an informed choice after six months and 6 of 20 (30%) in the control group. Process evaluation data illustrated a positive response towards the coaching programme as well as good acceptance. CONCLUSIONS: The pilot-phase showed promising results concerning acceptability and feasibility of the intervention, which was well perceived by people with multiple sclerosis, most nurses and physicians. Delegating parts of the immunotreatment decision-making process to trained nurses has the potential to increase informed choice and participation as well as effectiveness of patient-physician consultations.


Subject(s)
Clinical Decision-Making , Multiple Sclerosis/nursing , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Nursing Evaluation Research , Pilot Projects , Process Assessment, Health Care
9.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 18: 186-195, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29141808

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Risk knowledge is relevant to make informed decisions in multiple sclerosis (MS). The risk knowledge questionnaire for relapsing-remitting MS (RIKNO 1.0) was developed and piloted in Germany. OBJECTIVE: To produce a revised RIKNO 2.0 questionnaire using mixed methodology in a European setting. METHODS: The questionnaire was translated in seven languages. MS patient and health professional (HP) expert feedback was obtained from Germany, Italy, Estonia, Serbia, and the UK. A German web-based survey of RIKNO 2.0 compared the tool with the MS Knowledge Questionnaire (MSKQ), each one used with two versions (with/without a "don't know" DN option). RESULTS: While RIKNO 2.0 was considered difficult, it was rated as highly educational. One item was reframed, and two new items were added. The web-based German survey (n = 708 completers) showed that the DN version did not increase participation rate and did not produce significantly higher scores. Internal consistency (Cronbach alpha) without SN response was 0.73. RIKNO 2.0 scores showed normality distribution irrespective of the answering format. Item difficulty was high ranging from 0.07 to 0.79. Less than 50% of questions were answered correctly (mean 8.9) compared to 80.4% in the MSKQ (mean 20.1). Higher numeracy competency and education were significantly, albeit weakly, associated to higher scores for both RIKNO 2.0 and MSKQ. CONCLUSION: Including "don't know" options in knowledge questionnaires does not increase percentage of correct replies. RIKNO 2.0 is a complex questionnaire to be used in an educational context and studies on patient information. The tool is now available in seven languages.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/diagnosis , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Aged , Attitude of Health Personnel , Educational Status , Europe , Female , Focus Groups , Health Personnel , Humans , Internet , Male , Mathematical Concepts , Middle Aged , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/therapy , Patient Education as Topic , Pilot Projects , Regression Analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Risk , Translating
10.
Clin Rehabil ; 31(2): 250-261, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27072153

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of a multi-component evidence-based education programme on disease modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis. DESIGN: Controlled trial with two consecutive patient cohorts and a gap of two months between cohorts. SETTING: Three neurological rehabilitation centres. SUBJECTS: Patients with multiple sclerosis within rehabilitation. INTERVENTIONS: Control group (CG) participants were recruited and received standard information. Two months later, intervention group (IG) participants were recruited and received a six-hour nurse-led interactive group education programme consisting of two parts and a comprehensive information brochure. MAIN MEASURES: Primary endpoint was "informed choice", comprising of adequate risk knowledge in combination with congruency between attitude towards immunotherapy and actual immunotherapy uptake. Further outcomes comprised risk knowledge, decision autonomy, anxiety and depression, self-efficacy, and fatigue. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were included (IG=75, CG=81). The intervention led to significantly more participants with informed choice (IG: 47% vs. CG: 23%, P=0.004). The rate of persons with adequate risk knowledge was significantly higher in the IG two weeks after the intervention (IG: 54% vs. CG: 31%, P=0.007), but not after six months (IG: 48% vs. CG: 31%, P=0.058). No significant differences were shown for positive attitude towards disease modifying therapy (IG: 62% vs. CG: 71%, P=0.29) and for disease modifying therapy status after six months (IG: 61.5% vs CG: 68.6%, P=0.39). Also no differences were found for autonomy preferences and decisional conflict after six months. CONCLUSION: Delivering evidence-based information on multiple sclerosis disease modifying therapies within a rehabilitation setting led to a marked increase of informed choices.


