Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Behav Brain Res ; 306: 26-35, 2016 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26965568

ABSTRACT

Fish are increasingly popular subjects in behavioural and neurobiological research. It is therefore important that they are housed and handled appropriately to ensure good welfare and reliable scientific findings, and that species-appropriate behavioural tests (e.g. of cognitive/affective states) are developed. Routine handling of captive animals may cause physiological stress responses that lead to anxiety-like states (e.g. increased perception of danger). In fish, these may be particularly pronounced when handling during tank-to-tank transfer involves removal from water into air. Here we develop and use a new combined scototaxis (preference for dark over light areas) and novel-tank-diving test, alongside conventional open-field and novel-object tests, to measure the effects of transferring three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) between tanks using a box or net (in and out of water respectively). Preference tests for dark over light areas confirmed the presence of scototaxis in this species. Open-field and novel-object tests failed to detect any significant differences between net and box-handled fish. However, the combined diving and scototaxis detected consistent differences between the treatments. Net-handled fish spent less time on the dark side of the tank, less time in the bottom third, and kept a greater distance from the 'safe' bottom dark area than box-handled fish. Possible explanations for this reduction in anxiety-like behaviour in net-handled fish are discussed. The combined diving and scototaxis test may be a sensitive and taxon-appropriate method for measuring anxiety-like states in fish.


Subject(s)
Anxiety , Behavior, Animal/physiology , Handling, Psychological , Smegmamorpha/physiology , Animals , Anxiety/diagnosis , Anxiety/physiopathology , Anxiety/psychology , Disease Models, Animal , Exploratory Behavior , Female , Light , Male , Motor Activity/physiology , Statistics, Nonparametric
2.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther ; 298(1): 148-55, 2001 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11408536

ABSTRACT

Several reports describe substantive behavioral differences between strains of mice both at baseline and in response to pharmacological manipulations. For example, mouse strain differences have been reported in prepulse inhibition (PPI) and patterns of locomotor activity, two behavioral processes that are altered by dopamine (DA) agonists such as amphetamine. Here, we characterized acoustic and tactile startle reactivity, acoustic PPI, and both the amounts and spatial patterns of locomotor activity in C57BL/6J, 129SvEv (129S6), and 129SvJ (129X1) mice at baseline and in amphetamine dose-response studies. Because hearing loss is common in numerous strains of mice, we also assessed cross-modal PPI using a light prepulse with an airpuff startle stimulus. The results establish that these three inbred strains of mice display both intra- and cross-modal PPI, and that amphetamine decreases PPI and startle reactivity in a dose-, sensory modality-, and strain-specific manner. Furthermore, the amount of locomotor activity and the spatial pattern of motor sequences are altered differentially after treatment with amphetamine in C57BL/6J and 129X1 mice, but not in 129S6 mice. Given that amphetamine releases presynaptic DA, these findings are consistent with the role of DA in the modulation of PPI and motor patterns in mice. These findings highlight the importance of selecting appropriate strains of mice for behavioral, pharmacological, and genetic studies.


Subject(s)
Amphetamine/pharmacology , Dopamine Agents/pharmacology , Motor Activity/drug effects , Reflex, Startle/drug effects , Acoustic Stimulation , Animals , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Motor Activity/physiology , Reflex, Startle/physiology , Species Specificity
3.
J Neurosci ; 21(1): 305-13, 2001 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11150348

ABSTRACT

Dopamine is known to regulate several behavioral phenomena, including sensorimotor gating and aspects of motor activity. The roles of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in these behaviors have been documented in the rat literature, but few reports exist on their role in mice. We used dopamine transporter (DAT) (-/-) mice to examine the behavioral consequences of a chronically hyperdopaminergic state, challenging them with the preferential dopamine D2 receptor antagonist raclopride and D1 receptor antagonist SCH23390. At baseline, DAT (-/-) mice exhibited deficient sensorimotor gating as measured by prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle response, exhibited nonfocal preservative patterns of locomotion, and were hyperactive in a novel environment. Pretreatment with raclopride significantly increased PPI in the DAT (-/-) mice, whereas SCH23390 had no significant effect. Blockade of D2 receptors did not affect the predominantly straight patterns of motor behavior produced by the DAT (-/-) mice, but antagonism of D1 receptors significantly attenuated the preservative patterns, producing more of a meandering behavior seen in the DAT (+/+) control mice. Both D1 and D2 receptor antagonists decreased the hyperactivity seen in the DAT (-/-) mice. These findings support the role of the D2, but not the D1, receptor in the modulation of PPI in mice. Furthermore, D1 receptor activation appears to be the critical substrate for the expression of preservative patterns of motor behavior, whereas both D1 and D2 receptors appear to regulate the amount of motor activity.


