Postoperative Utilization of Opioids After Midurethral Sling Surgery: A Prospective Clinical Practice Study.

IMPORTANCE: This study was performed to understand opioid consumption after midurethral sling (MUS) procedures to provide surgeons with guidelines on appropriate prescription regimens. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate postdischarge narcotic use (PDNU) after MUS surgery using a restrictive postdischarge opioid regimen. STUDY DESIGN: This prospective clinical practice study included women undergoing MUS surgery from December 2018 to October 2019. Patients were discharged with an electronic prescription for 5 tablets of an oral narcotic. Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) surveys were collected preoperatively. Patients answered questions regarding remaining number of opioid tablets, BPI scores, and patient satisfaction on day 1, week 1 (postoperative week [POW] 1), and 4-6 weeks (POW4-6) postoperatively. Electronic records were reviewed to determine narcotic refills. Primary outcome was PDNU measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Secondary outcomes evaluated refill rate, BPI scores, and patient satisfaction. Standard statistical tests were applied. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were included in the analysis. Total median (interquartile range) PDNU was 12.5 (0-37.5) MME at POW1 and 15.0 (0-37.5) MME at POW4-6, which is approximately equivalent to 2 oxycodone (5 mg) tablets. Eighteen patients (32.1%) took 0 narcotics postdischarge. Brief Pain Inventory scores showed that "worst pain" was highest on postoperative day 1 with a median (interquartile range) score of 6 (4-8). At the POW1 and POW4-6 mark, 94.3% and 92% of patients, respectively, were satisfied or extremely satisfied with their pain control. Seven patients (11.8%) required a refill. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients undergoing MUS surgery used no more than 2 oxycodone (5 mg) tablets during their 6-week postoperative course, with almost a third not requiring any narcotics. Low pain scores and high patient satisfaction rates were noted.

Host inflammatory response in women with vaginal epithelial abnormalities after pessary use.

BACKGROUND: Vaginal epithelial abnormalities (VEA) are a common complication associated with pessary use. The objective of this study was to determine if there is a host pro-inflammatory response associated with pessary use and VEA. METHODS: Patients wearing pessaries for at least two weeks for the management of pelvic organ prolapse and/or urinary incontinence were screened for eligibility. Vaginal swabs were collected from women with VEA (cases) and without VEA (controls). Cases were matched to controls in a 1:3 ratio. Cytokine analysis of the collected samples was performed using multiplex analysis to determine the concentrations of interleukin (IL)6, interferon alpha 2 (IFNα2), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) and IL1ß. A cross-sectional analysis was performed, comparing vaginal cytokine concentrations in women with and without VEA. RESULTS: We enrolled 211 patients in this analysis: 50 cases and 161 controls. The median concentrations (pg/mL) of the four cytokines for cases and controls respectively were; IL6: 6.7 (IQR <2.9 [the lower limit of detection, LLD]-14.2) and < 2.9 (LLD) (IQR <2.9 [LLD]-5.5), IFNα2: 8.2 (IQR 6.1-13.9) and 7.9 (IQR 3.9-13.6), TNFα: 15.2 (IQR 6.1-30.4) and 4.68 (IQR <2.3 [LLD]-16.3), IL1ß 195.7 (IQR 54.5-388.6) and 38.5 (IQR 6.7-154.9). The differences in median cytokine levels were statistically higher in cases for IL6, TNFα, and IL1ß (all p < 0.001) compared to controls. Older age (OR: 1.062, 95% CI, 1.015-1.112), lower BMI (OR: 0.910, 95% CI, 0.839-0.986) and presence of VEA at last check (OR: 5.377, 95% CI, 2.049-14.108) were associated with higher odds of having VEA on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Pro-inflammatory cytokines, specifically IL6, TNFα, and IL1ß, are elevated in pessary-wearing patients who have VEA. Additional prospective studies are needed to assess baseline vaginal inflammatory profiles before and after pessary placement to understand VEA formation in pessary patients.

