Quantification of regional left ventricular function in Q wave and non-Q wave dysfunctional regions by tissue Doppler imaging in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify regional left ventricular (LV) function and contractile reserve in Q wave and non-Q wave regions in patients with previous myocardial infarction. DESIGN: An observational study. SETTING: Tertiary care centre. PATIENTS: 81 patients with previous myocardial infarction and depressed LV function. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent surface ECG at rest and pulsed wave tissue Doppler imaging at rest and during low dose dobutamine infusion. The left ventricle was divided into four major regions (anterior, inferoposterior, septal, and lateral). Severely hypokinetic, akinetic, and dyskinetic regions on two dimensional echocardiography at rest were considered dysfunctional. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Regional myocardial systolic velocity (Vs) at rest and the change in Vs during low dose dobutamine infusion (DeltaVs) in dysfunctional regions with and without Q waves on surface ECG. RESULTS: 220 (69%) regions were dysfunctional; 60 of these regions corresponded to Q waves and 160 were not related to Q waves. Vs and DeltaVs were lower in dysfunctional than in non-dysfunctional regions (mean (SD) Vs 6.2 (1.9) cm/s v 7.1 (1.7) cm/s (p < 0.001), and DeltaVs 1.9 (1.9) cm/s v 2.6 (2.5) cm/s (p = 0.009), respectively). There were no significant differences in Vs and DeltaVs among dysfunctional regions with and without Q waves (Q wave regions: Vs 6.2 (1.8) cm/s, DeltaVs 1.6 (2.2) cm/s; non-Q wave regions: Vs 6.3 (1.9) cm/s, DeltaVs 2.0 (2.0) cm/s). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative pulsed wave tissue Doppler demonstrated that, among dysfunctional regions, Q waves on the ECG do not indicate more severe dysfunction, and myocardial contractile reserve is comparable in Q wave and non-Q wave dysfunctional myocardium.

Influence of contractile reserve and inducible ischaemia on left ventricular remodelling after acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relative influence of contractile reserve and inducible ischaemia on subsequent left ventricular volume changes after myocardial infarction. DESIGN: Left ventricular end diastolic and end systolic index volumes were calculated prospectively at discharge and at six months in 143 patients referred for early postinfarction dobutamine stress echocardiography. On the basis of their responses to this test, patients were divided into three groups: scar (n = 48; group 1); contractile reserve (n = 36; group 2); inducible ischaemia (n = 59; group 3). RESULTS: At six months, the left ventricular end diastolic index volume decreased in group 2 (mean (SD), -3.9 (9.4) ml/m2) and increased in both group 1 (+2.8 (10.6) ml/m2, p = 0.009 v group 2) and group 3 (+7.5 (11.4) ml/m2, p < 0.0001 v group 2). The end systolic index volume decreased in group 2 (-4.9 (7.3) ml/m2) and increased in both group 1 (+1.3 (8.3) ml/m2, p = 0.0015 v group 2) and group 3 (+2.8 (8.9) ml/m2, p = 0.0002 v group 2). In multivariate analysis, the contractile reserve (hazard ratio 0.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14 to 0.47), inducible ischaemia (5.86, 95% CI 1.54 to 29.7), and end systolic index volume at discharge (1.04, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.11) were independent predictors of an increase in end diastolic index volume of > or = 15 ml/m2 at six months. CONCLUSIONS: Contractile reserve and inducible ischaemia, as detected by early dobutamine stress echocardiography, identify patients with differences in long term left ventricular remodelling after acute myocardial infarction.

Post-extrasystolic potentiation recruits incremental contractile reserve of dyssynergic myocardium during dobutamine stress testing: evidence by pulsed wave tissue Doppler imaging.

