Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 99(4): 854-858, 2017 11 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28847411

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To inform goals of care discussions at the time of palliative radiation therapy (RT) consultation, we sought to characterize intensive care unit (ICU) outcomes for patients treated with palliative RT compared to all other patients with metastatic cancer admitted to the ICU. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with metastatic cancer admitted to an ICU in a tertiary medical center from January 2010 to September 2015. We compared in-hospital mortality between patients who received palliative RT in the 12 months before admission and all other patients with metastatic cancer. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association between receipt of palliative RT and in-hospital mortality, adjusting for patient characteristics and acute illness severity. RESULTS: Among 1424 patients with metastatic cancer, 11.3% (n=161) received palliative RT before ICU admission. In-hospital mortality was 36.7% for palliative RT patients, compared with 16.6% for other patients with metastatic cancer (P<.001). Receipt of palliative RT was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 2.08, 95% confidence interval 1.34-3.21, P=.001), after adjusting for patient characteristics and severity of critical illness. Only 34 patients (21.1%) treated with palliative RT received additional cancer-directed treatment after ICU admission. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with metastatic cancer, prior treatment with palliative RT is associated with increased in-hospital mortality after ICU admission. Nearly half of patients previously treated with palliative RT either died during hospitalization or were discharged with hospice care, and few received further cancer-directed therapy. Palliative RT referral may represent an opportunity to discuss end-of-life treatment preferences with patients and families.


Subject(s)
Hospital Mortality , Intensive Care Units , Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Palliative Care/methods , Terminal Care , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Hospice Care/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/pathology , Odds Ratio , Organ Dysfunction Scores , Palliative Care/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Terminal Care/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome
2.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 24(5): 1258-1261, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27853900

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT), and to identify risk factors associated with complications. MATERIALS/METHODS: We evaluated patients with early-stage breast cancer treated from January 1, 2011 to January 31, 2014 with BCS and IORT at a single institution. The presence of breast cancer recurrences, complications, or fat necrosis were assessed at subsequent follow-up visits using physical examination and breast imaging. RESULTS: Overall, 113 patients, of whom three were undergoing bilateral treatments, were identified. The median length of time for IORT was 29 min and 36 s (range 15:50-59:00). Fifteen patients received additional external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and the median follow-up was 40.3 months (range 1.6-58.3) for all patients. To date, one biopsy-proven ipsilateral recurrence has been noted (0.9%), for which the patient elected to undergo a mastectomy. Nine patients were found to have wound complications (7.7%) and two had fat necrosis (1.7%) on follow-up. Of all the evaluated risk factors, only applicator size (p < 0.01) had a statistically significant association with an increase in complications. CONCLUSIONS: With a short follow-up, IORT appears to be a safe treatment modality for a select group of patients, leading to a reasonable increase in operating room time and complication rates following BCS. The utilization of larger applicators at the time of IORT was associated with an increase in wound complications and fat necrosis.


Subject(s)
Adipose Tissue/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Mastectomy, Segmental/adverse effects , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Intraoperative Care/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Necrosis/etiology , Neoplasm Staging , Radiotherapy/instrumentation , Risk Factors
3.
Brachytherapy ; 15(5): 549-53, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27317190

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the factors that correlate with cylinder size in vaginal brachytherapy (VB) after hysterectomy for endometrial carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients treated for endometrial cancer from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2013 were reviewed from a single institution. Patients included underwent total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy followed by high-dose-rate VB with or without external beam pelvic radiotherapy (EBRT). According to institutional guidelines, the vaginal cylinder size selected was the largest diameter cylinder the patient could comfortably accommodate. Patient, tumor, and treatment factors were recorded and compared with cylinder size. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-one eligible patients were identified, including 121 patients treated with pelvic radiotherapy (RT) before VB and 260 treated with VB alone. On univariate analysis, weight (p = 0.0004), body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.001), and receipt of pelvic RT (p ≤ 0.0001) were the only statistically significant factors correlated with vaginal cylinder size. On multivariate analysis, receipt of EBRT retained significance after adjusting for weight or BMI. In patients receiving VB alone, median cylinder size was 3 cm; after pelvic RT, it was 2.5 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Higher weight and BMI correlated with accommodation of larger cylinder size. Accounting for this, the receipt of EBRT before VB was associated with smaller cylinder size. Dosimetric data show that larger cylinder size provides superior dose distribution. Although historically the VB boost follows EBRT, reversal of this order may be preferred.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy , Carcinoma/radiotherapy , Endometrial Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brachytherapy/instrumentation , Carcinoma/surgery , Endometrial Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy , Middle Aged , Ovariectomy , Pelvis , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Salpingectomy , Vagina
4.
J Gastrointest Cancer ; 47(2): 196-201, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27112332

