How much gambling is too much? Identifying potential problem gambling among adolescents.

AIMS: Using a population-based sample of Finnish 12-17 year olds, this study explored gambling behaviour limits for potential problem gambling [South Oaks Gambling Screen - revised for adolescents (SOGS-RA)]. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Youth Gambling Survey 2006, which is a cross-sectional survey of a nationally representative random sample of 5000 adolescents. Adolescents who participated in gambling at least once a month were selected from the data (n=1827, 25.1% were girls). The limits for gambling behaviour were detected using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Logistic regression was used to study associations between these behavioural limits and potential problem gambling. RESULTS: For each of the gambling behaviour indicators plotted, the risk curves showed similar trends among boys and girls. The risk of being a potential problem gambler increased noticeably with increasing gambling intensity. The ROC analysis showed that the optimal behavioural cut-off values among 12-14 year olds for frequency was gambling more than 2-3 times a month, spending more than €2 per week on gambling, spending more than €8 in any 1 day on gambling, and gambling on more than two different games per year. For 15-17 year olds, cut-off values were gambling more than once a week, spending more than €4 per week and spending more than €12 in any 1 day on gambling. Cut-off for number of game types was same as it was for younger adolescents. Of the behavioural indicators those associated with money were the most robust. CONCLUSION: Behavioural indicators can be used as initial markers of possible problem gambling.

The extent and distribution of gambling harm in Finland as assessed by the Problem Gambling Severity Index.

BACKGROUND: Preventing gambling harm has become a policy priority in many European countries. Adverse consequences related to problem gambling are well known, but few studies have analyzed gambling-related harm in detail in general population samples. We determined the extent and distribution of gambling harm in Finland, as assessed by the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI), and analyzed gambling involvement, demographics and their association with various types of harm. METHODS: A nationwide telephone survey was conducted among 4484 Finns aged 15-74 years in 2011-12. Gambling-related harms were based on the nine-item PGSI. Gambling involvement was measured by gambling frequency and weekly average gambling expenditure. Associations among harms, demographics and gambling involvement were examined in logistic regression. RESULTS: During the previous year, 13% of respondents experienced at least one gambling-related harm (males 18.1%, females 7.2%). The four commonest harms were 'chasing losses' (8.6%), 'escalating gambling to maintain excitement' (3.1%), 'betting more than could afford to lose' (2.8%), and 'feeling guilty' (2.6%). The harm profile in descending order was the same for both genders but differed in prevalence. Young age (<25 years) was associated with increased likelihood of reporting harms. Both monthly and weekly gambling and spending over €21 per week on gambling were related to the harms. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide support for the public health approach to gambling: harms were reported even at low gambling frequency-expenditure levels. In addition to the high-risk approach, adopting a population-level approach to preventing gambling harm could shift the population distribution of harm in a lower direction.

Persistence of socioeconomic differences in adolescents' environmental tobacco smoke exposure in Finland: 1991-2009.

AIMS: Socioeconomic differences in children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) in favour of those with higher positions are known, but research is scarce on whether differences have persisted when smoking restrictions have been tightened. We examined socioeconomic differences in adolescents' ETS exposure from 1991 to 2009 in Finland where the tobacco law has gradually restricted smoking of population. METHODS: National cross-sectional surveys (1991-2009) in 12-18-year-olds (N=72,726, response rate 77-56%). An outcome measure was self-reported exposure to ETS (≥ 1 hour/day). Parents' socioeconomic and adolescent's individual social position (school performance/career) were used as independent variables. Across four time periods, associations were studied by logistic regression. RESULTS: Over the study period 1991-2009, the proportion of adolescents exposed to ETS decreased from 17% to 6% (p ≤ 0.001). There were large and persistent differences between socioeconomic and parents' smoking groups. The decrease occurred in all groups but was smaller among 16-18-year-olds whose father had a low education. A steeper decline occurred among 16-18-year-olds who were not in school or were in vocational school with poor school performance compared with those with more advanced educational career. Compared with other subgroups, the decline in ETS exposure was greater among those whose parents were smokers. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents' ETS exposure remarkably decreased over time, when tobacco control measures were tightened, particularly among children of smoking parents. Socioeconomic differences persisted although diminishing differences were observed between educational groups at age 16-18.

Adolescents' self-reported reasons for using nicotine replacement therapy products: a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Available research provides evidence that adolescents use nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) products. Yet, little is known about reasons and motives behind their use. The present study examined the reasons for NRT use among 14-18-year-old Finnish adolescents. METHOD: A national Adolescent Health and Lifestyle Survey was conducted in Finland in 2009 (N=4834, response rate 55%). Main measures were prevalence of NRT use, self-reported reasons for using NRT and smoking status. RESULTS: Overall, 10% had used NRT. Boys used NRT more often than girls (11.5% versus 8.7%, p<.001). The three most commonly reported reasons were 'just try' (56%), 'to quit' (33%) and 'smoking not possible' (24%). "Just try" was the most common reason given by non-smokers/experimental smokers whereas daily/occasional smokers used NRT mainly for quitting purposes and when smoking was impossible. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that when planning treatment plans for adolescent smokers, health care personnel should pay particular attention to adolescents' primary reasons and motives for using NRT before suggesting its use.