Dobutamine stress echocardiography is an established diagnostic method for the detection of myocardial viability in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction([1]). The presence of viable myocardium identifies patients who will benefit from coronary revascularization, by improving both functional capacity and long-term survival. Occasionally, dobutamine infusion has been combined with other stressors, such as post-extrasystolic potentiation, in order to improve accuracy. The contractile reserve after combined dobutamine infusion and post-extrasystolic potentiation can be quantified by pulsed wave tissue Doppler imaging. We describe a patient with severe left ventricular dysfunction, in which pulsed wave tissue Doppler imaging allowed to demonstrate that post-extrasystolic potentiation superimposed on dobutamine infusion is able to further recruit contractile reserve, as compared to dobutamine infusion alone. A nuclear scan assessing glucose utilization was used as a reference.

Unfavourable left ventricular remodelling in patients with dobutamine-inducible ischaemia after acute myocardial infarction.

AIMS: Aim of the study was to assess the role of early inducible ischaemia for determining left ventricular remodelling in patients with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 179 consecutive patients with first myocardial infarction the occurrence of new wall motion abnormalities during dobutamine stress echocardiography at discharge was related to the left ventricular volume changes at 6 months. Left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic index volumes (mL/m(2)) were echocardiographically detected at discharge and at 6 months and the relative changes were calculated. The study population consisted of 105 patients without and 74 patients with inducible ischaemia; of these, 46 patients had > or =4 ischaemic segments. At 6 months, the end-diastolic index volume increased in patients with inducible ischaemia compared to patients without (+7.5+/-11.2 vs -0.1+/-10.2 mL/m(2); P=0.0049) and final mean end-diastolic volume was greater in patients with inducible ischaemia than without (70.8+/-16.0 vs 61.1+/-17.0 mL/m(2); P=0.0012). The end-systolic volume increased at 6 months in patients with inducible ischaemia and it decreased in patients without (+2.8+/-8.6 vs -1.4+/-7.8 mL/m(2); P=0.021). At the multivariate analysis, inducible ischaemia in > or =4 segments (odds ratio=6.43), the wall motion score index at the peak of dobutamine infusion (odds ratio=1.14) and the end-systolic index volume at discharge (odds ratio=1.06) were independent predictors of subsequent left ventricular end-diastolic index volume increase > or =15 mL/m(2). CONCLUSION: In patients with first myocardial infarction the presence and the severity of inducible ischaemia, as detected by dobutamine stress echocardiography at discharge, indicates an unfavourable left ventricular remodelling.

Angiographic and prognostic correlates of cardiac output by cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with anterior myocardial infarction.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic and prognostic value of cardiac output assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with anterior acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and left ventricular dysfunction. PATIENTS AND SETTING: Forty-six patients with AMI (7 female patients; mean +/- SD age, 55 +/- 8 years; ejection fraction, 39 +/- 7%) underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing and coronary angiography following hospital discharge. MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS: Cardiac output was estimated from oxygen uptake (VO(2)) during exercise according to a method based on the linear regression between arteriovenous oxygen content difference and percent maximum VO(2). Angiograms were scored using Gensini and Duke "jeopardy" scores. Cardiac output at anaerobic threshold (COAT) < or = 7.3 L/min was the best cutoff value for identifying multivessel coronary artery disease (relative risk, 3.1). Angiographic scores were significantly higher in patients with COAT < 7.3 L/min as compared to those with COAT > 7.3 L/min (82 +/- 8 vs 53 +/- 7 and 6 +/- 2 vs 4 +/- 3, respectively; p < 0.05) and were inversely and significantly correlated to COAT. Conversely, no correlation was found with ECG changes. COAT, VO(2) at anaerobic threshold, and peak VO(2) were univariate prognostic indicators. However, using Cox's model, COAT was the only multivariate predictor of outcome (odds ratio, 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09 to 0.9). Moreover, COAT < 7.3 L/min was associated to an increased risk of further cardiac events (odds ratio, 5; 95% CI, 1.4 to 17) and provided a significant discrimination of survival for the combined end point of cardiac death, reinfarction, and clinically driven revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: COAT is a safe and feasible tool providing additional diagnostic and prognostic information in patients with AMI.

