Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Duodenal Neoplasms/surgery , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Pancreaticoduodenectomy , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Aged , Duodenal Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Intraoperative Period , Male , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
AIM: Very few studies have compared the epidemiological characteristics of patients with familial colorectal cancer Type X (FCCTX) with those of sporadic colorectal cancer (S-CRC). The aim of this study was to compare clinicopathological characteristics and survival between FCCTX and S-CRC in patients from a historically isolated geographical region. METHOD: A retrospective study was carried out of patients with S-CRC and FCCTX treated in the Canary Islands. Family and personal history of colorectal cancer (CRC) were recorded, together with genetic (microsatellite instability), immunohistochemical and clinical variables. RESULTS: Forty-eight (10.6%) of 451 patients were classified as FCCTX and the remaining 403 (89.4%) as S-CRC. Age at the diagnosis of tumour was significantly lower in FCCTX than in S-CRC (64.06 ± 12.65 years vs 69.13 ± 10.80 years; P = 0.01; Z = -2.48). Patients with FCCTX had a larger number of synchronous tumours (P = 0.09). Recurrence was significantly higher in FCCTX than in S-CRC (18.7% vs 8.6%; P = 0.01). Survival correlated significantly with the number of first-degree and second-degree relatives with CRC (P = 0.04; OR: 1.368, 95% CI: 1.01-1.84, and P = 0.04; OR: 1.363, 95% CI: 1.08-1.65) and with the total number of cases of CRC in the immediate family (P < 0.01; OR: 1.377, 95% CI: 1.17-1.61). Recurrence-free time was significantly lower in patients with FCCTX (log-rank = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Significant differences were found in several demographic and clinicopathological variables between patients with FCCTX and patients with S-CRC. These included increased tumour presentation under the age of 50 years and a higher recurrence rate in patients with FCCTX, suggesting an increased risk of CRC in this group.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Age Factors , Aged , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasms, Multiple Primary/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Multiple Primary/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Spain/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of adrenal metastases (AMs) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLMs) remains unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of AMs on long-term outcome and the role of adrenalectomy in patients with CLMs. METHODS: All patients resected for CLMs who developed AMs at a single institution between 1992 and 2006 were included in the study. Their long-term outcome was compared with that of all other patients resected for CLMs but without AMs. RESULTS: Hepatectomy was performed in 796 patients, of whom 14 (1.8 per cent) developed AMs, a median of 28 months after initial diagnosis of CLMs; the remaining 782 patients (98.2 per cent) had no AMs. All 14 patients had chemotherapy, and ten went on to adrenalectomy. Median survival after diagnosis of CLMs was 50 months in patients with AMs versus 68 months in those without (P = 0.020). After diagnosis of AMs, median survival was 23 months, whether or not adrenalectomy was performed. CONCLUSION: The development of AMs after liver resection for colorectal cancer deposits carries a poor prognosis, and adrenalectomy is probably not warranted.
