Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Obstet Gynecol ; 65(4): 733-738, 2022 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35708963

ABSTRACT

It is estimated that 450,000 American women are at increased risk of infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and yet only 7% have a prescription for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). PrEP is a safe and effective method of HIV infection prevention via a daily use of an oral combination antiretroviral pill or longer-acting intramuscular injections. Gynecologists are experts in women's sexual health, and provide over half of annual preventative health visits, but are not yet routinely providing PrEP to patients, citing lack of knowledge as a major barrier. The authors aim to provide the general gynecologist with the skills to expertly provide PrEP to their patients to reduce HIV infection.


Subject(s)
Gynecology , HIV Infections , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Humans , Female , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Sexual Behavior , Women's Health
2.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 35(20): 3937-3942, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33172318

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the morbidity of Foley balloon for cervical ripening in comparison to oxytocin alone in women with a prior cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: A four-hospital retrospective review of all women with viable singleton pregnancies and history of a single prior cesarean delivery presenting for cervical ripening between 1994 and 2015. Exposure groups were either Foley balloon or oxytocin, at the treating physician's discretion. The primary outcome was defined as maternal morbidity, evaluated by a composite that included hemorrhage, and/or uterine infection, and/or uterine rupture. We defined two secondary outcomes: neonatal morbidity, and vaginal delivery rate. Neonatal morbidity was evaluated by a composite that included five-minute APGAR score <7 and/or NICU admission. We adjusted results for potential confounding variables, including hospital site, maternal age and race, initial cervical dilation, and gestational age at delivery. RESULTS: We identified 688 patients who received ripening, 276 by Foley balloon and 412 by oxytocin. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome of maternal morbidity between groups: 38 (13.8%) in the Foley balloon group and 79 (19.2%) in the oxytocin group (aOR 1.43; 95% CI, 0.90-2.27). There was no significant difference in the secondary outcome of neonatal morbidity: 31 (11.3%) in the Foley balloon group and 51 (12.4%) in the oxytocin group (aOR 1.02; 95% CI, 0.57-1.80). The rate of vaginal delivery was significantly less in the Foley balloon group compared to the oxytocin group: 56.2% vs 64.1%, p = .037. CONCLUSION: When cervical ripening with either Foley balloon or oxytocin was utilized at the physician's discretion in women with prior cesarean, there was no identified difference in maternal and neonatal morbidity, but the rate of successful vaginal delivery was lower.


Subject(s)
Cervical Ripening , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Labor, Induced/adverse effects , Labor, Induced/methods , Morbidity , Oxytocin , Pregnancy
3.
Contraception ; 111: 32-38, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34153317

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We sought to systematically review the literature on values and preferences regarding contraception among individuals within selected key populations. STUDY DESIGN: As part of a larger set of reviews on patients' and providers' values and preferences related to contraception globally, we searched ten electronic databases for articles from January 1, 2005 to July 27, 2020. No language restrictions were applied. Data was independently abstracted by two authors and study rigor was assessed using an 8-item measure developed by the Evidence Project for quantitative studies and an adapted CASP checklist for qualitative studies. RESULTS: We identified 12 studies that met our inclusion criteria examining selected key populations, including sex workers, transmasculine individuals, people who inject drugs, or those living in humanitarian contexts. Seven key themes that spoke to values and preferences emerged related to: autonomy, perceived effectiveness and safety, birth spacing and family outcomes, impacts on sexual experience, hormonal effects (e.g. desire for non-hormonal method or perception that the method is more natural as compared to hormonal methods), physical attributes (e.g. appearance and/or ease of use), and stigma. Six studies were of high rigor, five were of moderate rigor, and one was of low rigor. One study described the values and preferences of two of the selected key populations. The research available on the values and preferences of sex workers regarding methods of contraception was limited to female condoms. CONCLUSION: Consideration of the values and preferences of individuals within selected key populations can inform providers, programme managers and policy makers participating in the delivery of contraceptive care. Contraceptive research among sex workers, transmasculine individuals, people who inject drugs, or those living in humanitarian contexts is quite limited; further research is needed to better understand the values and preferences of these populations.


Subject(s)
Drug Users , Sex Workers , Contraception/methods , Contraceptive Agents , Female , Humans , Pharmaceutical Preparations
4.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care ; 26(2): 98-104, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33164593

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of comparing the rates of positive depression screens at 6 weeks and 3 months postpartum in women using immediate postpartum etonogestrel implant (ENG-implant) and women using non-hormonal contraception or sterilisation. METHODS: This was a pilot prospective cohort study performed to test the design adequacy of comparing the rates of positive postpartum PHQ-9 screens (≥10) in women using immediate postpartum ENG-implant and women using non-hormonal contraception or sterilisation. Participants were recruited during the third trimester of pregnancy or during delivery hospitalisation. They self-allocated to one of the two comparison groups. PHQ-9 surveys were administered during the third trimester of pregnancy, immediately postpartum, and at 6 weeks and 3 months postpartum. RESULTS: Between June 2017 and March 2018, 91 patients were recruited. Of these patients, 11 were excluded and the remaining 80 were split evenly into each cohort. The women in the ENG-implant group were younger, less educated, and more often publicly insured. The percentage of participants with positive PHQ-9 screens were: 3% during the postpartum hospitalisation, 6.2% at 6 weeks postpartum, and 10.2% at 3 months postpartum. PHQ-9 scores were similar between groups at both postpartum time points. CONCLUSION: The rates of positive PHQ-9 screens at 6 weeks postpartum were similar between groups. These preliminary data suggest that immediate postpartum placement of the ENG-implant does not negatively impact the risk for a positive depression screen. Larger-scale, adequately powered studies are warranted to further investigate this finding.


Subject(s)
Contraceptive Agents, Female/adverse effects , Contraceptive Agents, Hormonal/adverse effects , Depression, Postpartum/epidemiology , Desogestrel/adverse effects , Drug Implants , Adult , Contraceptive Agents, Female/administration & dosage , Contraceptive Agents, Hormonal/administration & dosage , Desogestrel/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Pilot Projects , Postpartum Period , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies
5.
Adv Ther ; 36(6): 1246-1251, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31004327

ABSTRACT

Late second trimester dilation and evacuation is a challenging subset of surgical abortion. Among the reasons for this is the degree of cervical dilation required to safely extricate fetal parts. Cervical dilation is traditionally achieved by placing multiple sets of osmotic dilators over two or more days prior to the evacuation procedure; however, there is interest in shortening cervical preparation time. The use of adjuvant mifepristone and misoprostol in conjunction with osmotic dilators has been studied for this purpose, and their use demonstrates that adequate cervical dilation can be achieved in less time than with dilators alone. We present a review of the current evidence surrounding adjunctive agents for cervical preparation, and contend that for women presenting for surgical abortion care above 19 weeks gestation, the use of adjunctive mifepristone and/or misoprostol should be strongly considered along with osmotic dilator insertion when cervical preparation in less than 24 h is needed.


Subject(s)
Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal/therapeutic use , Cervix Uteri/surgery , Dilatation/methods , Extraction, Obstetrical/methods , Mifepristone/therapeutic use , Misoprostol/therapeutic use , Preoperative Care/methods , Adult , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, Second
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...