Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
Add more filters











Publication year range
1.
Fundam Appl Toxicol ; 19(1): 141-6, 1992 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1397795

ABSTRACT

The chemical constituents of cigarette smoke are greatly diluted in environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). In the typical indoor environment where cigarettes are smoked, the mean value of respirable suspended particles is approximately 0.1 mg/m3. In this study, we used aged and diluted sidestream smoke (ADSS) of 1R4F University of Kentucky research cigarettes as a surrogate for ETS and exposed Sprague-Dawley rats nose-only to 0, 0.1, 1.0, and 10 mg wet total particulate matter (WTPM)/m3 for 6 hr per day for 14 consecutive days. DNA from lung, heart, larynx, and liver was tested for adduct formation after 7 and 14 days of exposure and after 14 days of recovery. In addition, alveolar macrophages from animals exposed for 7 days were examined for chromosomal aberrations. Exposure-related DNA adducts were not observed in any of the animals at 0.1 or 1.0 mg WTPM/m3, which represent ambient and 10-fold exaggerated ETS concentrations, respectively. Slight diagonal radioactive zones, characteristic of adducts observed in human smokers and in animals exposed to mainstream smoke, were observed, but only in lung and heart DNA of animals exposed to the highest concentration of ADSS (10 mg WTPM/m3), a 100-fold exaggeration of typical field measurements of ETS. The mean relative adduct labeling values (+/- SE) were 8.7 (+/- 0.2) adducts per 10(9) nucleotides for lung DNA and 5.7 (+/- 0.7) adducts per 10(9) nucleotides for heart DNA after 14 days of exposure. No elevation in chromosomal aberrations was observed in alveolar macrophages.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Chromosome Aberrations , DNA/drug effects , Macrophages, Alveolar/drug effects , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/adverse effects , Administration, Inhalation , Animals , Body Weight/drug effects , DNA/analysis , DNA/metabolism , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Heart/drug effects , Lung/chemistry , Lung/drug effects , Macrophages, Alveolar/physiology , Male , Myocardium/chemistry , Phosphorus Radioisotopes , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Time Factors
2.
Mutat Res ; 260(1): 9-18, 1991 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2027346

ABSTRACT

Cigarette smokers have been reported to void urine which is more mutagenic than that voided by non-smokers, but the specific urinary mutagen(s) have not been identified. Since mechanistic studies are best performed in animal models, the objective of this study was to determine if a model to study the role of cigarette smoke and its components in urinary mutagenicity could be developed in rats. XAD-2 resin was used to concentrate the urine and the microsuspension modification of the Ames test used to quantify mutagenicity. Nicotine administered by intraperitoneal injection at 0.8 mg/kg (the maximum tolerated dose) or inhalation of carbon monoxide for 14 days at the maximum tolerated dose (1800 ppm, resulting in 68% carboxyhemoglobin) did not increase urinary mutagenicity. Cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) prepared by electrostatic precipitation of mainstream smoke increased urinary mutagenicity at doses of 100 and 200 mg/kg when administered acutely by either i.p. injection or gavage, verifying that the assay system was capable of detecting cigarette smoke-related mutagens in the urine. However, cigarette smoke administered by the appropriate route of exposure, nose-only inhalation, for 1, 7, 14 or 90 days (1 h per day) did not increase urinary mutagenicity. The smoke concentration administered was at or near the maximum tolerated dose as evidenced by carboxyhemoglobin concentrations of approximately 50%, and of 10% or more weight loss in exposed animals. Thus, although cigarette smoke condensate is mutagenic in vitro and mutagenic urine was observed when rats were given high doses of CSC by inappropriate routes of administration, acute or subchronic inhalation exposure to the maximum tolerated dose of whole cigarette smoke did not increase urinary mutagenicity in rats. These results indicate that the rat may be an inappropriate model to study urinary mutagenicity following the inhalation of tobacco smoke.