Subject(s)
Decision Making , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Immunotherapy/methods , Multiple Sclerosis/therapy , Patient Education as Topic/organization & administration , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Sclerosis/diagnosis , Multiple Sclerosis/immunology , Observer Variation , Prognosis , Program Development , Program Evaluation , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Single-Blind Method , Treatment Outcome
11.
PLoS One ; 10(10): e0138364, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26430887

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adequate risk knowledge of patients is a prerequisite for shared decision making but few attempts have been made to develop assessment tools. Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of young adults with an increasing number of partially effective immunotherapies and therefore a paradigmatic disease to study patient involvement. OBJECTIVE/METHODS: Based on an item bank of MS risk knowledge items and patient feedback including perceived relevance we developed a risk knowledge questionnaire for relapsing remitting (RR) MS (RIKNO 1.0) which was a primary outcome measure in a patient education trial (192 early RRMS patients). RESULTS: Fourteen of the RIKNO 1.0 multiple-choice items were selected based on patient perceived relevance and item difficulty indices, and five on expert opinion. Mean item difficulty was 0.58, ranging from 0.14 to 0.79. Mean RIKNO 1.0 score increased after the educational intervention from 10.6 to 12.4 (p = 0.0003). Selected items were particularly difficult (e.g. those on absolute risk reductions of having a second relapse) and were answered correctly in only 30% of the patients, even after the intervention. CONCLUSION: Despite its high difficulty, RIKNO 1.0 is a responsive instrument to assess risk knowledge in RRMS patients participating in educational interventions.


Subject(s)
Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/therapy , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Education as Topic , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Risk , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
12.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 50(2): 201-6, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21354004

ABSTRACT

Several studies have tested the strength and various fixation modalities of the long dorsal arm offset V osteotomy, and have proven it to be a stable construct when fixated properly. We believe that a modification of the traditional Austin cuts, with a slightly longer plantar arm, lends itself to greater stability because instead of ground reactive forces applying a distraction moment on the osteotomy, the ground actually compresses the osteotomy leading to greater stability and less chance of failure. We compared the mechanical stability of the long dorsal offset V osteotomy to the slightly longer plantar arm osteotomy using 20 sawbone models, 10 in each study group. The offset V osteotomies were all fixated with two 2.7-mm stainless steel screws through the dorsal arm of the osteotomy, and the longer plantar arm osteotomies were fixated with one 2.4-mm stainless steel screw through the plantar arm of the osteotomy. Results of testing with the 858 Mini Bionix materials testing device, showed a mean load at failure of the long dorsal arm osteotomies of 142.26 N (range 53.16-235.45 N). Mean load at failure of the longer plantar arm osteotomies was 280.07 N (range 184.91-337.39 N). There was a significant difference in the ultimate load at failure between the 2 groups (P < .0001). There was no significant difference in displacement (P = .18) or stiffness (P = .54). The results of our study indicate that the slightly longer plantar arm osteotomy is a more stable construct than the long dorsal arm offset V osteotomy.


Subject(s)
Metatarsal Bones/surgery , Osteotomy/methods , Bone Screws , Humans , Models, Anatomic , Stress, Mechanical , Weight-Bearing
13.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 50(3): 287-92, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21435913

ABSTRACT

Conventional thinking holds that high intermetatarsal and hallux abductus angles (>15° and >25°, respectively) are associated with a hypermobile first ray and require a Lapidus procedure to achieve satisfactory correction for the treatment of hallux valgus. However, normal first ray motion may be misinterpreted as hypermobility, and it is possible to take advantage of this motion to correct some portion of a large hallux abductovalgus deformity with distal procedures, such as the Austin or first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion. We retrospectively examined radiographs of 61 patients with first intermetatarsal and hallux abductus angles greater than 15° and greater than 25°, respectively, who had undergone hallux abductovalgus correction via Lapidus, Austin, or first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic measurements of the intermetatarsal and hallux abductus angles were made. The results revealed no statistically significant differences in the amount of correction achieved by any of the 3 procedures in comparison with the others. We concluded that, given appropriate patient selection, an Austin or first MTPJ fusion could reliably correct large intermetatarsal and hallux abductus angles that, in the hands of many surgeons, are often treated by means of Lapidus arthrodesis.


Subject(s)
Foot Joints/surgery , Hallux Valgus/surgery , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Foot Joints/pathology , Hallux Valgus/diagnostic imaging , Hallux Valgus/pathology , Humans , Orthopedic Procedures/instrumentation , Postoperative Period , Preoperative Care , Radiography , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Statistics as Topic
14.
Z Gerontol Geriatr ; 41(6): 440-6, 2008 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19190866

ABSTRACT

All states of confusion with acute onset and alteration of thinking, perception and awareness are defined as "delirium". Delirium is a common problem in older patients admitted to the hospital. It is combined with a negative prognosis and complications (falls, infections, etc.). Diagnosis and management need special efforts. Delirium is mostly associated with an underlying disease. In the elderly patient, nearly every disease can be accompanied by delirium, and the fragile older patient is especially affected.Delirium should be evaluated using a systematic approach according to frequency and impact of possible causes. An accurate diagnosis can be challenging. Symptoms have to be distinguished from other cerebral alterations, such as preexisting dementia or depression. Due to the high prevalence, one should always be aware to the presence of delirium.With the treatment of the identified disease, there is generally a reduction of delirium. Often medical intervention in the acute state is necessary to prevent further alteration of the patient. Beside an adequate medical strategy, it is important to create a safe environment for the affected patient. The article gives suggestions for a systematic diagnostic and therapeutic strategy of delirium.