Hysterectomy Versus Uterine Preservation at the Time of Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate national trends in apical prolapse surgery with and without uterine preservation using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. METHODS: Based on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, patients diagnosed with uterovaginal prolapse who underwent apical suspensions between 2013 and 2018 were identified, and procedures involving uterine preservation were differentiated from those with concomitant hysterectomy. Patient characteristics and postoperative complications were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 16 427 patients met inclusion criteria, with 2235 (13.6%) undergoing uterine-preservation procedures and 14 192 (86.4%) undergoing hysterectomy. Between 2013 and 2018, the rates of uterine preservation ranged from 12.8% to 15.3%, with the last 2 years having significantly lower rates. Patients in the uterine-preservation group were older (62.8 vs. 60.5 y; P < 0.001), had higher BMI (28.4 vs. 28.1 kg/m2; P = 0.018), and were more likely to have diabetes (12.4% vs. 10.5%; P = 0.006) and hypertension (43.4% vs. 38.0%; P < 0.001). These patients also had higher frailty index than hysterectomy patients. Patients in the uterine-preservation group were more likely to have vaginal mesh. There were no differences between the 2 groups in length of stay or postoperative complications. On multivariate logistic regression, older age (adjusted odds ratio [aoR] 1.02; P < 0.001), higher BMI (aOR 1.01; P = 0.009), and use of vaginal mesh (aOR 2.75; P < 0.001) were associated with higher odds of uterine preservation. Uterine preservation decreased operative time by about 30 minutes after controlling for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with more comorbidities were more likely to undergo uterine-preserving surgeries, which offered reduced operative time and no differences in postoperative complications.

Development and Validation of a Vaginal Anterior Repair Simulation Model for Surgical Training.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to design and to validate a surgical simulation model for vaginal anterior colporrhaphy. METHODS: Obstetrics and gynecology residents were divided into two groups: "novice" and "advanced." "Expert" group comprised female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery (FPMRS) fellows and faculty. All subjects were recorded performing anterior colporrhaphy using the simulation model. Deidentified, silent videos of recorded performances were evaluated by a blinded reviewer using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) and a procedure-specific assessment, based on the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology milestone evaluation. Analysis of variance was used for statistical comparisons. RESULTS: Thirty-seven participants included 13 novices, 18 advanced residents, and six experts. The experts scored significantly higher than both resident groups in each of the domains of the OSATS and the procedure assessment. The mean OSATS score for experts was 32.30 (±6.06) (maximum, 35); novice, 17.15 (±5.84); and advanced, 21.11 (±5.61) (P = 0.001). The experts' scores for the procedure assessment (maximum, 25) was 23.00 (±3.95); novice, 10.62 (±4.70); and advanced, 14.33 (±4.73) (P < 0.001). The two trainee groups did not differ significantly in their overall performance. Most trainees (29 [94%]) evaluated the model as a useful tool in learning this procedure. CONCLUSIONS: This low-fidelity model can be constructed easily using common materials. The model cost is $43.92 with reusable components ($11 per use). Higher scores by experts versus trainees confirm construct validity of this model. It may serve as a valuable simulation tool allowing trainees to improve their surgical technique for anterior colporrhaphy.