Usefulness and limitations of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block. A multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with left bundle branch block exhibit abnormal septal motion which may limit the interpretation of stress echocardiograms. This study sought to assess the diagnostic value of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography in left bundle branch block patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-four left bundle branch block patients (mean age 59 years, 24 men) with suspected coronary artery disease underwent dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography and coronary arteriography. Myocardial ischaemia was defined as new or worsening wall thickening abnormalities. Coronary artery disease was quantitatively defined as a diameter stenosis >/=50% in a major epicardial artery. Rest septal motion was normal (apart from the early systolic septal notch) in 34 patients (53%) and abnormal in 30 patients (47%). Rest septal thickening was normal in 32 patients (50%) and abnormal in 32 patients (50%). All seven patients with a QRS duration >/=160 ms and an abnormal QRS axis had abnormal rest septal motion and thickening. Inter-observer agreement for ischaemia was 88%. In all but one patient disagreement was in the septum. For the anterior and posterior circulation, respectively, sensitivity was 60% (9/15) and 67% (8/12), specificity was 94% (46/49) and 98% (51/52), and accuracy was 86% (55/64) and 92% (59/64). Sensitivity for the anterior circulation tended to be better in patients with normal rest septal thickening (83% vs 44%). CONCLUSIONS: Dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography has excellent diagnostic specificity in left bundle branch block patients with suspected coronary artery disease. In patients with abnormal rest septal thickening, however, dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography may lack good sensitivity for detection of coronary artery disease in the anterior circulation. Left bundle branch block patients who potentially most benefit from dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography may initially be selected by their resting electrocardiogram.

Prognostic usefulness of dobutamine-induced ST-segment elevation and T-wave normalization after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction.

We followed 229 consecutive patients exhibiting negative T waves on infarct-related electrocardiographic leads; these patients underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography within 10 days after a first uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction. T-wave normalization, but not ST-segment elevation, recognized patients at higher risk of cardiac events and optimized the prognostic accuracy of both myocardial viability and ischemia, to which it was correlated and became an independent predictor in cases of subdiagnostic stress echocardiography.

Doppler tissue velocity sampling improves diagnostic accuracy during dobutamine stress echocardiography for the assessment of viable myocardium in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Both nuclear imaging with F18-fluorodeoxyglucose and dobutamine stress echocardiography have been used to identify viable myocardium, although dobutamine-stress echocardiography has been demonstrated to be the less sensitive of the two. AIM: To compare the accuracy of pulsed-wave Doppler tissue sampling with dobutamine-stress echocardiography for the detection of viable myocardium, using F18-fluorodeoxyglucose imaging as a reference. Methods Forty patients with chronic coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction (mean ejection fraction 33+/-11%), underwent F18-fluorodeoxyglucose imaging, dobutamine-stress echocardiography and pulsed-wave Doppler tissue sampling. Evaluation was performed using a six-segment model. RESULTS: Visual assessment by resting echo was feasible in 230 out of 240 segments (96%); 177 (77%) segments showed severe dyssynergy at rest. F18-fluorodeoxyglucose imaging showed viability in 95 (54%) segments while 82 (46%) were non-viable. Ejection phase velocity at rest was not significantly different; ejection velocities during low-dose and peak-dose dobutamine, however, were significantly higher in viable myocardium (8.6+/-2.9 vs 6.0+/-1.8 and 9.3+/-3.1 vs 6.2+/-2.1 cm x s(-1)). Using receiver operating characteristic curves the optimal cut-off value for viability assessment was an increase in the ejection phase velocity low-dose of 1+/-0.5 cm x s(-1), while 0+/-0.5 cm x s(-1)predicted non-viability. The sensitivity and specificity (95%CI) of pulsed-wave Doppler tissue sampling and dobutamine-stress echocardiography for the prediction of viability was respectively 87% (82-92) vs 75% (67-81) (P<0.05) and 52% (44-59) vs 51% (45-59) (P=ns). CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of pulsed-wave Doppler tissue sampling is superior to dobutamine-stress echocardiography for the assessment of myocardial viability.

