Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Med. intensiva (Madr., Ed. impr.) ; 37(8): 503-509, nov. 2013. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-121382

ABSTRACT

Objetivo Analizar la legibilidad de los documentos de consentimiento informado (CI) utilizados en una unidad de cuidados intensivos y en el Sistema Andaluz de Salud (SAS).Diseño Estudio descriptivo. Ámbito Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos de un hospital terciario y Sistema Andaluz de Salud. Intervenciones Revisión y análisis de los 14 modelos de CI existentes en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos y otros 14 modelos de CI ofertados por el Servicio Andaluz de Salud, usando los siguientes índices de legibilidad: Flesch, Complejidad oracional, LEGIN, Fernández-Huerta, Szigriszt e INFLESZ. Resultados Veinticuatro consentimientos (85,7%) no cumplen alguno de los índices y 3 (10,7%) no cumplen ninguno. Hay 4 documentos (14,3%) que cumplen todos los índices analizados y, por tanto, resultan fáciles de comprender. El Índice de Flesch: se cumple en uno de los consentimientos del Hospital (7,1%) y 3 del SAS (21,4%). Índice de Complejidad oracional: se cumple en 11 de los consentimientos del hospital (78,6%) y en 13 del SAS (92,8%). Índice de Fernández-Huerta: se cumple en 4 consentimientos del hospital (28,6%) y en 13 del SAS (92,8%). Índice de Szigriszt: se cumple en 2 consentimientos del Hospital (14,3%) y en 11 de los del SAS (64,3%). Índice de INFLESZ: se cumple en 2 CI del hospital (14,3%) y en 10 del SAS (71,4%).Conclusiones Los documentos analizados resultan, en general, difíciles de leer y de comprender para el ciudadano medio, no cumpliendo el objetivo básico para el que fueron redactados (AU)


Objective To analyze the readability of informed consent documents (IC) used in an intensive care department and in the Andalusian Healthcare System (AHS).Design A descriptive study was carried out. Scope The Intensive Care Unit of a tertiary Hospital, and the AHS.Interventions A review and analysis was made of the existing 14 IC models in the Intensive Care Unit and of another 14 IC models offered by the AHS, using the following readability scores: Flesch, Sentence complexity, LEGIN, Fernández-Huerta, Szigriszt and INFLESZ. Results Twenty-four IC (85.7%) failed to satisfy some of the indexes, while three (10.7%) did not satisfy any of them. Four documents (14.3%) satisfied all the indexes analyzed, and therefore are easy to understand. Flesch score: satisfied by one of the ICU IC (7.1%) and by three of the AHS documents (21.4%). Sentence complexity score: satisfied by 11 of the ICU IC (78.6%) and by 13 of the AHS documents (92.8%). Fernández-Huerta score: satisfied by four of the ICU IC (28.6%) and by 13 of the AHS documents (92.8%). Szigriszt score: satisfied by two of the ICU IC (14.3%) and by 11 of the AHS documents (64.3%). INFLESZ score: satisfied by two of the ICU IC (14.3%) and by 10 of the AHS documents (71.4%).Conclusions The documents analyzed are generally difficult to read and understand by most people, and do not satisfy the basic purpose for which they were drafted (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Critical Care/methods , Informed Consent/statistics & numerical data , Comprehension , Forms and Records Control , Physician-Patient Relations
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...