Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nurs Adm Q ; 35(2): 134-9, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21403487

ABSTRACT

New graduate nurses encounter emotional distress related to complex patient care situations and overwhelming workloads. Unequipped with coping mechanisms, new nurses verbalize difficulty feeling accepted in their assigned units. Self-perceptions of inadequacy and lack of independence contribute to anxiety. Consequently, hospitals are at risk for losing newly graduated nurses within the first year. The cost of losing new nurses is overwhelming to hospital institutions and further contributes to the looming nursing shortage. This article describes the use of a reflective practice exercise in a new registered nurse residency program in a magnet hospital to facilitate reflection and problem solving in the patient care unit. More research is needed to investigate the effectiveness of reflective practice in developing coping skills and retention rate in new graduate nurses.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Emotions , Nurses/psychology , Problem Solving , Stress, Psychological , Clinical Competence , Florida , Humans , Models, Educational , Models, Nursing , Nurses/standards , Personnel Turnover , Self Concept , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Workload
2.
Nurs Adm Q ; 35(2): 174-7, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21403491

ABSTRACT

Peer reviews in nursing are historically used to gauge performance within an individual's scope of practice or as a tool to evaluate a sentinel or adverse event. Quality of care measures, clinical pertinence, and evaluating standards of care have begun as parallel strategies to replace the former uses in assuring the right care at the right time in the right setting.


Subject(s)
Benchmarking/standards , Clinical Competence/standards , Nurses/standards , Nursing Staff, Hospital/standards , Peer Review, Health Care/methods , Quality of Health Care/standards , Florida , Humans , Peer Review, Health Care/standards
3.
Nurs Clin North Am ; 45(1): 49-64, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20189543

ABSTRACT

The many benefits to hospitals throughout the world that achieved Magnet designation is well documented. This status of recognition demands the support of leadership during the Magnet journey. In 2008, the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) announced a new model for the Magnet Recognition Program that translates the original 14 Forces of Magnetism into Five Model Components. Specifically, this new model includes sources of evidence and empiric outcomes that by definition accentuates transformational nursing leadership. The day-to-day impact of this change places an even greater emphasis on demonstrated outcomes and innovation that may potentially transform nursing practice, quality and safety of care, and the population served. This article provides tangible examples and outcomes for reaching nursing excellence through leadership support and engagement.


Subject(s)
Benchmarking/organization & administration , Credentialing/standards , Leadership , Models, Nursing , Nursing Care/standards , Nursing Service, Hospital/organization & administration , American Nurses' Association , Humans , Job Satisfaction , Models, Organizational , Program Development , Quality of Health Care/standards , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...