Usefulness of the ejection fraction response to dobutamine infusion in predicting functional recovery after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

Quantification of dysfunctional but viable myocardium has high prognostic value for improvement of left ventricular (LV) function after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) can assess viable myocardium by segmental wall motion changes during stress. However, analysis of wall motion is subjective with only moderate interinstitutional agreement (70%) and frequently overestimates functional improvement after CABG. In contrast, calculation of ejection fraction (EF) is less subjective and allows a more precise quantification of global contractile reserve. The aim of the study was to compare the prognostic value of EF response and segmental wall motion changes during DSE for the prediction of LV functional recovery after CABG. Forty patients underwent DSE before CABG. EF responses were assessed at rest, low-dose dobutamine, and at peak stress using the biplane disk method. Wall motion was scored using a 16-segment 5-point model. Resting radionuclide ventriculography (RNV-LVEF), performed before and 8 +/- 2 months after CABG, was used as an independent reference. Five patients were excluded because of perioperative infarction or poor echo images. In 11 of 35 patients, RNV-LVEF recovered >5%. Improvement in EF during dobutamine infusion predicted RNV-LVEF recovery after CABG significantly better than segmental wall motion changes (72% vs 53%, p = 0.03). A biphasic EF response (i.e., improvement in > or =10% at low dose and subsequent worsening at peak stress) had the highest predictive value (80%) for late functional recovery. In conclusion, EF response to dobutamine infusion was superior to segmental wall motion changes in predicting RNV-LVEF recovery after CABG.

Safety and prognostic value of early dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography in patients with spontaneous chest pain and a non-diagnostic electrocardiogram.

AIMS: To risk stratify and shorten hospital stay in patients with spontaneous (resting) chest pain and a non-diagnostic electrocardiogram (ECG). METHODS AND RESULTS: The study comprised 102 patients (mean age 58+/-12 years, 67 men) with spontaneous chest pain and a non-diagnostic ECG. Forty-three patients had suspected coronary artery disease and 59 had known (but of unknown actual significance) coronary artery disease. All patients underwent serial creatine kinase enzyme measurements, continuous ECG monitoring for at least 12 h and early dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography in patients with negative creatine kinase enzymes and normal findings at ECG monitoring. Dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography was considered positive in patients with new or worsening wall thickening abnormalities. Patients with negative dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography were discharged after the test. In-hospital and 6 month follow-up events noted were cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and coronary artery bypass surgery or angioplasty. Thirteen patients had evidence of evolving myocardial infarction by elevated creatine kinase enzymes, or unstable angina by ECG monitoring. In the remaining 89 patients, dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography was performed after a median observation period of 31 h (range 12-68 h). During dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography no serious complications (death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation) occurred. Dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography results were of poor quality in three, non-diagnostic in six, negative in 44 and positive in 36 patients. In the 80 patients with diagnostic dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography, variables associated with in-hospital events (n=7) were history of exertional angina (P<0. 005), chest pain score (P<0.005), stress-induced angina (P<0.001) and positive dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography (P<0.005). Variables associated with follow-up events (n=11) were history of exertional angina (P<0.05), chest pain score (P<0.001), stress-induced angina (P<0.01) and positive dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography (P<0.01). At multivariate analysis the only significant predictor of events was positive dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: Early dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography may safely distinguish between low- and high-risk subsets for subsequent cardiac events in patients with spontaneous chest pain and a non-diagnostic ECG.

