Intragraft gene and protein expression in rat liver allografts treated with costimulatory blockade alone or in combination with CyA.

BACKGROUND: Costimulatory blockade has been shown to prevent acute rejection (AR) and promote long-term graft survival in a number of animal models including nonhuman primates. The effect of concomitant administration of conventional immunosuppressives on long-term liver allograft survival and intragraft expression of immune mediators has not previously been examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A high-responding Dark Agouti to Lewis orthotopic liver transplant (LEW OLT) model was used to compare anti-CD154 alone, or in combination with cyclosporin (CyA) on allograft survival. Donor-specific reactivity was assessed by mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) and allogeneic skin grafts. Surviving rats were euthanized on day 150 and intragraft gene (CD80, 86, 152, 154, IFN-gamma, IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, IL-13, TNF-alpha, TGF-beta, IL-7, Fas-ligand, Granzyme B, bax, and bcl(2)) and protein (CD4, CD8, ED1, CD154, CD80, CD86) expression was measured. RESULTS: Untreated control recipients had a median survival time of 5 days. Recipients treated with anti-CD154 survived to beyond 150 days with no evidence of AR. Concomitant administration of CyA did not alter the long-term survival. There was no difference in the serum aspartate aminotransferase between treatment groups or a change over time. All treated recipients showed a reduction in donor-specific MLR at day 40 and 60 but had persistence of donor reactivity to skin grafts at day 100. Histologically, liver architecture was well preserved despite the presence of a nondestructive mononuclear cell infiltrate. Analysis of intragraft gene expression revealed an inverse relationship between the duration of anti-CD154 therapy and the gene expression of costimulatory molecules and Th1 cytokine transcripts. The pro-apoptotic gene, bax, was increased in recipients treated with anti-CD154, but not CyA, compared with normal liver. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that anti-CD154 therapy either alone or in combination with CyA allows for the long-term survival of liver allografts in the rat despite there being a difference in the intragraft gene and protein profile.

The natural history of acute histologic rejection without biochemical graft dysfunction in orthotopic liver transplantation: a systematic review.

Protocol biopsy results in the first few weeks after liver transplantation sometimes display histologic features of acute cellular rejection (ACR), even in the absence of significant clinical or biochemical dysfunction. At present there is no clear consensus about the need to treat such cases with adjuvant immunosuppression. This systematic review describes, from the available evidence, the natural history of untreated histologic ACR in the absence of biochemical graft dysfunction. An electronic search of the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to select studies that reported protocol liver biopsies in the early posttransplant period from 1983 to 2000. Studies that identified patients with ACR on protocol biopsy who were not treated with adjuvant immunosuppression formed the basis of the study group. Data from individual studies were extracted using standardized pro forma and pooled for descriptive analysis. The search identified 3431 studies, of which 516 were cited in full. Of these, 15 studies met all of the inclusion criteria. These 15 studies reported on 1566 patients who had protocol biopsies performed in the early posttransplant period, of which 1048 (67%) had histologic evidence of ACR. Three hundred and thirty one (32%) patients with histologic ACR on protocol biopsy had no associated biochemical graft dysfunction. Without treatment, only 14% of these patients subsequently developed biochemical graft dysfunction requiring adjuvant immunosuppression. Steroid-resistant rejection and chronic rejection both had a prevalence of 4% in patients with untreated histologic ACR and no biochemical graft dysfunction. Withholding adjuvant immunosuppression from patients with histologic ACR and no biochemical graft dysfunction seems to be safe, as long as graft function is carefully monitored. The rationale for performing protocol biopsies in the absence of biochemical graft dysfunction is questionable.