Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Pediatr. aten. prim ; 16(64): e161-e172, oct.-dic. 2014. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-133930

ABSTRACT

La publicación en EE. UU. de la guía de 2013 de American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association para el tratamiento del colesterol elevado ha tenido gran impacto por el cambio de paradigma que supone. El Comité Español Interdisciplinario de Prevención Cardiovascular y la Sociedad Española de Cardiología han revisado esa guía, en comparación con la vigente guía europea de prevención cardiovascular y de dislipemias. El aspecto más destacable de la guía estadounidense es el abandono de los objetivos de colesterol unido a lipoproteínas de baja densidad, de modo que proponen el tratamiento con estatinas en cuatro grupos de riesgo aumentado. En pacientes con enfermedad cardiovascular establecida, ambas guías conducen a una estrategia terapéutica similar (estatinas potentes, dosis altas). Sin embargo, en prevención primaria, la aplicación de la guía estadounidense supondría tratar con estatinas a un número de personas excesivo, particularmente de edades avanzadas. Abandonar la estrategia según objetivos de colesterol, fuertemente arraigada en la comunidad científica, podría tener un impacto negativo en la práctica clínica y crear cierta confusión e inseguridad entre los profesionales y quizá menos seguimiento y adherencia de los pacientes. Por todo ello, el presente documento reafirma las recomendaciones de la guía europea. Ambas guías tienen aspectos positivos pero, en general y mientras no se resuelvan las dudas planteadas, la guía europea, además de utilizar tablas basadas en la población autóctona, ofrece mensajes más apropiados para el entorno español y previene del posible riesgo de sobretratamiento con estatinas en prevención primaria (AU)


The publication of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines on the treatment of high blood cholesterol has had a strong impact due to the paradigm shift in its recommendations. The Spanish Interdisciplinary Committee for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and the Spanish Society of Cardiology reviewed this guideline and compared it with current European guidelines on cardiovascular prevention and dyslipidemia management. The most striking aspect of the American guideline is the elimination of the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol treat-to-target strategy and the adoption of a risk reduction strategy in 4 major statin benefit groups. In patients with established cardiovascular disease, both guidelines recommend a similar therapeutic strategy (high-dose potent statins). However, in primary prevention, the application of the American guidelines would substantially increase the number of persons, particularly older people, receiving statin therapy. The elimination of the cholesterol treat-to-target strategy, so strongly rooted in the scientific community, could have a negative impact on clinical practice, create a certain amount of confusion and uncertainty among professionals, and decrease follow-up and patient adherence. Thus, this article reaffirms the recommendations of the European guidelines. Although both guidelines have positive aspects, doubt remains regarding the concerns outlined above. In addition to using risk charts based on the native population, the messages of the European guideline are more appropriate to the Spanish setting and avoid the possible risk of overtreatment with statins in primary prevention (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , 35145 , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./legislation & jurisprudence , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/metabolism , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Primary Prevention/methods , Spain/ethnology , United States/ethnology , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./history , Cardiovascular Diseases/complications , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Consensus , Primary Prevention/instrumentation
2.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 116(18): 686-91, 2001 May 19.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11412679

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We analyse the characteristics of the patients with diabetes and cardiac disease included in the CARDIOTENS 1999 study. PATIENTS AND METHOD: 32,051 outpatients who were seen the same day by 1,159 primary healthcare physicians (79%) and cardiologists (21%) were prospectively registered in a database including demographic and clinical data and therapeutic profile. RESULTS: History of cardiac disease was present in 19% (6,194 patients) of the whole population, and 1,275 of them (20.6%) were diabetics. Hypertension was present in 74% of diabetic patients with cardiac disease. Coronary heart disease (angina pectoris or previous myocardial infarction) was present in 45% of diabetic patients with heart failure. Less than 30% of these patients had blood pressure levels under 130/85 mmHg, as recommended by international guidelines. An LDL-cholesterol level lower than 100 mgrs/dl was observed in only 12% of diabetic patients with coronary heart disease; the mean values of total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol of these patients were significantly (p < 0.01) higher in those seen by primary healthcare physicians. Less than 40% of diabetic patients with cardiac disease were treated with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, a therapy which was otherwise used in 50% of diabetic patients with heart failure. A beta-blocker therapy was used in 26% of diabetic patients with coronary heart disease and 39% of them were being treated with statins. CONCLUSIONS: More than 20% of patients with cardiac disease in this study were diabetics. Blood pressure and cholesterol levels recommended by current guidelines were attained in a limited proportion of these patients. The use of drugs with demonstrated prognostic benefit in diabetic patients with heart disease is scarce.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Complications , Heart Diseases/etiology , Aged , Cardiology/statistics & numerical data , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Female , Heart Diseases/epidemiology , Heart Diseases/therapy , Humans , Male , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Spain
3.
Rev Esp Cardiol ; 52 Suppl 3: 73-8, 1999.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10614152

ABSTRACT

We review the different cardiovascular effects exerted by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, obtained in several experimental and clinical studies in the last twenty years, in patients with arterial hypertension and different cardiovascular pathologies related to the hypertensive process. We will review the mechanistic basis of the cardiovascular protective effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition. These drugs, as monotherapy or combined therapy, can achieve blood pressure control in a high proportion of hypertensive patients; in hypertensive patients with diabetes these drugs are especially indicated, and also are the drugs of choice in diabetic hypertensive patients with cardiac dysfunction due to ischaemic cardiomyopathy. This group of drugs has the highest effect among the drugs available today in reducing left ventricular hypertrophy associated with the hypertensive process. There are many experimental and clinical data that suggest the potential role of the angiotensin converting enzyme antagonists limiting the atherosclerotic process.


Subject(s)
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Hypertension/drug therapy , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacology , Arteriosclerosis/prevention & control , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Cardiovascular System/drug effects , Clinical Trials as Topic , Diabetes Complications , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Failure/etiology , Heart Failure/prevention & control , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/prevention & control , Myocardial Infarction/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...