Kinematics of passive flexion following balanced and overstuffed fixed bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Progression of osteoarthritis in the unreplaced compartment following unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) may be hastened if kinematics is disturbed following UKA implantation. The purpose of this study was to analyze tibiofemoral kinematics of the balanced and overstuffed UKA in comparison with the native knee during passive flexion since this is a common clinical assessment. METHODS: Ten cadaveric knees were mounted to robotic manipulator and underwent passive flexion from 0 to 90°. The kinematic pathway was recorded in the native knee and in the balanced, fixed bearing UKA. The medial UKA was implanted using a measured resection technique. Additionally, a one millimeter thicker tibial insert was installed to simulate the effects of overstuffing. Tibial kinematics in relation to the femur was recorded. RESULTS: Following UKA the tibia was externally rotated, and in valgus relative to the native knee near extension. In flexion, installing the UKA caused the knee to be translated medially and anteriorly. The tibia was translated distally through the entire range of flexion after UKA. Compared to the balanced UKA, overstuffing further increased valgus at full extension and distal translation of the tibia from full extension to 45° flexion. CONCLUSIONS: UKA implantation altered tibiofemoral kinematics in all planes. Differences were small; nevertheless, they may affect tibiofemoral loading patterns. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Alterations in tibiofemoral kinematics following UKA might have implications for prosthesis failure and progression of osteoarthritis in the remaining compartment. Overstuffing should be avoided as it further increased valgus and did not improve the remaining kinematics.

Frontal plane stability following UKA in a biomechanical study.

INTRODUCTION: Function and kinematics following unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) have been reported to be close to the native knee. Gait, stair climbing and activities of daily living expose the knee joint to a combination of varus and valgus moments. Replacement of the medial compartment via UKA is likely to change the physiologic knee stability and its ability to respond to varus and valgus moments. It was hypothesized that UKA implantation would stiffen the knee and decrease range of motion in the frontal plane. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six fresh frozen cadaver knees were prepared and mounted in a six-degrees-of-freedom robot. An axial load of 200 N was applied with the knee in 15°, 45° and 90° of flexion. Varus and valgus moments were added, respectively, before and after implantation of medial UKA. Tests were than redone with a thicker polyethylene inlay to simulate overstuffing of the medial compartment. Range of motion in the frontal plane and the tibial response to moments were recorded via the industrial robot. RESULTS: The range of motion in the frontal plane was decreased with both, balanced and overstuffed UKA and shifted towards valgus. When exposed to valgus moments, knees following UKA were stiffer in comparison with the native knee. The effect was even more pronounced with medial overstuffing. CONCLUSION: In UKA, the compressive anatomy is replaced by much stiffer components. This lack of medial compression and relative overstuffing leads to a tighter medial collateral ligament. This drives the trend towards a stiffer joint as documented by a decrease in frontal plane range of motion. Overstuffing should strictly be avoided when performing UKA.

Accuracy of Individualized Custom Tibial Cutting Guides in UKA.

BACKGROUND: Component malposition is one of the major reasons for early failure of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: It was investigated how reproducibly patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) achieved preoperatively planned placement of the tibial component in UKA specifically assessing coronal alignment, slope and flexion of the components and axial rotation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Based on computer tomography models of ten cadaver legs, PSI jigs were generated to guide cuts perpendicular to the tibial axis in the coronal and sagittal planes and in neutral axial rotation. Deviation ≥3° from the designed orientation in a postoperative CT was defined as outside the range of acceptable alignment. RESULTS: Mean coronal alignment was 0.4 ± 3.2° varus with two outliers. Mean slope was 2.8 ± 3.9° with six components in excessive flexion. It was noted that the implants were put in a mean of 1.7 ± 8.0° of external rotation with seven outliers. CONCLUSIONS: PSI helped achieve the planned coronal orientation of the component. The guides were less accurate in setting optimal tray rotation and slope.