[Management of jaundice in the newborn≥35 GW: From screening to follow-up after discharge. Guidelines for clinical practice]. / Ictère à bilirubine non conjuguée du nouveau-né de 35 semaines et plus : du dépistage au suivi après sortie de la maternité. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique.

Jaundice due to unconjugated bilirubin is an everyday condition in the neonatal period because it results from the adaptation of bilirubin metabolism at this time of life. Hyperbilirubinemia has a potential neurotoxicity and although it most often resolves spontaneously, it can lead to acute and sometimes chronic encephalopathy. The latter condition is called kernicterus and induces severe and irreversible neurological sequelae. This rare complication is still reported in all countries throughout the world even if severe hyperbilirubinemia can be prevented and critical points points of failure in jaundice management are identified. Jaundice management are identified, jaundice is the most frequent symptom during the first days of life and after discharge from the maternity ward but also the major cause of readmission in the 15 first days of life. Therefore in the past 20 years, numerous countries have written national practical guidelines for the management of neonatal jaundice using various methodologies. Most of the time, the guidelines resulted from expert consensus more than from an evidence-based argument. The Société française de néonatologie created a working group to provide the first French clinical guidelines for the management of jaundice in the near-term newborn (35 weeks and more). They were written following a physiopathological argument and taking into account both clinical risk factors for severe hyperbilirubinemia and interindividual variability in vulnerability to bilirubin neurotoxicity. Practical tools were also developed to facilitate implementation of the guidelines and are also included.

[Congenital neuromuscular diseases with neonatal respiratory failure excluding myotonic dystrophy type 1 and infantile spinal muscular atrophy. Diagnosis strategy according to a 19-child series]. / Maladies neuromusculaires congénitales à expression respiratoire néonatale à l'exclusion de la dystrophie myotonique de type 1 et de l'amyotrophie spinale infantile. Stratégie d'exploration d'après une série de 19 enfants.

UNLABELLED: Apart from spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1), congenital neuromuscular diseases with early neonatal symptoms mean diagnostic and prognostic challenges mainly when infants require ventilatory support. OBJECTIVES: Consider a standardized strategy for infants suspected of congenital neuromuscular disease from analysis of the literature and retrospective experience with floppy and ventilatory support-dependent infants, after exclusion of well-known diseases (DM1, SMA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Floppy infants requiring ventilatory support in their 1st month of life, but showing no evidence of DM1, SMA, Prader-Willi syndrome, or encephalopathy. The retrospective multicenter study was based on the response of regional referent neuropediatricians in the Reference Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases of Greater Southwest France to an inquiry about prenatal and perinatal history, investigations, diagnosis, and outcome of the child and family. It was conducted between 2007 and 2012. RESULTS: Among the 19 newborns studied, all had severe hypotonia. Prenatal and perinatal features were similar. Their outcome was generally severe: the median survival as measured by the Kaplan-Meier method was 6.9 months. Thirteen children died at a median age of 61 days; ten of them were treated with a palliative procedure. Five children had achieved respiratory independence but suffered from a small delay in motor development. Among the three children who continuously required ventilatory support, only one survived (follow-up period: 23 months); he was the only one undergoing tracheostomy in the cohort. Diagnostic processes were different, leading to pathological and genetic diagnosis for only six infants. There was only histological orientation for seven and no specific diagnostic orientation for the last six. These difficulties have led us to propose an exploration process based on the literature. CONCLUSION: This study highlights difficulties in obtaining a diagnosis and a precise prognosis for floppy ventilated infants. An exploration-standardized process for infants suspected of congenital neuromuscular diseases was made in order to standardize procedures. It could be used as a tool for all professionals involved.

[Is rapid intrapartum vaginal screening test of group B streptococci (GBS) during partum useful in identifying infants developing early-onset GBS sepsis in postpartum period?]. / Test de dépistage rapide intra partum du portage vaginal de streptocoque du groupe B (SGB) pour le repérage des nouveau-nés à risque d'infection néonatale précoce à SGB. Étude observationnelle analytique dans une maternité de type III.

INTRODUCTION: Group B streptococcus (GBS) is the most common infectious agent responsible for early-onset bacterial sepsis (EOS) in term newborns. French prevention of perinatal GBS disease guidelines recommend screening for maternal vaginal GBS colonization at the 9th month of pregnancy, and use of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) in case of detected GBS vaginal colonization. Peripheral bacterial sampling (gastric aspiration, ear, or meconium) and measurement of C-reactive protein (CRP) are performed in asymptomatic newborns in case of infectious risk factors and/or incomplete IAP. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the relation between a rapid intrapartum screening test for GBS during labor in term parturients and infants developing GBS EOS and in comparison to current recommendations. METHODS: We conducted an observational analytic single-center study, with use of a rapid intrapartum GBS screening test, at Toulouse University Hospital. RESULTS: A total of 1416 mother-newborn dyads were prospectively included between 31/01/2012 and 17/08/2012. Vaginal GBS colonization was found at the 9th month of pregnancy in 148 mothers (10.6 %), and 176 mothers (12.5 %) were screened positively at delivery using intrapartum GBS rapid polymerase chain reaction assay (GBS PCR) (P=0.025). No confirmed neonatal GBS EOS was found. Nine infants had suspected GBS EOS because of a positive peripheral bacterial finding and elevated CRP. In these infants, seven pregnant mothers were GBS-positive with GBS PCR assay during labor, and four women were positive on prenatal culture at the 9th month of pregnancy. The diagnostic values of the two tests highlighted a nonsignificant superiority of intrapartum GBS PCR assay (AUC=0.83 [0.68-0.97] vs. 0.67 [0.50-0.84]), (P=0.057). The negative predictive value was improved with intrapartum PCR assay (negative likelihood ratio [LR]: 0.3 [0.1-0.9] vs. 0.6 [0.4-1.1]). Intrapartum GBS PCR assay provided its best positive predictive value in the absence of complete AIP and without other infectious factors (positive LR: 21.3 [15.4-29.5]). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the intrapartum GBS PCR assay offers a better predictive value of GBS EOS than the usual vaginal culture swab at the 9th month but requires confirmation by large studies.