Spare the Nipple: A Systematic Review of Tumor Nipple-Distance and Oncologic Outcomes in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: Preserving the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) in breast cancer surgery improves patient satisfaction and quality of life. The oncologic safety of NSM in tumors < 2 cm from the nipple remains in question. We conducted a systematic review to determine whether TND < 2 cm was associated with increased risk of LRR in patients undergoing NSM. METHODS: We included studies of invasive or in situ breast cancer < 2 cm from NAC undergoing NSM which reported LRR rates. LRR rates were stratified by TND and culminated across studies. Cohort study quality was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Criteria. Meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity in reporting survival outcomes. RESULTS: We identified seven retrospective cohort studies with 2295 patients and 18 case series with 3507 patients. Direct tumor involvement of NAC was considered an absolute contraindication to NSM in all studies. In cohort studies, median follow-up was 31-112 (range 14-204) months. Cohorts with TND < 2 cm did not have a significantly higher rate of LRR. Amongst case series, 275 patients had TND < 2 cm. Combined LRR in case series was 2.6%, with median follow-up 10.4-71 (range 0-158) months. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review did not identify TND < 2 cm as a significant risk factor for LRR. NSM appears oncologically safe in select patients with TND < 2 cm. Given the improved quality of life associated with NSM compared to skin-sparing mastectomy, we suggest NSM as the procedure of choice in appropriately selected patients.

Predictors of axillary node response in node-positive patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The ability to accurately predict which patients will achieve a pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy could help identify those who could safely be spared the potential morbidity of axillary lymph node dissection. We performed a retrospective analysis of a cohort of clinically node-positive patients managed with neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the goal of identifying predictors of axillary pCR. METHODS: Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had clinical T1-T4, N1-N3, M0 breast cancer and received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical axillary lymph node staging between 2001 and 2017 at Misericordia Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta. Patient data, including tumour characteristics, details of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, imaging results before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and final pathologic analysis, were collected from the appropriate provincial electronic data repositories. We summarized the data using descriptive statistics. We characterized associations between clinical/tumour characteristics and pCR using univariate and multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 323 patients included in the study, 130 (40.2%) achieved axillary pCR. Absence of residual disease in the breast was associated with axillary pCR (odds ratio 6.74, 95% confidence interval 2.89-15.67). HER2-positive, triple-negative and ER-positive/PR-negative/HER2-negative tumours were significantly associated with a pCR on univariate analysis; the association trended toward significance on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the routine use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with an absence of residual disease in the breast, and potentially in those with HER2-positive or triple-negative subtypes, and highlight the ER-positive/PR-negative biomarker subtype as a potential predictor of nodal response.

Tamoxifen with radiotherapy compared with Tamoxifen alone in elderly women with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conserving surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to assess the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on recurrence and survival for elderly women (≥70) with early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) and Tamoxifen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews were systematically searched through August 12, 2016 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing radiotherapy to no radiotherapy and presenting outcomes for women ≥70years. Two investigators screened citations, abstracted results, and appraised studies using Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Pooled risk ratios (RR) for breast, axillary, and distant recurrence, and overall survival were determined using weights from fixed-effects models. RESULTS: Four RCTs with low risk of bias were identified (2387 elderly women). Tamoxifen plus radiotherapy reduced breast recurrence compared to Tamoxifen alone from 60 to 10 (95% CI 6-20) per 1000 patients at 5years (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.10-0.34; 4 trials, 2387 patients). This effect was maintained at 10years (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.13-0.54; 2 trials, 891 patients). Radiotherapy minimally reduced axillary recurrence from 12 to 3 (95% CI 1-10) per 1000 at 5years (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.10-0.81; 3 trials, 2287 patients). Radiotherapy did not affect distant recurrence (RR 1.49, 95% CI 0.87-2.54; 3 trials, 2287 patients) or overall survival (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.79-1.22; 3 trials, 2287 patients). CONCLUSION: For elderly women (≥70), radiotherapy reduces the risk of breast and axillary recurrence, but does not impact distant recurrence or overall survival in early-stage breast cancer treated with BCS and Tamoxifen. The value of this risk reduction must be weighed by women and their physicians when considering the omission of adjuvant radiotherapy.