A roadmap to parathyroidectomy for kidney transplant candidates.

Chronic kidney disease mineral and bone disorder may persist after successful kidney transplantation. Persistent hyperparathyroidism has been identified in up to 80% of patients throughout the first year after kidney transplantation. International guidelines lack strict recommendations about the management of persistent hyperparathyroidism. However, it is associated with adverse graft and patient outcomes, including higher fracture risk and an increased risk of all-cause mortality and allograft loss. Secondary hyperparathyroidism may be treated medically (vitamin D, phosphate binders and calcimimetics) or surgically (parathyroidectomy). Guideline recommendations suggest medical therapy first but do not clarify optimal parathyroid hormone targets or indications and timing of parathyroidectomy. There are no clear guidelines or long-term studies about the impact of hyperparathyroidism therapy. Parathyroidectomy is more effective than medical treatment, although it is associated with increased short-term risks. Ideally parathyroidectomy should be performed before kidney transplantation to prevent persistent hyperparathyroidism and improve graft outcomes. We now propose a roadmap for the management of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients eligible for kidney transplantation that includes the indications and timing (pre- or post-kidney transplantation) of parathyroidectomy, the evaluation of parathyroid gland size and the integration of parathyroid gland size in the decision-making process by a multidisciplinary team of nephrologists, radiologists and surgeons.

Erratum to: A roadmap to parathyroidectomy for kidney transplant candidates.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfac050.].

Impact of the Type of Dialysis on Time to Transplantation: Is It Just a Matter of Immunity?

BACKGROUND: Renal transplantation represents the therapeutic gold standard in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD). Still the role of pre-transplant dialysis in affecting time to transplantation has yet to be determined. We wanted to verify whether the type of renal replacement therapy (hemodialysis vs. peritoneal dialysis) affects time to transplantation and to identify clinical features related to the longer time to transplantation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective single-center observational study on patients who had received a transplant in the Bologna Transplant Unit from 1991 to 2019, described through the analysis of digital transplant list documents for sex, age, body mass index (BMI), blood group, comorbidities, underlying disease, serology, type of dialysis, time to transplantation, Panel Reactive Antibodies (PRA) max, number of preformed anti Human Leukocyte Antigens (HLA) antibodies. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In the 1619 patients analyzed, we observed a significant difference in time to transplant, PRA max and Preformed Antibodies Number between patients who received Hemodialysis (HD) and Peritoneal dialysis (PD). Then we performed a multiple regression analysis with all the considered factors in order to identify features that support these differences. The clinical variables that independently and directly correlate with longer time to transplantation are PRA max (p < 0.0001), Antibodies number (p < 0.0001) and HD (p < 0.0001); though AB blood group (p < 0.0001), age (p < 0.003) and PD (p < 0.0001) inversely correlate with time to transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: In our work, PD population received renal transplants in a shorter period of time compared to HD and turned out to be less immunized. Considering immunization, the type of dialysis impacts both on PRA max and on anti HLA antibodies.

Functional Abnormalities and Thyroid Nodules in Patients with End-stage Renal Disease.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Clinical and subclinical hypothyroidism is more common in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) than in the general population. Patients with ESRD with hypothyroidism are more susceptible to cardiovascular disease, with an increased risk of mortality than those with normal thyroid function. Moreover, these patients have higher incidence of benign and malignant nodules. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study on 2,147 patients with ESRD on the renal transplant waiting list between 2000 and 2015 aimed at identifying the presence of hypothyroidism and associated variables. RESULTS: Hypothyroidism was detected in 437/2,147 (20.3%) patients, 289 of them having the subclinical form. Cardiovascular disease and older age were significantly associated with hypothyroidism, and autosomal polycystic kidney disease was correlated to goiter (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Thyroid abnormalities, particularly hypothyroidism with nodules, should be investigated in patients with ESRD on a waiting list for renal transplant to control cardiovascular complications and cancer risk.

Standard heparin versus low-molecular-weight heparin. A medium-term comparison in hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: To compare standard heparin (SH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in terms of anticoagulation, platelet activation and lipid metabolism, we selected 54 patients who had been on 4-hour hemodialysis three times weekly for at least 12 months, without bleeding disorders or dyslipidemic diseases. 28 were on hemodialysis with Polysulfone low-flux, 26 were on hemodiafiltration with Polysulfone high-flux. All patients underwent EPO. METHODS: During the first 18 months, we administered SH 1,500 IU on starting dialysis and 1,500 +/- 500 IU in continuous intradialytic infusion per session. In the following 18 months, we administered LMWH 64.6 IU/kg on starting dialysis in a single arterious bolus. We assessed aPTT, anti-factor Xa activity, TAT and FPA, beta-TG and PF4. Blood samples were taken monthly at times 0, 30, 60, 180 and 240 min, as well as 1, 4 and 20 h after dialysis end. Predialysis cholesterol, HDL, LDL, triglycerides and lipoprotein(a) were checked monthly. RESULTS: During both LMWH and SH sessions no clotting or major bleeding complications were observed. APTT with LMWH was lower than that found with SH (p < 0.001); aFXa using LMWH was higher than when using SH (p < 0.001); TAT and FPA were lower in LMWH sessions (p < 0.01) than in SH sessions. We also detected lower beta-TG (p < 0.05) and PF4 levels (p < 0.05) using LMWH than using SH. As regards lipids, we only observed a significant decrease in triglycerides after 18 months of LMWH treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of LMWH during hemodialysis affords a safe and effective alternative to SH, and causes reduced platelet activation.