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): The purpose of this study was to compare oncologic outcomes and toxicity profile of hypofractionated conformal radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent full-dose gemcitabine versus standard fractionation RT with concurrent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the treatment of unresectable non-metastatic pancreatic cancer. MATERIALS/METHODS: Patients with unresectable non-metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas treated at three institutions were included. All patients were treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) consisting of either hypofractionated RT to the gross disease concurrent with a full-dose gemcitabine-based regimen versus standard fractionation RT to the tumor and elective nodes concurrent with 5-FU. End points included rates of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities, overall survival (OS), and distant metastasis free survival (DMFS). RESULTS: From January 1999 to December 2009, 170 patients were identified (118 RT/gemcitabine, 52 RT/5-FU). There were no differences in demographic or clinical factors. Acute GI toxicities (grades <3 versus ≥3) were 82.2 and 17.8 %, respectively, for patients treated with RT/gemcitabine and 78.9 and 21.2 % for those treated with RT/5-FU (p = 0.67). Late GI toxicities (grades <3 versus ≥3) were 88.1 and 11.9 %, respectively, for RT/gemcitabine and 80.8 and 19.2 % for RT/5-FU (p = 0.23). OS for RT/gemcitabine and RT/5-FU were 52 versus 36 % at 1 year and 14 versus 6 % at 2 years favoring the RT/gemcitabine group (p = 0.02). DMFS at 1 and 2 years for RT/gemcitabine were 41 and 11 % versus 24 and 4 % for RT/5-FU (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: RT/gemcitabine was equivalent in toxicity to RT/5-FU but was associated with superior OS and DMFS. When RT is used in the treatment of unresectable pancreatic cancer, hypofractionated conformal RT with concurrent full-dose gemcitabine may be the preferred approach.


Subject(s)
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/adverse effects , Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Deoxycytidine/adverse effects , Deoxycytidine/therapeutic use , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiotherapy, Conformal/adverse effects , Radiotherapy, Conformal/methods , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Gemcitabine , Pancreatic Neoplasms
5.
J Neurooncol ; 108(1): 141-6, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22426925

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study is to evaluate the patterns of relapse and survival trends in patients with single brain metastases treated with post-operative adjuvant Gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKS) without whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients who underwent GKS to the tumor cavity following resection of solitary brain metastasis was performed at a single institution. Between March 2001 and June 2010, 56 patients underwent GKS to the resection cavity following resection of intracranial metastases; no patient received pre- or post-operative WBRT as an adjuvant (salvage WBRT was permissible). The mean marginal dose was 17.1 Gy (range 14-20 Gy). The mean follow-up period was 24 months (range 3-99 months). Five patients (8.9%) had local recurrence in the immediate vicinity of the resection cavity, qualifying as "local failures", and 21 (37.5%) recurred at distant intracranial sites. Median intracranial recurrence free survival was 13 months. Median overall survival was 20.5 months. Salvage interventions were required in 26 patients, and included repeat radiosurgery in 17 patients, further surgery in two patients, and salvage WBRT in eight (14.3%; two of whom had also been locally salvaged with repeat radiosurgery) patients. As expected, avoidance of WBRT results in a high rate of intracranial failure (26/56 patients, 46%), even in well-selected patients with only single brain metastases. As anticipated, the majority of failures (21, 37.5%) are "distant intracranial", and in this well-selected cohort the local failure rate is low (5/56 patients, <9%). All patients failing intracranially (46%) are potential candidates for salvage therapies, but WBRT as salvage was utilized in only 14.3% of patients. The median intracranial relapse-free was 13 months and overall survival was 20.5 months.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/mortality , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Radiosurgery/methods , Adult , Aged , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/therapy , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
6.
J Contemp Brachytherapy ; 4(3): 135-40, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23346142

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The optimal dosimetric parameters and planning techniques for high-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy (HDR-VB) are unclear. Our aim was to evaluate the utility of bladder and rectal dosimetry for patients receiving HDR-VB for postoperative treatment of endometrial carcinoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with endometrial cancer who underwent postoperative HDR-VB from January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2010 were included. All patients underwent primary surgery consisting of total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophrectomy (TH-BSO) with or without lymph node dissection and were treated with HDR-VB without pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or chemotherapy. Demographic, pathologic, dosimetric and clinical data were collected. RESULTS: One hundred patients were identified with the majority of patients receiving HDR-VB in 700 cGy × 3 fractions (45%) or 550 cGy x 4 fractions (53%). No plan was altered based on bladder dosimetry at the time of planning. The rate of acute urinary reactions (< 90 days from beginning of RT) grades 1 and 2 were 14% and 2%, respectively. The rate of late urinary reactions (> 90 days after RT) grades 1 and 2 were 7% and 3%, respectively. Dose to the bladder point did not correlate with urinary toxicity. No rectal toxicity was reported by patients receiving HDR-VB. CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of HDR-VB without EBRT, the measured dose to the bladder point does not predict urinary toxicity and is very unlikely to indicate the need to change the treatment plan. The treatment of endometrial carcinoma utilizing HDR-VB alone is associated with very low rates of high-grade acute or late bladder toxicity.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...