Subject(s)
Delirium/therapy , Frail Elderly , Hospitalization , Aged , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Confusion/diagnosis , Confusion/etiology , Confusion/therapy , Delirium/diagnosis , Delirium/etiology , Haloperidol/therapeutic use , Humans , Prescription Drugs/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Risperidone/therapeutic use , Social Environment , Treatment Outcome
15.
Zentralbl Gynakol ; 125(1): 23-9, 2003 Jan.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12836123

ABSTRACT

In patients with breast-conserving surgery of carcinoma and radiotherapy pain rarely is an issue between patient and physician because the operation is considered to be well tolerable and radiotherapy to have few side- effects. There are very few data about frequency and management of pain in these patients. Therefore we evaluated a group of 180 patients after breast-conserving surgery during radiotherapy using a new Likert-scaled questionnaire. Data on the following items were collected: number of patients experiencing pain, pain attribution, frequency and intensity of pain, subjective evaluation and restriction in daily routine. Furthermore, we evaluated the side effects of radiation in an RTOG scale. 85% of patients had pain during radiation which by most was attributed to cancer treatment (surgery and radiation). More than 50% reported light to moderate pain during the entire six-week treatment. Thus pain is a more common symptom in breast cancer patients during radiation therapy than normally assumed and therefore should receive more attention by gynecologists and radiotherapists.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Mastectomy, Segmental/adverse effects , Pain, Postoperative/physiopathology , Pain/physiopathology , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Combined Modality Therapy , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Pain/etiology , Pain Measurement , Retrospective Studies
16.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 51(5): 1328-35, 2001 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11728694

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To confirm our assumptions regarding factors that apparently cause psychological distress related to adjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer patients and to evaluate variables that can predict therapy-associated distress. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 1997 and April 1998, 111 women (33-84 years) with early-stage breast cancer were irradiated (56 Gy) after breast-conserving surgery. Patients were given self-assessment questionnaires on the first and last day of radiotherapy. Statistical analysis was performed using the structural equation model LISREL, variance analysis, and regression analysis. RESULTS: The internal subject-related factors (coping, radiation-related anxiety, physical distress, psychological distress) reciprocally influenced each other, whereas external radiotherapy-specific factors (environmental influence, confidence in the medical staff) were causally related to coping, anxiety, and distress. Fifty-three percent of the women felt distressed because cancer affected the breast; 48% were initially afraid of radiotherapy. For 36%, anxiety was not reduced during treatment. Highly distressed women were identified by the following parameters: < or =58 years; initial anxiety; they were affected by having breast cancer, were negatively affected by environmental factors, and did not find distraction helpful. CONCLUSION: Despite considerable individual variability in breast cancer patients, it seems possible to identify women who run a high risk of therapy-associated distress. In these patients, psychosocial support is necessary to reduce treatment-related anxiety and to stabilize confidence in the medical staff.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy/psychology , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged
17.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 177(4): 189-94, 2001 Apr.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11370553

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In case of recurrent carcinoma of the head and neck region therapeutic options are often limited due to intensive prior therapy and/or reduced physical condition of the patient. Nevertheless there is a need for palliative treatment to control symptoms like pain, obstruction of the airways, dysphagia and for hygienic and cosmetic reasons. Side effects, treatment time and achievable results have to be adjusted to the needs of this patient subgroup. PATIENTS AND METHOD: 14 patients (13 male, one female) with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region were studied. Average age was 56.1 years (range 42-76 years) (Table 1). Prior therapy: radiotherapy n = 14 (42-71.3 Gy), surgery: n = 10, chemotherapy: n = 13 (Table 2). Our patients received 100-150 mg/m2 Bendamustin i.v. (day 1 and 2) and involved field irradiation 15 Gy (daily dose 3 Gy, day 1-5) (Figure 1). Remission status, time to progression, side effects and survival were documented. RESULTS: Ten patients showed partial remissions, four patients had complete remissions of the treated lesion (Figure 2), amelioration of 70% of tumor symptoms was documented (Figure 3). Time to progression was 2-104 weeks. Side effects: 71% of patients had no significant side effects, CTC Grade 3 to 4 toxicity was seen in two patients (14%). CONCLUSION: The reported therapy regimen allows successful palliative treatment of intensively pretreated patients with progressive recurrent tumors of the head and neck. Side effects are tolerable even in patients with reduced physical condition.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Nitrogen Mustard Compounds/therapeutic use , Palliative Care/methods , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Bendamustine Hydrochloride , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nitrogen Mustard Compounds/adverse effects , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
18.
Anticancer Res ; 20(1A): 401-5, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10769687

