Risk Factors for COVID-19 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A National, ENEIDA-Based Case-Control Study (COVID-19-EII).

(1) Scant information is available concerning the characteristics that may favour the acquisition of COVID-19 in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess these differences between infected and noninfected patients with IBD. (2) This nationwide case−control study evaluated patients with inflammatory bowel disease with COVID-19 (cases) and without COVID-19 (controls) during the period March−July 2020 included in the ENEIDA of GETECCU. (3) A total of 496 cases and 964 controls from 73 Spanish centres were included. No differences were found in the basal characteristics between cases and controls. Cases had higher comorbidity Charlson scores (24% vs. 19%; p = 0.02) and occupational risk (28% vs. 10.5%; p < 0.0001) more frequently than did controls. Lockdown was the only protective measure against COVID-19 (50% vs. 70%; p < 0.0001). No differences were found in the use of systemic steroids, immunosuppressants or biologics between cases and controls. Cases were more often treated with 5-aminosalicylates (42% vs. 34%; p = 0.003). Having a moderate Charlson score (OR: 2.7; 95%CI: 1.3−5.9), occupational risk (OR: 2.9; 95%CI: 1.8−4.4) and the use of 5-aminosalicylates (OR: 1.7; 95%CI: 1.2−2.5) were factors for COVID-19. The strict lockdown was the only protective factor (OR: 0.1; 95%CI: 0.09−0.2). (4) Comorbidities and occupational exposure are the most relevant factors for COVID-19 in patients with IBD. The risk of COVID-19 seems not to be increased by immunosuppressants or biologics, with a potential effect of 5-aminosalicylates, which should be investigated further and interpreted with caution.

Nationwide COVID-19-EII Study: Incidence, Environmental Risk Factors and Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease and COVID-19 of the ENEIDA Registry.

We aim to describe the incidence and source of contagion of COVID-19 in patients with IBD, as well as the risk factors for a severe course and long-term sequelae. This is a prospective observational study of IBD and COVID-19 included in the ENEIDA registry (53,682 from 73 centres) between March-July 2020 followed-up for 12 months. Results were compared with data of the general population (National Centre of Epidemiology and Catalonia). A total of 482 patients with COVID-19 were identified. Twenty-eight percent were infected in the work environment, and 48% were infected by intrafamilial transmission, despite having good adherence to lockdown. Thirty-five percent required hospitalization, 7.9% had severe COVID-19 and 3.7% died. Similar data were reported in the general population (hospitalisation 19.5%, ICU 2.1% and mortality 4.6%). Factors related to death and severe COVID-19 were being aged ≥ 60 years (OR 7.1, 95% CI: 1.8-27 and 4.5, 95% CI: 1.3-15.9), while having ≥2 comorbidities increased mortality (OR 3.9, 95% CI: 1.3-11.6). None of the drugs for IBD were related to severe COVID-19. Immunosuppression was definitively stopped in 1% of patients at 12 months. The prognosis of COVID-19 in IBD, even in immunosuppressed patients, is similar to that in the general population. Thus, there is no need for more strict protection measures in IBD.

Emphysematous pancreatitis: a rare entity with characteristic radiological findings.

The case was a 53-year-old male with a history of acute pancreatitis of biliary origin, and subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, currently hospitalized due to a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. Seventy-two hours after the onset of symptoms he had fever, uncontrolled pain, and elevated inflammatory markers. An abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan revealed an aerial collection at the pancreatic gland suggestive of emphysematous pancreatitis. Proteus vulgaris was isolated from pancreatic puncture and blood cultures. The patient developed septic shock, which required admission to the intensive care unit. Septic shock was initially controlled by percutaneous drainage. However, surgical debridement was also necessary in the following days.

Valoración del sobrecrecimiento y traslocación bacterianos en el hígado graso no alcohólico, en pacientes con obesidad mórbida / An assessment of bacterial overgrowth and translocation in the non-alcoholic fatty liver of patients with morbid obesity

Antecedentes: se ha propuesto que el sobrecrecimiento bacteriano del intestino delgado (SBID) y la traslocación bacteriana a través de la pared intestinal se relacionan con el hígado graso no alcohólico (HGNA). El objetivo del presente estudio ha sido estudiar dicha relación en obesos mórbidos. Pacientes y métodos: se incluyeron consecutivamente pacientes con obesidad mórbida previo a su intervención de cirugía bariátrica. Los criterios de exclusión fueron: biopsia hepática normal, otras causas de enfermedad hepática o atrofia de la mucosa duodenal. Se realizó una gastroscopia para cultivo del aspirado duodenal, biopsias duodenales y extracción de sangre venosa periférica para estudio de lipopolisacárido (LPS) y proteína de unión del LPS (LBP). La biopsia hepática se realizó durante la intervención quirúrgica. Resultados: se incluyeron 71 pacientes; 26 fueron excluidos por biopsia hepática normal. Cuarenta y cinco tenían HGNA. Dieciocho eran varones, con edad media de 45,8 años (22-69) e índice de masa corporal (IMC) de 47,8 kg/m2 (37-58); el 25% tuvo SBID en el cultivo del aspirado duodenal. Existió significación estadística entre niveles de LBP y SBID con el grado de esteatosis (p < 0,05 y p = 0,077, respectivamente). No existió relación estadística con el índice de esteatohepatitis no alcohólica (EHNA), aunque sí hubo una tendencia a su asociación. Los niveles de LPS no guardaron relación con el grado de esteatosis o el índice de EHNA. Conclusiones: en pacientes con obesidad mórbida e HGNA se observan mayores niveles circulantes de LBP y mayor frecuencia de SBID cuanto mayor es el grado de esteatosis hepática

Background: small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) and bacterial translocation across the intestinal wall have been allegedly associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL). Our goal was to study such alleged association in morbidly obese patients. Patients and methods: patients with morbid obesity were consecutively included prior to bariatric surgery. Exclusion criteria included normal liver biopsy, other causes of liver disease, and duodenal mucosal atrophy. A gastroscopy was performed for duodenal aspirate culture and duodenal biopsy, and peripheral venous blood was drawn to assess lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and LPS-binding protein (LBP) levels. A liver biopsy was carried out during surgery. Results: seventy-one patients were included; 26 were excluded because of normal liver biopsy. Forty-five had NAFL. Eighteen were male, mean age was 45.8 years (22-69), and BMI was 47.8 kg/m2 (37-58). A total of 25% had SIBO in their duodenal aspirate culture. There was statistical significance for the association of LBP levels and SIBO with steatosis grade (p < 0.05 and p = 0.077, respectively). There was no statistical association with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) index, but a trend towards association was found. LPS levels were not associated with steatosis grade or NASH index. Conclusions: the higher the grade of liver steatosis, the higher were the circulating LBP levels and SIBO rates seen in patients with morbid obesity and NAFL

An assessment of bacterial overgrowth and translocation in the non-alcoholic fatty liver of patients with morbid obesity.

BACKGROUND: small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) and bacterial translocation across the intestinal wall have been allegedly associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL). Our goal was to study such alleged association in morbidly obese patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: patients with morbid obesity were consecutively included prior to bariatric surgery. Exclusion criteria included normal liver biopsy, other causes of liver disease, and duodenal mucosal atrophy. A gastroscopy was performed for duodenal aspirate culture and duodenal biopsy, and peripheral venous blood was drawn to assess lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and LPS-binding protein (LBP) levels. A liver biopsy was carried out during surgery. RESULTS: seventy-one patients were included; 26 were excluded because of normal liver biopsy. Forty-five had NAFL. Eighteen were male, mean age was 45.8 years (22-69), and BMI was 47.8 kg/m2 (37-58). A total of 25% had SIBO in their duodenal aspirate culture. There was statistical significance for the association of LBP levels and SIBO with steatosis grade (p < 0.05 and p = 0.077, respectively). There was no statistical association with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) index, but a trend towards association was found. LPS levels were not associated with steatosis grade or NASH index. CONCLUSIONS: the higher the grade of liver steatosis, the higher were the circulating LBP levels and SIBO rates seen in patients with morbid obesity and NAFL.