Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Orthop Trauma ; 21: 101564, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34458093

ABSTRACT

Although our understanding of axial spondyloarthropathy (axSpA) has increased recently, there has not been a concurrent improvement in patient diagnosis with delays contributing to patient morbidity. Imaging findings of axSpA can be subtle and may be dismissed often due to lack of understanding by reporters and importantly clinicians who do not suspect the disease. Recognition of the importance of imaging has led to the inclusion of MRI as part of the diagnostic criteria for axSpA. With this in mind, a number of advancements have been made in an attempt to increase our diagnostic accuracy on imaging. This article will give an overview of these techniques as well as a recap of the imaging features of axSpA.

2.
Eur J Haematol ; 106(2): 267-272, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33159689

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Whilst excision biopsy is traditionally preferred, advances in radiological and histological techniques warrant a re-look at core biopsy as a viable primary diagnostic method. METHOD: Over a 3-year period, all patients who underwent core biopsy to investigate lymphoma at our centre were included. RESULTS: 554 consecutive patients were included (40.1% prior lymphoma and 59.4% new presentations). Three or more cores were taken in 420 (75.8%) cases. Median time from request to biopsy and biopsy to histology report was 2 (0-40) days and 7 (1-24) days, respectively. 510/544 (93.8%) biopsies were diagnostic. There was no difference in whether the biopsy was diagnostic based on indication (new vs. relapsed lymphoma) (P = .445), whether biopsy was PET-directed (P = .507), for T-cell lymphoma (P = .468) or nodal vs. extra-nodal (P = .693). Thirty-eight patients (6.9%) required a second biopsy due to inadequate tissue. In a patient experience survey, only 13.9% reported any complications (1 self-limiting minor bleeding, 4 bruising) whilst 16.7% reported any discomfort beyond 12 hours. CONCLUSION: Core biopsy performed by experienced radiologists and analysed by expert haemato-pathologists is a reliable, well-tolerated method for diagnosing lymphoma and confirming relapse. Multiple cores can be obtained under local anaesthetic yielding sufficient material in the majority of cases.


Subject(s)
Biopsy, Large-Core Needle , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymphoproliferative Disorders/diagnosis , Biopsy , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle/methods , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle/standards , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy , Lymph Node Excision , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...