ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Motor- (MEP) and somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP) are susceptible to the effects of intraoperative environmental factors. METHODS: Over a 5-year period, 250 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who underwent corrective surgery with IOM were retrospectively analyzed for MEP suppression (MEPS). RESULTS: Our results show that four distinct groups of MEPS were encountered over the study period. All 12 patients did not sustain any neurological deficits postoperatively. However, comparison of groups 1 and 2 suggests that neither the duration of anesthesia nor speed of surgical or anesthetic intervention were associated with recovery to a level beyond the criteria for MEPS. For group 3, spontaneous MEPS recovery despite the lack of surgical intervention suggests that anesthetic intervention may play a role in this process. However, spontaneous MEPS recovery was also seen in group 4, suggesting that in certain circumstances, both surgical and anesthetic intervention was not required. In addition, neither the duration of time to the first surgical manoeuver nor the duration of surgical manoeuver to MEPS were related to recovery of MEPS. None of the patients had suppression of SSEPs intraoperatively. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that in susceptible individuals, MEPS may rarely occur unpredictably, independent of surgical or anesthetic intervention. However, our findings favor anesthetic before surgical intervention as a proposed protocol. Early recognition of MEPS is important to prevent false positives in the course of IOM for spinal surgery.
ABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized study in a large general hospital setting. BACKGROUND: During spinal surgery, monitoring motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) is a means of assessing the intraoperative integrity of corticospinal pathways. However, MEPs are known to be sensitive to the effects of anesthetic agents. OBJECTIVE: To compare the use of desflurane or total intravenous anesthetic regimens (TIVA) with multipulse cortical stimulation for intraoperative monitoring (IOM). METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients (10 in each arm) undergoing scoliosis correction surgery were randomly assigned to 2 equal groups receiving desflurane or TIVA. Inhalational anesthesia was maintained using 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen and a mean end-tidal desflurane concentration of 3.4%. For TIVA, continuous intravenous infusion of propofol was used. For analgesia, fentanyl and morphine were given when required for both groups. Cortical stimulation was achieved with 2 bipolar direct current stimulators connected in parallel by jumper cables. Five equivalent pulses 0.5 ms in duration at 4 ms intervals were delivered at C1C2 positions. MEP recordings were made in the abductor hallucis (AH) and tibialis anterior (TA) with needle electrodes. RESULTS: Reproducible MEPs were obtained throughout the operation in all 20 cases, with up to 80 mA per stimulator. Before insertion of pedicle screws, mean MEP amplitudes (SD) obtained were 85 (19) and 21.7 (10.8) mV for AH and TA, respectively, using desflurane. With TIVA, amplitudes were 56.7 (28.4) and 59.1 (24.5) mV, respectively. Both muscle MEP amplitudes were significantly different using different anesthetic regimens (P < 0.05 for all). AH MEP amplitudes obtained with desflurane were significantly larger than TA amplitudes (P < 0.0001). No complications were reported intraoperatively and postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study comparing the use of desflurane and TIVA showing that both anesthetic regimens allowed successful intraoperative monitoring useage throughout the procedures. For MEP recording, the AH was the preferred muscle with a desflurane anesthetic regimen.