Subject(s)
Carbon Monoxide/toxicity , DNA/drug effects , Nicotine/toxicity , Smoke/adverse effects , Urine , Administration, Inhalation , Animals , Disease Models, Animal , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Injections, Intraperitoneal , Male , Mutagenicity Tests , Plants, Toxic , Rats , Rats, Inbred Strains , Nicotiana
3.
Fundam Appl Toxicol ; 16(3): 435-48, 1991 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1855617

ABSTRACT

Mechanistically based short-term in vitro tests to evaluate the relative cytotoxicity of of chemicals will complement in vitro genotoxicity testing during the initial phases of toxicity evaluation as well as provide information on the cellular site of action for chemicals found to be toxic in animals. The objective of this study was to characterize a procedure for evaluating mitochondrial membrane potential, an integral component of cellular energy homeostasis and normal cellular function, as an in vitro indicator of chemically induced cytotoxicity. Rhodamine 123, a cationic fluorescent dye whose mitochondrial fluorescence intensity decreases quantitatively in response to dissipation of mitochondrial transmembrane potential, was used to evaluate disturbances in mitochondrial membrane potential. Cultured rat liver epithelial cells (WB cell line) or human skin fibroblasts (MSU-2 cell line) treated with the oxidative phosphorylation uncoupler 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP) or the cytochrome oxidase inhibitor sodium azide were used to characterize the system. In addition, acetaldehyde, which has been reported to damage the plasma membrane, but not the mitochondrial membrane, was used to demonstrate the specificity of this assay system. Mitochondrial membrane potential was not significantly affected by the cell culture density, as long as the cells were in the logarithmic phase of growth. The stage of the cell cycle influenced the mitochondrial membrane potential in human skin fibroblasts (highest in late G1-early S) but not in rat liver cells. DNP and sodium azide significantly (p less than 0.01) reduced the mitochondrial membrane potential in both cell lines compared to untreated cells, while acetaldehyde did not reduce the mitochondrial membrane potential in either cell line. This assay provides a tool for evaluating the effect of chemical treatments on mitochondrial membrane potential, as well as an indicator of cytotoxicity which does not require the use of animals.


Subject(s)
Mitochondria/drug effects , Toxicology/methods , Animals , Cell Cycle/drug effects , Cells, Cultured , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Fluorescence , Membrane Potentials/drug effects , Mitochondria/physiology , Rats , Rhodamine 123 , Rhodamines/toxicity , Thymidine/metabolism
4.
Environ Mol Mutagen ; 17(4): 244-52, 1991.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2050132

ABSTRACT

Cigarette smokers have been reported to void urine that is more mutagenic, as measured in the Salmonella/microsome assay, than urine voided by nonsmokers. Several previous studies have attempted to correlate indices of tobacco smoke exposure (e.g. nicotine, cotinine, tar intake) with urinary mutagenicity, with conflicting results. These studies generally involved small numbers of smokers and did not carefully control diet, which is known to affect urinary mutagenicity markedly. Our objective was to conduct a controlled study to determine clearly if there were a correlation between urinary nicotine, cotinine, or nicotine + cotinine and urinary mutagenicity and to determine if nicotine or its major metabolite plays a role in the mutagenicity of urine from cigarette smokers. We used a large number of smokers (31), each of whom smoked both a tobacco-burning cigarette and a tobacco-heating cigarette on consecutive weeks, and we prepared and served identical diets to all subjects. Nicotine and cotinine concentrations were determined in small aliquots from urine samples collected over 24 hr, and the remaining urine sample was extracted and concentrated on XAD-2 resin for mutagenicity assays in the Salmonella/microsome test. Nicotine, cotinine, and nicotine + cotinine were statistically correlated with mutagenicity of urine from smokers of the tobacco-burning cigarette, but there was no correlation between nicotine, cotinine, or nicotine + cotinine and mutagenicity of urine from smokers of the tobacco-heating cigarettes. Thus, although urinary nicotine and cotinine concentrations correlate with urinary mutagenicity in smokers of tobacco-burning cigarettes, the present results indicate that nicotine and its metabolite are not responsible for the mutagenicity of smokers' urine.