A comprehensive model for pain management in patients undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery: a prospective clinical practice study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative opioid prescription patterns play a key role in driving the opioid epidemic. A comprehensive system toward pain management in surgical patients is necessary to minimize overall opioid consumption. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a pain management model in patients undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery by measuring postdischarge narcotic use in morphine milligram equivalents. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective clinical practice study that included women undergoing inpatient pelvic reconstructive surgery from December 2018 to June 2019 with overnight stay after surgery. As a routine protocol, all the patients followed an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol that included a preoperative multimodal pain regimen. Brief Pain Inventory surveys were collected preoperatively and on postoperative day 1. Brief pain inventory and activities assessment scale scores were collected at postoperative week 1 and postoperative weeks 4-6 after surgery. Patients were discharged with 15 tablets of an oral narcotic using an electronic prescription for controlled substances software platform, which is mandated in the state of Connecticut for all controlled substances, prescriptions, and refills. Patients were called at postoperative week 1 and postoperative weeks 4-6 to answer questions regarding their pain, the number of remaining narcotic tablets, and patient satisfaction regarding pain management. Patient electronic medical records and the Connecticut Prescription Monitoring and Reporting System were reviewed to determine whether patients received narcotic refills. Primary outcome was postdischarge narcotic use measured in morphine milligram equivalents. Secondary outcomes evaluated refill rate, brief pain inventory and activities assessment scale scores, and patient satisfaction with pain management. Descriptive statistics were described as mean and standard deviation and median and interquartile range. Bivariate comparisons used Spearman's rho (ρ) with α=0.05. RESULTS: A total 113 patients were enrolled; the median (interquartile range) morphine milligram equivalent prescribed (including refills) was 112.5 (112.5-112.5). The median postdischarge narcotic use was 24.0 (0-82.5) morphine milligram equivalent, which is equivalent to fewer than 4 oxycodone (5 mg) tablets. About 75% of our participants required fewer than 11 oxycodone tablets. The median unused morphine milligram equivalent was 90.0 (45-112.5). 81.4% (92/113), and 83.2% (94/113) of patients at postoperative week 1 and postoperative weeks 4-6, respectively, reported being satisfied or extremely satisfied with their postdischarge pain control. About 88.5% (100/113) of patients felt that the number of opioids they were discharged with was sufficient for their pain needs at the postoperative 1 and postoperative weeks 4-6 time points. At postoperative weeks 4-6, 19.5% of patients said that they filled the narcotic prescription but did not use any of the pills. The overall refill rate was 10.6% (12/113). All patients who needed a refill described the refill process as easy. In-hospital narcotic use was not predictive of postdischarge narcotic use (ρ0.065, P=.495). Patients reported median brief pain inventory scores for "average pain" of 0 (no pain) at postoperative week 1 and postoperative weeks 4-6; however, the scores did not clinically correlate with postdischarge narcotic use. Activities assessment scale scores were not correlated with postdischarge narcotic use. CONCLUSION: Most patients after pelvic reconstructive surgery used fewer than 11 oxycodone (5 mg) tablets, averaging less than 4 tablets, with a third of patients not requiring any opioids. Pain and activities scores did not correlate with narcotic use. A minimal number of opioids can be prescribed because the secure electronic prescribing system allows for convenient electronic refill if required. Our practical and comprehensive pre- and postoperative protocol for pain management minimizes opioid consumption in addition to maximizing patient satisfaction.

Patient-Initiated Telephone Calls in the Postoperative Period After Female Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate reasons and factors associated with patient calls in the postoperative period after female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review using electronic medical records was performed on consecutive patients who underwent surgery within our academic female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery practice during a 6-month period. Calls after postoperative discharge until first scheduled postoperative visit were included. Reasons and number of calls were tabulated. Clinical and surgical factors were extracted. Continuous data were evaluated with a Student t test or analysis of variance; categorical data were evaluated with a χ test. P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: During the designated period, 302 patients underwent surgery, and 173 (57.3%) patients made 345 calls (mean ± SD, 2.0 ± 1.5 calls). Reasons were categorized under 6 distinct domains: bowel, pain, activity, medication regimen, urinary, and bleeding. The most frequent concern within each domain was constipation (11.6%), abdominal pain (6.4%), physical activity (8.7%), pain regimen (14.5%), urinary catheter related (13.3%), and vaginal bleeding (12.1%), respectively. A greater number of phone calls were recorded among patients discharged home with catheters (P = 0.015), and patients who underwent posterior colporrhaphy (P = 0.005) and retropubic urethropexy (P = 0.014). Patients discharged with home nursing (11, 6.4%) demonstrated a significantly higher number of phone calls (3.8 ± 2.5, P < 0.001). Evaluations were required for 37% of callers. Twelve patients were seen in the emergency department, of whom 3 (1.7%) were readmitted to the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative patient-initiated telephone calls after pelvic reconstructive surgery are common. Bowel-, urinary-, and medication-based phone calls account for the highest frequency and volume.

