ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The main limitation of the six-minute walk test (6-MWT) is that not all pulmonary function testing facilities have an indoor flat, 30-m-long corridor. Therefore, this study aimed 1) to evaluate the correlation and agreement of the distances walked in 30-m- vs. 15-m-long corridors by subjects with chronic lung diseases (CLD group) and 2) to compare the levels of oxygen saturation (nSpO2), blood pressure (BP), heart rate recovery at minute one post-exercise (HRR1), and Borg scale scores for dyspnea and fatigue between the two distances walked. METHODS: A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted at the National Institute of Respiratory Diseases in Mexico City. Subjects with chronic lung diseases and healthy adults were invited to participate. The distance of the 6-MWT was randomly assigned based on whether the first test was in the 15-m or 30-m corridor. RESULTS: Ninety individuals were included; the correlation in meters walked between the two corridors was r = 0.96 in CLD; the 95% limits of agreement for the 6-MWT ranged from -73 to +37 m. Most subjects walked further in the 30-m corridor (82%); however, the percent predicted values for the CLD group were 3.5% lower for the 15-m corridor than the 30-m corridor. Only 10.5% of the subjects with CLD would have been falsely classified as having a normal 6-MWT (false negative). No significant differences in the nSpO2, Borg scale, BP or HRR1 were found between the two 6-MWT corridor lengths. CONCLUSION: The 6-MWT can be performed using a 15-m corridor in subjects with CLD, and the results for the distance walked, HRR1, nSpO2, and Borg scale scores are similar to between the 15-m and 30-m corridors.