Subject(s)
Cotinine/urine , Diet , Mutagens/urine , Nicotine/urine , Smoking/adverse effects , Cotinine/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Mutagenicity Tests , Nicotine/adverse effects
5.
Food Chem Toxicol ; 28(9): 639-46, 1990 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2272562

ABSTRACT

Measuring the mutagenicity of urine is widely viewed as a means of evaluating human exposure to potentially genotoxic materials. Diet and cigarette smoking have both been reported to affect the mutagenicity of human urine, but the relationship between smoking status and the expression of diet-related urinary mutagenicity is unknown. It has been reported that some promutagens are more active in in vitro assays when tested in the presence of urine from smokers than when tested in the presence of urine from non-smokers. We aimed to determine whether the differences in urinary mutagenicity between smokers and non-smokers result from increased urinary mutagenicity from dietary heterocyclic amine mutagens in smokers compared with non-smokers. Groups of smokers and non-smokers (6-12) were given identical diets, previously shown to be low in heterocyclic amines and very low in mutagenicity. The diet consisted exclusively of raw food and of food cooked in boiling water. After a 2-day dietary stabilization period, 24-hour urine samples were collected for three consecutive days. The regimen was repeated in the following week. For comparison, both groups were also placed on a "western" diet, consisting of a variety of foods prepared by several cooking methods, designed to reflect what a typical United States family might consume. Urine was concentrated using XAD-2 resin and then assayed for mutagenic activity in the Ames test. The urine of smokers was significantly more mutagenic than that of non-smokers when on both the raw/boiled and the "western" diets. These results indicate that the increased urinary mutagenicity observed in smokers compared with non-smokers is not due to enhanced mutagenicity of diet-related heterocyclic amine mutagens in the urine of smokers.


Subject(s)
Diet , Smoking/urine , Adult , Cotinine/urine , Creatinine/urine , Female , Humans , Male , Mutagenicity Tests , Nicotine/urine
6.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 30(8): 755-63, 1990 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2401755

ABSTRACT

Cigarettes can be developed that heat rather than burn tobacco. Such products would be expected to have less "tar" and other combustion products than cigarettes that burn tobacco. With one product of this type, benzo(a)pyrene, N-nitrosamines, phenolic compounds, acetaldehyde, acrolein, hydrogen cyanide, and N-heterocyclic compounds have been reduced 10- to 100-fold compared to the Kentucky reference (1R4F) cigarette, a representative low-tar cigarette. The yields of nicotine and carbon monoxide from this new cigarette are less than the yields of 95% and 75%, respectively, of the cigarettes sold in the United States during 1988. Nicotine absorption from smoking this new cigarette is not significantly different from that of tobacco-burning cigarettes yielding equivalent levels of nicotine. The urine mutagenicity of smokers of new cigarettes is significantly less (P less than .05) than that of smokers of tobacco-burning cigarettes and is not significantly different (P greater than .10) from that of nonsmokers. We conclude that cigarettes which heat rather than burn tobacco can reduce the yield of tobacco combustion products. This simplification of smoke chemistry had no effect on nicotine absorption in smokers and resulted in a reduction of biological activity in smokers as measured by urine mutagenicity.


