Analysis of risk factors and treatment outcome in patients presenting with neglected congenital spinal deformity and neurological deficit.

PURPOSE: Congenital spinal deformities (CSD) are uncommon; and usually present during early childhood. Rarely, patients have been reported to present with neglected CSD in association with myelopathy. The current study reports the largest series of patients with neglected CSD and major neuro-deficit; and discusses their long-term outcome. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed patients with CSD who presented with myelopathy and underwent surgical management between January 2008 and January 2018. Only patients who had complete clinico-radiological records and completed minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Neurology was graded according to American Spinal Injury Association Impairment, Nurick and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores. Radiological details like deformity type, location, magnitude, and underlying anomaly were recorded. A comparative analysis of parameters between pre-operative and final follow-up periods was performed. RESULTS: Thirty three (age = 21.1 ± 11.9 years) patients with CSD and myelopathy were included. Mean duration since myelopathy was 5.2 ± 6.2 months. Thirty (91%) patients presented with kyphosis or kyphoscoliosis; and 18 had upper thoracic-level lesion (12 and 3 with mid- or low-thoracic and lumbar lesions). 16 (48.5%) and 12 (36.4%) presented with types 1 and 3 anomalies, respectively. Mean pre-operative mJOA and Nurick grades were 8.8 ± 2.4 and 3.4 ± 0.7. Based on ASIA score, 2, 5, 21 and five patients presented with grades A, C, D and E, respectively. All patients underwent surgeries from posterior-only approach. Mean follow-up was 4.7 ± 2.6 years. In kyphoscoliosis group, coronal and sagittal Cobb improved by 23.8° and 25.9°, respectively. Mean deformity improved by 19.6° and 15.6° in scoliosis and kyphosis groups, respectively. Neurological status improved in 5, remained stable in 23 and deteriorated in five patients. Mean mJOA and Nurick grades at final follow-up was 8.3 ± 3.1and 3.4 ± 0.9. CONCLUSION: Major neurological deficit is a rare complication of neglected CSD. In our series, such a presentation was observed in patients with kyphotic or kyphoscoliotic deformities, type 1 or 3 vertebral anomalies and proximal thoracic vertebral lesions. Surgery can be valuable in these patients, as it not only stabilises deformity, but also provides the best chance of preventing neuro-deterioration.

Validation Study of Rajasekaran's Kyphosis Classification System: Do We Clearly Understand Single- and Two-Column Deficiencies?

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter validation study. PURPOSE: To evaluate the inter-rater reliability of Rajasekaran's kyphosis classification through a multicenter validation study. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The classification of kyphosis, developed by Rajasekaran, incorporates factors related to curve characteristics, including column deficiency, disc mobility, curve magnitude, and osteotomy requirements. Although the classification offers significant benefits in determining prognosis and management decisions, it has not been subjected to multicenter validation. METHODS: A total of 30 sets of images, including plain radiographs, computed tomography scans, and magnetic resonance imaging scans, were randomly selected from our hospital patient database. All patients had undergone deformity correction surgery for kyphosis. Twelve spine surgeons from the Asia-Pacific region (six different countries) independently evaluated and classified the deformity types and proposed their surgical recommendations. This information was then compared with standard deformity classification and surgical recommendations. RESULTS: The kappa coefficients for the classification were as follows: 0.88 for type 1A, 0.78 for type 1B, 0.50 for type 2B, 0.40 for type 3A, 0.63 for type 3B, and 0.86 for type 3C deformities. The overall kappa coefficient for the classification was 0.68. Regarding the repeatability of osteotomy recommendations, kappa values were the highest for Ponte's (Schwab type 2) osteotomy (kappa 0.8). Kappa values for other osteotomy recommendations were 0.52 for pedicle subtraction/disc-bone osteotomy (Schwab type 3/4), 0.42 for vertebral column resection (VCR, type 5), and 0.30 for multilevel VCRs (type 6). CONCLUSIONS: Excellent accuracy was found for types 1A, 1B, and 3C deformities (ends of spectrum). There was more variation among surgeons in differentiating between one-column (types 2A and 2B) and two-column (types 3A and 3B) deficiencies, as surgeons often failed to recognize the radiological signs of posterior column failure. This failure to identify column deficiencies can potentially alter kyphosis management. There was excellent consensus among surgeons in the recommendation of type 2 osteotomy; however, some variation was observed in their choice for other osteotomies.