Subject(s)
Carrier Proteins/metabolism , Dopamine Antagonists/administration & dosage , Hyperkinesis/physiopathology , Membrane Glycoproteins , Membrane Transport Proteins , Motor Activity/drug effects , Movement Disorders/physiopathology , Nerve Tissue Proteins , Neural Inhibition/drug effects , Animals , Behavior, Animal/drug effects , Benzazepines/administration & dosage , Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists , Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins , Female , Heterozygote , Homozygote , Injections, Intraperitoneal , Injections, Subcutaneous , Male , Mice , Mice, Knockout , Raclopride/administration & dosage , Receptors, Dopamine D1/antagonists & inhibitors , Receptors, Dopamine D1/metabolism , Receptors, Dopamine D2/metabolism , Reflex, Startle/drug effects , Sex Factors
4.
Brain Res ; 835(1): 27-36, 1999 Jul 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10448193

ABSTRACT

Assessing locomotor behavior is a standard methodology to characterize the behavioral phenotype of a genetic manipulation. Typically, levels of locomotor activity are measured using various methods that are based on the frequency of photobeam breaks or distance traveled as assessed by video-tracking systems. Locomotor behavior, however, is multi-dimensional and reflects the combined influences of multiple processes. Here, we examine the number of independent dimensions of locomotor behavior in mice based on measures derived from a video-tracking system. In addition, we test the hypothesis that locomotor behavior varies substantially across mouse strains. 84 mice were tested for 30 min in a 41 x 41 cm enclosure. Based on previous investigations in rats, we also assessed the spatial and dynamical aspects of locomotor behavior using the spatial scaling exponent, d, and the dynamical entropy, h. A principal component analysis and a one-way repeated measure ANOVA were conducted. C57 mouse strains differ substantially from 129 mouse strains on almost all measures of locomotor behavior. The principal component analysis revealed that two independent factors influence this set of measures. The first factor reflects the amount or level of locomotor activity, the second factor quantifies the degree of spatial and dynamical organization of behavior. These strain differences and the existence of at least two independent dimensions when measuring locomotor behavior may help to parse the effects of gene manipulations relative to strain differences in mutant mice.


Subject(s)
Behavior, Animal/physiology , Motor Activity/genetics , Motor Activity/physiology , Algorithms , Animals , Entropy , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Inbred Strains , Mutation/physiology , Pattern Recognition, Visual/physiology , Species Specificity
5.
J Neurosci ; 19(11): 4627-33, 1999 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10341260

ABSTRACT

Brain dopamine (DA) systems are involved in the modulation of the sensorimotor gating phenomenon known as prepulse inhibition (PPI). The class of D2-like receptors, including the D2, D3, and D4 receptor subtypes, have all been implicated in the control of PPI via studies of DA agonists and antagonists in rats. Nevertheless, the functional relevance of each receptor subtype remains unclear because these ligands are not specific. To determine the relevance of each receptor subtype, we used genetically altered strains of "knock-out" mice lacking the DA D2, D3, or D4 receptors. We tested the effects of each knock-out on both the phenotypic expression of PPI and the disruption of PPI produced by the indirect DA agonist d-amphetamine (AMPH). No phenotypic differences in PPI were observed at baseline. AMPH significantly disrupted PPI in the D2 (+/+) mice but had no effect in the D2 (-/-) mice. After AMPH treatment, both DA D3 and D4 receptor (+/+) and (-/-) mice had significant disruptions in PPI. These findings indicate that the AMPH-induced disruption of PPI is mediated via the DA D2 receptor and not the D3 or D4 receptor subtypes. Uncovering the neural mechanisms involved in PPI will further our understanding of the substrates of sensorimotor gating and could lead to better therapeutics to treat gating disorders, such as schizophrenia.


Subject(s)
Amphetamine/pharmacology , Dopamine Agents/pharmacology , Neural Inhibition/drug effects , Receptors, Dopamine/drug effects , Acoustic Stimulation , Animals , Mice , Mice, Knockout , Mice, Mutant Strains , Receptors, Dopamine D2/drug effects , Receptors, Dopamine D3 , Receptors, Dopamine D4 , Reflex, Startle/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...