Subject(s)
Hot Temperature , Nicotine/analysis , Smoke/analysis , Smoking , Adult , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mutagenicity Tests , Nicotine/blood , Nicotine/pharmacokinetics , Plants, Toxic , Smoke/adverse effects , Nicotiana
7.
Food Chem Toxicol ; 27(10): 657-66, 1989 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2606402

ABSTRACT

The effects of cooking methods on the in vitro mutagenicity of individual foods, the in vitro mutagenicity of meals containing those foods, and the mutagenic exposure of human volunteers following consumption of the meals were examined using Ames bacterial strain TA98 with S-9 metabolic activation. Three methods of food preparation--boiling, baking and frying/flame-broiling--were compared. With meats, frying or broiling resulted in higher in vitro mutagenicity (10- to 50-fold) than did baking or boiling, whereas for carbohydrates, eggs or vegetables mutagenicity did not vary markedly with cooking method. The observed (experimental) mutagenic activity of the meals was quite similar to their calculated (predicted) mutagenicity, obtained by summing the mutagenicity of the individual foods in the meal. The close agreement between experimental and predicted mutagenicity indicated that components of the meal did not interact in either a synergistic or inhibitory manner. The mutagenicity of fried flame-broiled meals was approximately 10-fold greater than the mutagenicity of baked or broiled meals, which were similar in mutagenicity. The mutagenicity of human urine following consumption of the meals was related to the in vitro mutagenicity of the meals themselves. The in vitro mutagenicity of meals is markedly affected by the cooking method used to prepare them and the mutagenicity of the diet may be reflected in the mutagenicity of body fluids.


Subject(s)
Diet , Food Analysis , Hot Temperature , Urine/analysis , Adult , Amines/adverse effects , Amines/analysis , Amines/chemical synthesis , Carcinogenicity Tests , Cooking/methods , Female , Histidine/analysis , Humans , Male , Mutagenicity Tests
8.
Mutat Res ; 223(2): 221-32, 1989 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2739680

ABSTRACT

Cigarette smokers have been reported to void urine which is more mutagenic, as measured in the Ames bacterial mutation assay, than urine voided by non-smokers. Condensate from the mainstream smoke of a cigarette which heats, but does not burn tobacco (test cigarette) showed no evidence of mutagenicity in a battery of in vitro genotoxicity assays under conditions in which condensate from the mainstream smoke of cigarettes that burn tobacco was mutagenic. The objective of this study was to determine whether the absence of mutagenic activity observed in the in vitro assays would be reflected in the urine of smokers of the test cigarette. 72 subjects (31 smokers and 41 non-smokers) were enrolled in a 6-week study, with the smokers randomly divided into 2 groups. The study was designed as a double crossover, with each smoker smoking both test (tobacco-heating) and reference (tobacco-burning) cigarettes. This design allowed each smoker to serve as his or her own control while at the same time allowing comparisons between groups of non-smokers and smokers of both test and reference cigarettes. 24-h urine samples were collected twice a week and concentrated using XAD-2 resin. Urine concentrates were tested in Ames bacterial strains TA98 and TA100, with and without metabolic activation and with and without beta-glucuronidase/aryl sulfatase. Individuals who smoked the test cigarette voided urine which was significantly less mutagenic than that voided when they smoked reference cigarettes. The mutagenicity of urine from smokers who smoked the test cigarette and non-smokers did not differ under any of the assay conditions used in this study.


Subject(s)
Mutagenicity Tests , Nicotiana , Plants, Toxic , Smoking/urine , Animals , Biotransformation , Cotinine/urine , Creatinine/urine , Diet , Female , Histidine/urine , Humans , Male , Microsomes, Liver/metabolism , Nicotine/urine , Rats , Rats, Inbred Strains , Smoking/adverse effects
9.
Mutat Res ; 206(2): 141-8, 1988 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3050496