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine (dFdC) is a new nucleoside analogue with promising activity in different solid tumors. We investigated whether dFdC enhances the effect of irradiation in human squamous carcinoma cells of the oropharynx (#4197) and of the uterine cervix (HeLa) with special regard to the time-dose-relationship concerning dFdC and the dependence upon the timing of irradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Under standardized conditions monolayers of cells were exposed to various dFdC concentrations (0.003-10 mumol/l) for different times (4-24 h). Irradiation (0-6 Gy) followed immediately or 12 h after dFdC exposure (0.003-0.03 mumol/l; 4-24 h). RESULTS: The cytotoxic effect of dFdC depends on its concentration and the exposure duration. Exposed to non and/or slightly cytotoxic concentrations (> or = 0.003-0.03 mumol/l) for 4, 8, 16 and 24 h and followed by immediate irradiation the radiation enhancement ratio (RER) is 1.03-1.67 in #4197 cells and 1.04-2.47 in HeLa cells, respectively. Irradiated 12 h after 24 h exposure (dFdC 0.01-0.03 mumol/l) the RER is reduced to 1.10-1.17 (#4197) and 1.18-1.72 (HeLa). CONCLUSIONS: Depending on the drug concentration, exposure duration, and timing of irradiation, dFdC enhances the irradiation effect on human squamous cell carcinoma cell lines (#4197, HeLa).


Subject(s)
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/pharmacology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Radiation-Sensitizing Agents/pharmacology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Deoxycytidine/pharmacology , Female , HeLa Cells/drug effects , HeLa Cells/radiation effects , Humans , Tumor Cells, Cultured/drug effects , Tumor Cells, Cultured/radiation effects , Tumor Stem Cell Assay , Gemcitabine
19.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 176(11): 506-12, 2000 Nov.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11143524

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy is the treatment of choice in multiple myeloma; but there are no curative options. Therefore, the treatment rationale is characterized by reduction of symptoms and inhibition of complications. Regarding reduction of pain, treatment of (impending) fractures, and spinal cord compression radiation is an important part of palliative treatment. In our retrospective study we report the effect of radiotherapy on reduction of pain, recalcification and the reduction of neurological symptoms and evaluate factors which have an impact on therapeutic outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1, Jan 1988 to 31, Dec 1998, 42 patients (19 women, 23 men; range of ages 46 to 85 years, median age 64.9 years) with 71 target volumes were irradiated (median dose 36 Gy, 2 to 3 Gy 5 times/week) because of symptomatic disease (67/71: osseous pain, 45/71: fractures/impending fractures, 13/71: spinal cord compression) (Tables 1 and 2). The median time from diagnosis to the first course of radiotherapy was 11.9 months (0.3 to 90 months). At the time of first irradiation, 5 and 37 patients were in tumor Stage II and III (Salmon/Durie), respectively. The median value of the Karnofsky performance was 70% (40 to 90%). RESULTS: During follow-up (at least 6 months) in 85% of target volumes complete and partial pain relief (measured by patients' perception and the use of analgetic medication) was achieved; recurrences were seen in 8.8%. In 26/56 (46.4%) lesions evaluable a recalcification was seen whereas 17.9% showed progressive disease (comparison of radiographs before and after radiation). In 22.3% of all lesions initially with impending fracture (4/18) radiotherapy failed because of fracture after treatment (Tables 3 and 4). Simultaneous chemotherapy and a Karnofsky performance > or = 70 had a significant impact on a positive response to treatment, respectively. Spinal cord compression symptoms were reduced in 7/13 (53.8%) of patients (scaled due to the classification by Findlay 1987). The median survival from diagnosis for the entire group was 34.9 months (7.5 to 119.3 months), after irradiation 13.1 months (0.2 to 105.3 months) (Figure 1). CONCLUSION: When adequately indicated radiotherapy has shown to be an effective palliative treatment. Taking under consideration that the results are retrospective we suppose that in multiple myeloma the local response to radiation is supported by a favorable performance status and simultaneous chemotherapy. Irradiation treatment does not change prognosis regarding overall survival.


Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma/physiopathology , Multiple Myeloma/radiotherapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Fractures, Bone/etiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Pain , Palliative Care , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Cord Compression/radiotherapy , Survival Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...