Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Diagn Res ; 11(1): VC05-VC07, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28274026

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Schizophrenia is a chronic mental disorder with disabling symptoms and variable outcome. Outcome is a multidimensional construct that depends on description of clinical and social domains. Symptomatic remission is one such clinical domain which can determine the outcome of illness. AIM: The study aimed to assess functional outcome in symptomatic remitted schizophrenia patients compared to unremitted patients in Indian population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted at the Institute of Mental Health, Chennai, India. Remitted (symptom free in preceding six months) and unremitted patients were assessed by Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS), Personal and Social Performance (PSP) scale, World Health Organization-Quality of Life BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). There were 30 patients in each group. All statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 20.0 statistical software. RESULTS: Patients in symptomatic remission were found to have better quality of life in personal, environmental and social domains (p<0.01). Their personal and social performance is significantly better in remission group. The overall functioning was assessed by GAF, was better in patients with symptomatic remission (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Symptomatic remission may be a good indicator of better clinical status, personal and social functioning and quality of life.

2.
Indian J Psychol Med ; 38(5): 431-437, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27833226

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Law governs the admission and management of involuntary admissions of mentally ill persons who are admitted under the provisions of the mental health act. The court directs the doctor to take charge of such persons. In the further dealings of such person the medical officer of the psychiatric facility comes across legal terms, which require understanding so that patients could be dealt with properly. Various terms such as accused, under police custody, judicial custody, remand prisoner, or under trial prisoner are used to denote their legal status. It is imperative for the medical officer to understand the nuances in the meanings of these terms. There are many times when the relevant section under which the admission is ordered is not found in the reception order. In these cases the terminology by which the patient is mentioned throws a light on the status of the patient. Towards this aim a study was carried out to assess the awareness and understanding of such terms by the faculty and post- graduates of a tertiary care hospital that deals with the admission and care of such patients. METHOD: They were administered a questionnaire containing these terms and asked to provide the meaning of these terms. RESULTS: The results showed that nearly half the faculty and students were not having clarity in awareness or understanding of the terms. DISCUSSION: Hence these terms and their meanings were gleaned from various judgments. The proper meaning of these terms and their use in judicial process and their importance is discussed.

3.
Indian J Psychiatry ; 58(2): 171-7, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27385850

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mentally ill prisoners, when requiring admission in a psychiatric facility, have to be admitted only by a reception order of a judicial magistrate and convicts by warrants issued by the Government to jail superintendents and the superintendent of the hospital. Both can be only under Section 27 of The Mental Health Act, 1987. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A study of the contents of reception order and warrants regarding the acts and section under which they were issued over 1 year period for the admission of the patients in the criminal ward of the Institute of Mental Health was carried out. RESULTS: Only three reception orders quoted Section 27 out of 54 patients admitted under a reception order. Nineteen patients were admitted by the jail superintendents. DISCUSSION: Various issues that were found in the reception order and their consequences are discussed, and a possible response to these issues is mooted. CONCLUSION: Almost none of the reception orders were found to be proper. This deficit needs to be rectified by sensitizing the various authorities.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...