ABSTRACT

The measurement of urinary mutagenicity is a non-invasive monitoring tool which often reflects an animal's recent exposure to genotoxic agents. Although studies in man are indispensable for monitoring industrial and/or environmental exposure to genotoxins, a sensitive laboratory animal model is necessary for mechanistic studies on the role of specific chemical exposure in altering urinary mutagenicity. The objective of this study was to enhance the sensitivity of the methodology used for detecting urinary mutagenicity in rats by using XAD-2 resin to extract and concentrate the urine and a microsuspension-modified Ames test to quantify mutagenicity. The polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon benzo[a]pyrene (BP) and the aromatic amine 2-acetylaminofluorene (AAF) were used as test compounds. Under the conditions of our study, AAF administered to rats by gavage at doses of 1 mg/kg or higher induced a dose-dependent increase in urine mutagenicity. The greatest mutagenic response was seen when S9 was present during the microsuspension-modified Ames test and beta-glucuronidase (BG) was not included. Similarly, BP administered to rats by gavage at doses of 10 mg/kg or higher induced a dose-dependent increase in urinary mutagenicity. The relative importance of BG and S9 were quite different with BP than with AAF. With BP, mutagenicity was greatest when both S9 and BG were present during the microsuspension-modified Ames test, and least with S9 and without BG. In both AAF- and BP-treated animals, extraction of the urine on XAD-2 resin markedly enhanced the mutagenic response compared to neat urine, but partitioning of the XAD-2 eluate into methylene chloride always diminished the mutagenicity of the urine extract. The results demonstrate the sensitivity and reproducibility of rodent urinary mutagenicity assays when XAD-2 resin is used to extract and concentrate the urine and a microsuspension-modified Ames test is used to quantify mutagenicity. This sensitive method should facilitate mechanistic studies on the roles of specific environmental agents in affecting urinary mutagenicity and, in addition, may be used during acute, subchronic and chronic rodent bioassays as a non-invasive in vivo indicator of genotoxic exposure.


Subject(s)
Mutagens/isolation & purification , Urine/analysis , 2-Acetylaminofluorene/pharmacology , 2-Acetylaminofluorene/urine , Animals , Benzo(a)pyrene/pharmacology , Benzo(a)pyrene/urine , Chromatography, Ion Exchange , Male , Microsomes, Liver/metabolism , Mutagenicity Tests/methods , Mutagens/pharmacology , Rats , Salmonella typhimurium/drug effects
10.
Biochim Biophys Acta ; 888(1): 1-9, 1986 Aug 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3017439

ABSTRACT

Because the intestine is the first pass organ for orally administered drugs and because some of these drugs are known to undergo oxidative metabolism leading to the formation of free radicals, we investigated the potential for this to occur in cell suspensions of rat enterocytes. As part of our study, the effect of intracellularly produced superoxide on cellular metabolism was investigated. The drugs chosen were the quinone, menadione and the aromatic nitro-containing compound, nitrazepam. On incubation of both drugs with isolated enterocytes and the spin trap, 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO), rapid appearance of an electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectrum was recorded which was characteristic of hydroxyl radicals being spin trapped by DMPO giving 2,2-dimethyl-5-hydroxy-1-pyrrolidenyloxyl (DMPO-OH). Experiments were conducted which determined that the EPR spectrum of DMPO-OH resulted from the initial spin trapping of superoxide by DMPO to yield the corresponding nitroxide, 2,2-dimethyl-5-hydroxyl-1-pyrrolidenyloxyl (DMPO-OOH). Bioreduction of DMPO-OOH by glutathione peroxidase led to the rapid formation of DMPO-OH. We believe this enzymic pathway accounted for the EPR spectrum noted in incubations with either drug in the presence of the spin trap, DMPO. The incubation of enterocytes with both drugs did not mediate release of 51Cr nor lactate dehydrogenase. However, production of 14CO2 from [14C]glucose was severely inhibited (4-5-fold) in the presence of both drugs, while the incorporation of [14C]leucine into trichloroacetic acid precipitable protein was antagonized by menadione only. We conclude that superoxide can be demonstrated to arise as the result of enterocyte metabolism of menadione or nitrazepam. The consequence of oxidative metabolism of these drugs results in cellular dysfunction.


Subject(s)
Intestinal Mucosa/metabolism , Superoxides/metabolism , Animals , Biotransformation , Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System/metabolism , Cytochrome c Group/metabolism , Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy , Free Radicals/metabolism , In Vitro Techniques , Male , Nitrazepam/metabolism , Rats , Vitamin K/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL