Intelligence quotient testing in children with hearing loss: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the current study is to perform a systematic review of the research literature to evaluate the impact of hearing loss on intelligence quotient (IQ) scores in pediatric patients. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were searched from their inception up to December 21st, 2021. REVIEW METHODS: Studies evaluating neurocognitive testing and hearing loss in children aged 21 years old or younger who had not undergone auditory rehabilitation were included in the study. Two independent reviewers evaluated titles, abstracts, and full texts for all included studies. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 3199 studies of which 431 studies underwent full-text screening. 21 studies were ultimately selected for inclusion and contained a total of 1716 pediatric patients assessed through 13 different validated tests of intelligence. Six studies included both hearing impaired (HI) and normal hearing (NH) patients, and IQ testing results. CONCLUSION: The results of this large systematic review demonstrate that hearing impaired children may perform lower than their age-matched normal hearing peers on IQ testing across a battery of IQ testing modalities.

Association of Discharge Location Following Pediatric Tracheostomy with Social Determinants of Health: A National Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the breakdown of discharge locations among pediatric tracheostomy patients and determine the impact of demographic variables and social determinants of health. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of the 2016 and 2019 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Kids' Inpatient Database (HCUP KID). SETTING: A total of 4000 United States community hospitals, defined as short-term, non-Federal, general, and specialty hospitals. METHODS: ICD-10-PCS, ICD-10 CM codes, and HCUP data elements were selected for patients and variables of interest. Bivariate comparisons were performed using Rao-Scott Chi-square tests; significance levels in post hoc pairwise testing were adjusted using Bonferroni adjustment. Multinomial generalized logistic regression models were used to determine the average annual odds ratio (OR) of 3 dispositions at discharge relative to discharge home for self-care. RESULTS: Patients aged 11-17, patients from large metropolitan areas, and patients of "Other" race have an increased odds of discharge to a short- or long-term care facility (all P < .001). Weekend admissions, nonelective admissions, patients in Northeast hospitals, and patients at urban nonteaching hospitals are also more likely to be discharged to a short- or long-term care facility (all P < .001). Mean and median total costs of admission were $424,387 and $243,479, respectively, with a median total charge of $854,499. CONCLUSION: Among pediatric tracheostomy patients, demographic factors that affect discharge disposition include age, community type, and race, and significant hospital factors include day and type of admission, geographic region, and hospital type. Hospitalizations are associated with high overall costs and charges to the patient, which are increasing over time.

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children with hearing loss.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate rates of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (AD/HD) diagnosis among pediatric patients with normal hearing (NH) and hearing loss (HL) with and without comorbidities. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of NH and HL patients following chart review of all pediatric patients with a history of tympanostomy tube placement treated at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation between 2019 and 2022. METHODS: Patient demographic information, hearing status (type of HL, laterality, severity), and comorbidities including prematurity, genetic syndromes, disorders with neurological impairment, and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) were collected. Rate of AD/HD amongst HL and NH cohorts with and without comorbidities were compared using Fisher's exact test. Covariate-adjusted analysis was also completed (sex, current age, age at tube placement, and OSA). The primary outcome of interest was rates of AD/HD among children with NH and HL, and the secondary outcome of interest was the impact of comorbidities on rates of AD/HD diagnosis in these cohorts. RESULTS: Of the 919 screened patients between 2019 and 2022, there were 778 NH patients and 141 HL patients (80 bilateral, 61 unilateral). HL ranged from mild (n = 110) to moderate (n = 21) to severe/profound (n = 9). Overall, the rate of AD/HD was significantly higher in HL children (12.1% HL vs 3.6% NH, p < 0.001). Of the 919 patients, 157 had comorbidities. In children without comorbidities, HL children still had significantly higher rates of AD/HD compared to NH children (8.0% vs 1.9%, p = 0.02), but there was loss of significance after covariate adjustment (p = 0.72). CONCLUSION: The rate of AD/HD among children with HL (12.1%) is higher than the rate of AD/HD in NH children (3.6%), consistent with previous findings. After excluding patients with comorbidities and adjusting for covariates, there are similar rates of AD/HD between HL and NH patients. Given high rates of comorbidities and AD/HD in HL patients and potential for augmented developmental challenges, clinicians should have a low threshold to refer children with HL for neurocognitive testing, particularly those with any of the comorbidities or covariates described in this study.

Refractory tympanostomy tube otorrhea: Outcomes with otowick placement.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate rates of resolution of and antibiotic use in refractory otorrhea (otorrhea ≥2 weeks with no more than 2 days of otorrhea resolution during the episode) with otowick placement in comparison to medical therapy and tube removals with or without replacements. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients with a history of tympanostomy tube placement and refractory otorrhea between 2017 and 2022. SETTING: Cleveland Clinic Foundation (CCF) pediatric otolaryngology group. METHODS: Demographic data (sex, race, and age at tympanostomy tube placement) were collected. Outcome measures included number of oral and topical antibiotic treatments, duration of otorrhea episode, and resolution of otorrhea at 1 and 3 months follow-up. Wilcoxon rank sum and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare number of antibiotics treatments. An ANOVA test and linear regression model using log-transformed data were used to compare duration of otorrhea. Fisher's exact test was used to compare rates of otorrhea recurrence. RESULTS: 70 patients met inclusion criteria: 37 male (52.9%), 33 female (47.1%), with an average age at tube placement of 29.66 months. There was a statistically significant decrease in total duration of otorrhea (in days) with otowicks (17.29 ± 13.13), compared to patients receiving medical therapy (27.09 ± 22.02) and tube removals and replacements (29.63 ± 19.95) (p = 0.025). There was no significant difference between the follow-up rates of resolution at 1 month (p = 1) and 3 months (p = 0.12). CONCLUSION: Otowick use is associated with shorter duration of otorrhea and can be considered as a first-line treatment for refractory otorrhea. Otowicks and medical therapy alone can reduce need for tube removals and the associated risk of anesthesia.

Examining research productivity in medical school and dermatology residency: a cross-sectional study.

Research productivity is one criterion used by residency programs to evaluate the academic qualifications of prospective applicants. Our objective was to examine individuals' research productivity in dermatology residency compared to medical school. A cohort of dermatology residents who graduated from an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) certified Dermatology program in 2019 or 2020. An author search was conducted to identify author publications. Author number, journal name, impact factor, study type, and publication date were collected. Publications were characterized as pre-residency publications (PRPs) if published during intern year, medical school graduating year, or the year before graduating year. Publications were residency publications (RPs) if published during residency. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the average number of PRPs and RPs between individuals. Secondary outcomes were compared using chi-square and t-tests. 55159 publications were collected. There was no difference in mean number of PRPs and RPs. However, PRPs were more likely to be first author publications and RPs were more likely to be case reports. Both PRPs and RPs were generally published in the same journals. The differences in PRPs and RPs may stem from changes in mentorship/sponsorship roles during training. Our findings add to the literature on PRPs. Future research should examine continued trends of publications in residency and fellowship.

Speech and Language outcomes in Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder (ANSD) children managed with amplification.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate speech and language outcomes in children with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder (ANSD) without significant comorbidities who received hearing rehabilitation in the form of hearing aids and/or cochlear implantation. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of pediatric ANSD patients at a large academic tertiary care institution from 2010 to 2019. Patients were included if they received a diagnosis of bilateral ANSD, had minimal to no comorbidities, and had speech and language testing (SLT) on at least two occasions. RESULTS: 51 patients were reviewed and 7 met inclusion criteria. Average age at ANSD diagnosis was 1 year and 11 months, and average age of hearing aid fitting was 3 years and 3 months. Hearing loss ranged from mild to profound, with four of the children wearing behind (BTE) hearing aids and three eventually receiving cochlear implants. Four of five patients who received hearing aids prior to their first speech and language evaluation demonstrated a delay at their initial evaluation, and all five patients continued to demonstrate a delay at their most recent evaluation, despite appropriate audiologic management and speech and language therapy. There were two patients who were unaided at the time of their initial and latest evaluations; one patient showed a delay at both timepoints, and one patient showed no speech delay at either timepoint. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric ANSD patients, who are otherwise typically developing and received hearing rehabilitation and speech and language therapy, continue to show a speech and language delay (SLD). This outcome underscores the importance of close monitoring of speech and language development, providing early amplification and/or cochlear implantation, and promoting additional education and psychosocial support.