Predictive Factors of Postdischarge Narcotic Use After Female Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the association of patient factors, amount of in-hospital postoperative narcotics, and pain scores on postdischarge narcotic use (PDNU). METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial comparing a postoperative usual-care regimen with multimodal pain regimen after pelvic reconstructive surgery. This analysis evaluated patients in the multimodal arm. Postdischarge narcotic use (as mg oral morphine equivalents, MME, calculated from narcotic tablets remaining) was assessed postoperative days 7 to 10. Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) surveys were collected preoperatively and at postoperative day 1. Patient factors were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analysis. Correlations examined the relationships between PDNU and postoperative in-hospital narcotic use and BPI scores. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients randomized to the multimodal pain regimen arm had median (interquartile range) PDNU of 22.5 (0-159.4) MME. After excluding postdischarge narcotic nonusers (34.8%), the median PDNU was 127.5 (22.5-180.0) MME. The median PDNU was 172.5 (150.0-180.0) MME after abdominal reconstructive surgery (n = 7), 82.5 (28.1-180.0) MME after laparoscopic reconstructive surgery (n = 22), and 37.5 (13.1-181.2) MME after vaginal reconstructive surgery (n = 14). A linear correlation was noted between the amount of postoperative narcotics used in-hospital and the amount needed postdischarge after abdominal (r = 0.588, P = 0.057), laparoscopic (r = 0.439, P = 0.019), and vaginal (r = 0.455, P = 0.017) reconstructive surgeries. The BPI scores on postoperative day 1 for "average" pain (r = 0.388, P = 0.002) and "now" pain (r = 0.490, P < 0.001), and on postoperative week 1 for "average" pain (r = 0.383, P = 0.002) and "now" pain (r = 0.389, P = 0.002) correlated with PDNU. CONCLUSIONS: Amount of postoperative in-hospital use of narcotic medications and BPI scores can be valuable predictors of PDNU in patients undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Pelvic floor disorders in women with gynecologic malignancies: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) negatively affect quality of life in the general population, and their prevalence in gynecologic cancer survivors has not been systematically described. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of PFDs in cancer survivors. We hypothesized that the prevalence of PFDs in the gynecologic cancer population would be higher than in the general female population. METHODS: We searched PubMed (1809 to present), EMBASE (1974 to present), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) through May 2017. The search combined subject headings, title, and abstract words for gynecologic cancer, PFDs, and prevalence. Any studies evaluating the prevalence of PFDs in gynecologic malignancies were included. RESULTS: A total of 550 articles met the designated search criteria and 31 articles were included in this review. In cervical cancer survivors, before treatment the prevalences of stress urinary incontinence (SUI), urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) and fecal incontinence (FI) were 24-29%, 8-18% and 6%, respectively, and after treatment the prevalences of SUI, UUI, urinary retention, FI, fecal urge, dyspareunia and vaginal dryness were 4-76%, 4-59%, 0.4-39%, 2-34%, 3-49%, 12-58% and 15-47%, respectively. In uterine cancer survivors, before treatment the prevalences of SUI, UUI and FI were 29-36%, 15-25% and 3%, respectively, and after treatment the prevalences of urinary incontinence (UI) and dyspareunia were 2-44% and 7-39%, respectively. In vulvar cancer survivors, after treatment the prevalences of UI, SUI and FI were 4-32%, 6-20% and 1-20%, respectively. In ovarian cancer survivors, the prevalences of SUI, UUI, prolapse and sexual dysfunction were 32-42%, 15-39%, 17% and 62-75%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PFDs are prevalent in gynecologic cancer survivors and this is an important area of clinical concern and future research.

Community Awareness of HPV Screening and Vaccination in Odisha.

Introduction. A number of new technologies including cervical cancer screening and vaccination have introduced new tools in the fight against cervical cancer. Methods. This study was set in Odisha, India, at the Acharya Harihar Regional Cancer Center and study research infrastructure at the Asian Institute of Public Health. IRB approvals were obtained and a research assistant recruited 286 women aged 18-49 years, who provided informed consent and completed a survey tool. Data were entered into EpiData software and statistical analysis was conducted. Results. 76.3% women participants were married, 45.5% had sexual debut at age 21 or greater, 60.5% used contraception, 12.2% reported having a Pap smear in the past, and 4.9% reported having prior genital warts. Most, 68.8% had never heard of HPV and 11.9% were aware that HPV is the main cause of cervical cancer. 82.9% women thought that vaccinations prevent disease, and 74.8% said they make the decision to vaccinate their children. Conclusion. The Odisha community demonstrated a low level of knowledge about cervical cancer prevention, accepted vaccinations in the prevention of disease and screening, and identified mothers/guardians as the key family contacts.