Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 80: 392.e1-392.e6, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34775015

ABSTRACT

Ergotism is an uncommon condition that affects patients with exposure to ergot alkaloids causing ischemia of extremities. We report the case of lower extremities ischemia caused by ergot toxicity in a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive individual due to the interaction between ergot alkaloid and Cobicistat. In addition, we present a brief review of medical, and pharmacological aspects of this condition. To our knowledge, this is the second reported case describing this interaction.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Agonists/adverse effects , Anti-HIV Agents/adverse effects , Cobicistat/adverse effects , Ergotamine/adverse effects , Ergotism/diagnosis , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Ischemia/chemically induced , Lower Extremity/blood supply , Drug Interactions , Ergotism/etiology , HIV Infections/complications , Humans , Male , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Young Adult
2.
BMJ Case Rep ; 14(5)2021 May 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33975838

ABSTRACT

Testicular ischaemia after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a very uncommon complication. There are only a few cases reported in the literature and the pathogenesis remains unclear. We report a case of unilateral testicular ischaemia in the early postoperative period after EVAR.A 78-year-old man underwent standard EVAR without immediate complications. Twenty-four hours after the procedure, the patient developed sudden onset of right scrotal pain and a low-grade fever. Urgent testicular ultrasound showed ischaemic signs compromising 75% of the testicle. The patient was successfully managed with conservative treatment.Although the pathogenesis is unknown, acute thrombosis of the testicle feeding arteries is postulated as the main hypothesis in the physiopathogenesis.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Aged , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Humans , Ischemia/etiology , Male , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Testis/diagnostic imaging , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) ; 58(6): 801-813, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28128541

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many patients with complex abdominal aortic aneurysms are unfit for open repair. New endovascular technologies and bailout techniques are being used for managing these complex anatomies. The purpose of this study is to compare the results obtained with advanced endovascular aneurysm repair (a-EVAR) techniques (fenestrated and chimney endografts) to those obtained with open repair for the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms not anatomically suitable for standard endovascular exclusion (infrarenal neck <10 mm, juxtarenal, suprarenal and Crawford's type IV thoracoabdominal aneurysms). METHODS: All patients that underwent open surgery (OS cohort; historical, January 1994-December 2015) or a-EVAR (a-EVAR cohort; prospective, January 2006-December 2015) at our institution for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms that meet the anatomical criteria described above on the preoperatory contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan were included. Vascular Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (V-POSSUM) was employed for risk-assessment. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were included, all of them male: 56 in the OS cohort and 52 in the a-EVAR cohort (mean age: 67.5±6.7 vs. 72.65±6.4 years, respectively; P=0.000). V-POSSUM predicted 4 deaths for the OS cohort and 3 deaths for the a-EVAR cohorts within the postoperative period and morbidity rates of 57% and a 44.4%, respectively. All-cause 30-day mortality rates were 9 patients (16%) for the OS cohort and 2 patients (3.8%) for the a-EVAR cohort (P=0.038). Thirty-day morbidity rates were 59% for the OS cohort and 44% for the a-EVAR cohort (P=0.09). Mean cost of treatment was € 15,707 per patient for the OS cohort (median: € 11,516; inter-quartilic range [IQR]: € 7901; min-max: € 5069-11,0052) and € 33,457 per patient for the a-EVAR cohort (median: € 29,663; IQR: € 5979; min-max: € 13,865-19,3536), P=0.000. CONCLUSIONS: A-EVAR is a feasible alternative to open surgery for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms at our institution, with lower 30-day mortality rates, yet increasing double the amount the total cost of the therapy.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/economics , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/mortality , Aortography/methods , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/economics , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Computed Tomography Angiography , Cost Savings , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Databases, Factual , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/economics , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Feasibility Studies , Female , Health Care Costs , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Economic , Prosthesis Design , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL