Patterns of Antiseizure Medication Use Following Meningioma Resection: A Single-Institution Experience.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate antiseizure medication (ASM) practice behavior for patients who present with seizures before meningioma resection and to review postoperative ASM management. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of 112 consecutive patients with meningiomas who underwent resection at a single institution between October 2016 and January 2020. Data were collected through detailed chart review. RESULTS: Of 112 patients, 35 (31%) had a preoperative seizure, and 43 (38%) were prescribed a preoperative ASM. At discharge, 96 patients (86%) were prescribed an ASM, most often 1000 mg daily of levetiracetam (64%, 61/96) and less often higher doses of levetiracetam or other ASMs. By the 6-month postoperative visit, 55 patients (49%) were taking at least 1 ASM, most commonly levetiracetam monotherapy (65%) at 500 mg twice daily (47%). This number further decreased to 45 (40%) patients by 1-year follow-up and 36 (32%) patients by last-known follow-up. By last follow-up (median 27.3 months; range 5.4-57.4 months), 24 patients (21%) had experienced a postoperative seizure, and 36 patients (32%) were never able to discontinue ASMs. Of patients remaining on levetiracetam monotherapy, only 36% remained on levetiracetam 500 mg twice daily. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately two thirds (68%) of patients who underwent surgical resection of meningioma were eventually able to completely discontinue their postoperative ASM regimen. However, nearly one third (32%) of patients required long-term ASM management. Levetiracetam monotherapy was the most common ASM prescribed during the postoperative period, and the proportion of patients requiring either higher doses of levetiracetam or alternative ASMs increased over time.

Long-term antiseizure medication use in patients after meningioma resection: identifying predictors for successful weaning and failures.

OBJECTIVE: To define risk factors for meningioma-related seizures and predictors of successful weaning of antiseizure medications following meningioma resection. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 95 patients who underwent meningioma resection at a single institution. Primary outcome analyzed was ability to achieve seizure freedom without the use of anti-seizure medication at 6-months, 1-year, and last known follow up. Secondary outcome was postoperative seizure freedom. RESULTS: Preoperative seizures (OR: 11.63, 95% CI [3.64, 37.17], p < 0.0001), non-skull base tumor location (OR: 3.01, 95% CI [1.29, 7.02], p = 0.0128), and modified STAMPE score of 3-5 (OR: 5.42, 95% CI [2.18, 13.52], p = 0.0003) were associated with greater likelihood of remaining on antiseizure medication at 6-month follow up. Preoperative seizures (OR: 4.93, 95% CI: [2.00, 12.16 ], p = 0.0008), intratumoral calcifications (OR: 4.19, 95% CI: [1.61, 14.46], p = 0.0055), modified STAMPE score of 3-5 (OR: 5.42, CI [2.18, 13.52], p = 0.0003), and Ki67 greater than 7% (OR: 5.68, CI [1.61, 20.10], p = 0.0060) were significant risk factors for inability to discontinue ASMs by last follow up. Preoperative seizures (OR: 4.33, 95% CI [1.59, 11.85], p = 0.0050) and modified STAMPE score of 3-5 (OR: 6.09, 95% CI [2.16, 17.20], p = 0.0007) were significant risk factors for postoperative seizures. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative seizures, modified STAMPE2 score of 3-5, non-skull base tumor location, intratumoral calcifications, and Ki67 > 7% were significant risk factors for inability to achieve seizure freedom without ASMs. In addition, the modified STAMPE2 score successfully predicted increased seizure risk following meningioma resection for patients with a score of 3 or higher.

Treatment of Refractory and Super-refractory Status Epilepticus.

Refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus (SE) are serious illnesses with a high risk of morbidity and even fatality. In the setting of refractory generalized convulsive SE (GCSE), there is ample justification to use continuous infusions of highly sedating medications-usually midazolam, pentobarbital, or propofol. Each of these medications has advantages and disadvantages, and the particulars of their use remain controversial. Continuous EEG monitoring is crucial in guiding the management of these critically ill patients: in diagnosis, in detecting relapse, and in adjusting medications. Forms of SE other than GCSE (and its continuation in a "subtle" or nonconvulsive form) should usually be treated far less aggressively, often with nonsedating anti-seizure drugs (ASDs). Management of "non-classic" NCSE in ICUs is very complicated and controversial, and some cases may require aggressive treatment. One of the largest problems in refractory SE (RSE) treatment is withdrawing coma-inducing drugs, as the prolonged ICU courses they prompt often lead to additional complications. In drug withdrawal after control of convulsive SE, nonsedating ASDs can assist; medical management is crucial; and some brief seizures may have to be tolerated. For the most refractory of cases, immunotherapy, ketamine, ketogenic diet, and focal surgery are among several newer or less standard treatments that can be considered. The morbidity and mortality of RSE is substantial, but many patients survive and even return to normal function, so RSE should be treated promptly and as aggressively as the individual patient and type of SE indicate.

Mortality in isodicentric chromosome 15 syndrome: The role of SUDEP.

PURPOSE: To ascertain the cause of mortality and incidence of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) in patients with supernumerary isodicentric chromosome 15 (idic15). METHODS: Cases were obtained from those reported to the Dup15q Alliance (www.dup15q.org) between April 2006 and June 2012; ~709 families were registered in their database. We performed a case-control study comparing reported SUDEP cases to living patients with epilepsy from the Dup15q Alliance registry who volunteered to be interviewed to examine clinical risk factors. KEY FINDINGS: There were nineteen deaths with idic15; 17 had epilepsy, and nine deaths were due to probable or definite SUDEP (4 females, median age of death was 13.5years, range: 3-26years). Possible SUDEP occurred in 2 others. The remainder died from status epilepticus (3), pneumonia (3), aspiration (1), and drowning (1). Nonambulatory status and lack of seizure control were more common among SUDEP cases than living dup15q patients. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings suggest that SUDEP is a common cause of death among children and young adults with isodicentric chromosome 15q11.2q13 duplications and patients with the most severe neurologic dysfunction may be at highest risk. Further studies are needed to examine if this specific genetic defect plays a role in the mechanism of SUDEP in these patients.