Complex Eyelid Reconstruction: A Practical Guide for the Mohs Surgeon.

BACKGROUND: A growing body of literature suggests that Mohs micrographic surgeons can safely and successfully perform complex eyelid reconstruction. Given that up to 10 percent of all skin cancers occur on the periorbital skin, it is imperative that Mohs surgeons understand form and function to properly assess the defect and select the appropriate reconstruction method for a variety of eyelid defects. OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to provide a thorough understanding of eyelid anatomy with an emphasis on form and function, provide a framework for defect analysis, and an algorithmic approach to defect analysis and appropriate selection of repair. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A review of the literature on eyelid reconstruction was performed with specific reference to defect analysis and appropriately choosing repairs that are applicable to Mohs micrographic surgeons. CONCLUSION: Mohs micrographic surgeons can safely and successfully perform complex eyelid repairs. An understanding of eyelid anatomy is the first step toward the best surgical outcome, and there are various methods for reconstructing eyelid defects. Defect size, location and analysis of the anterior lamella, posterior lamella, and the canthal regions helps to create an organized operative plan.

Validated Outcome Measures and Postsurgical Scar Assessment Instruments in Auricular Surgery: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The utilization of an assessment instrument that successfully analyzes validated outcome measures for auricular surgery is important for advancing evidence-based medicine. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review postsurgical scar assessment instruments and outcome measures after auricular surgery to assess if any individual or combination of 2 assessment instruments encompass all relevant, validated auricular outcome measures. METHODS: Two systematic reviews were conducted using the PubMed/MEDLINE and Ovid databases: one for postauricular surgical outcome measures and another for postsurgical scar assessment instruments. Auricular outcome measure articles were selected for inclusion if they included at least one auricular-specific validated outcome measure, and assessment tool articles were included if they referenced one or more specific tool(s) specifically designed to assess postsurgical scars. Assessment tools were evaluated based on which outcome measures each covered. RESULTS: There was no single postsurgical scar assessment instrument or combination of 2 instruments that covered all outcome measures within the 5 different categories (psychosocial well-being, functional, objective appearance, subjective appearance, and clinical-related outcomes) after auricular surgery. None of the instruments measured functional outcomes, such as the ability to wear glasses and hearing outcomes. CONCLUSION: There is currently no existing postsurgical scar assessment instrument that covers all outcome measures after auricular surgery.

Validated Outcome Measures and Postsurgical Scar Assessment Instruments in Eyelid Surgery: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Determining which postsurgical scar assessment instruments, if any, cover important eyelid outcome measures can either attest to the strength of one or more instruments or reveal the need for a more comprehensive scale. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review validated outcome measures after eyelid surgery and postsurgical scar assessment tools to see whether any individual or combination of 2 assessment tools encompass all relevant, validated eyelid outcome measures. METHODS: Systematic reviews of validated eyelid outcome measures and postsurgical scar assessment tools were conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE and Ovid. Outcome measure papers that met inclusion criteria were sorted into 8 categories: Patient Subjective, Visual Function, Mechanical Function, Daily Activities, Adverse Effects, Aesthetic Quantitative: Clinical Measurements, Aesthetic Qualitative: Global, and Aesthetic Qualitative: Specific. Outcome measure papers were categorized into tiers of evidence support, and assessment tools were evaluated based on which outcome measures each covered. RESULTS: No one or combination of 2 assessment tools covered all selected eyelid outcome measures. Although measures related to the subjective patient experience were included in several of the assessment scales, none covered measures of visual function or eyelid-specific clinical measurements. CONCLUSION: There is currently no existing postsurgical scar assessment instrument that covers all important eyelid-specific outcome measures.