Cardiac evaluation in hypotension-prone and hypotension-resistant hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Hypotension during hemodialysis occurs frequently, but the precise mechanism remains unclear. In this study, the presence of myocardial ischemia and myocardial contractile reserve during infusions of the beta-adrenergic receptor agonist dobutamine was assessed by means of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography (DSE) in hypotension-prone (HP) and hypotension-resistant (HR) hemodialysis patients. METHODS: Eighteen HP patients (age 53 +/- 6 years) were compared with 18 HR patients (age 53 +/- 3 years), matched with respect to the duration of hemodialysis and cardiovascular history. New wall abnormalities during dobutamine stress reflect the presence of myocardial ischemia, whereas the increase in stroke index and cardiac index reflects myocardial contractile reserve. RESULTS: Wall motion score at rest (1.42 +/- 0.53 vs. 1.44 +/- 0.57) and dobutamine-induced new wall motion abnormalities (4 vs. 3 patients) between HP and HR patients were similar, but responses of cardiac index, stroke index, and systolic blood pressure to do butamine between the two groups were different. Not withstanding a similar cardiac index at rest (2.4 +/- 1.1 liter/min/m2 in HP and 2.8 +/- 1.2 liter/min/m2 in HR patients), dobutamine-induced increments in the cardiac index were considerably smaller in the former (0.8 +/- 1.3 liter/min/m2) than in the latter patients (2.3 +/- 1.6 liter/min/m2, P = 0.002), predominantly because of a progressive decrease in the stroke index in the HP patients. CONCLUSION: Impaired myocardial contractile reserve rather than ischemia is predominant in HP patients. This impaired myocardial contractile reserve may play a role in the development of hemodialysis-induced hypotension.

Stroke volume changes during dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography: the influence of heart rate and ischaemia.

BACKGROUND: A decrease in stroke volume during dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography heralds ischaemia and possible hypotension. Hypotension results from worsening of LV-function (as a result of ischaemia) left ventricular outflow tract obstruction or hypovolemia, while an increase of stroke volume indicates the preservation of myocardial contractile reserve. OBJECTIVE: To assess stroke volume changes during dobutamine stress echocardiography in relation to heart rate and occurrence of ischaemia and to validate a new automated cardiac output measurement device. METHODS: In fifty patients, the stroke volume was assessed using the echocardiographic biplane discs method during a stress echocardiography. These data were reference values for the validation of a new automated cardiac output measurement using the first method as a reference. RESULTS: Stroke volume measured by the biplane discs method and automated cardiac output device decreased from rest to peak stress, respectively, from 54+/-16 to 34+/-9 (63%) ml and 63+/-17 to 38+/-15 (60%) ml (p < 0.001). Stroke volume decreased with increased heart rate and stress-induced ischaemia when assessed by the biplane discs method, but with the automated device it decreased only with increased heart rate. CONCLUSIONS: Both increased heart rate and myocardial ischaemia during dobutamine stress echocardiography cause a reduction of stroke volume. However, the automated device did not detect the effects of stress-induced ischaemia on stroke volume. It appears that the biplane discs method is more sensitive for evaluating the effect of ischaemia.

Dobutamine-induced T wave positivization after uncomplicated myocardial infarction: a marker of myocardial viability and higher cardiac risk.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction, T wave positivization during stress testing may unveil myocardial viability. We evaluated in a prospective study the clinical value of T wave positivization during dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with recent, first uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-nine patients, who underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography within 10 days of uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction, were selected for exhibiting negative T waves in the infarct area. A mean follow-up of 2.1 +/- 1 years (up to 6 years) was obtained. RESULTS: T wave positivization appeared during dobutamine test in 76 (33%) patients. The agreement of T wave positivization for myocardial viability was 65% (95% confidence interval 59-71). Compared to myocardial viability during dobutamine stress echocardiography, the combination with T wave positivization was more sensitive (55 vs 24%, 95% confidence interval 46-64 vs 17-33) for predicting cardiac events, albeit less specific. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed 47 (62%) cardiac events in patients with T wave positivization and 70 (46%) cardiac events in the remaining patients (p < 0.05). Soft (n = 91) prevailed over hard (n = 26) cardiac events. CONCLUSIONS: T wave positivization during dobutamine stress echocardiography after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction identifies patients at higher cardiac risk, and is more sensitive, albeit less specific, for cardiac events than viability alone. T wave positivization is helpful in the case of inconclusive stress echocardiography. The pathophysiology of T wave positivization and its relative value among other variables warrant further analysis.

Dobutamine stress echocardiography and technetium-99m-tetrofosmin/fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose single-photon emission computed tomography and influence of resting ejection fraction to assess myocardial viability in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and healed myocardial infarction.

The purpose of this study was to compare 2 different techniques--dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography (DSE) and dual-isotope simultaneous acquisition (technetium-99-m-tetrofosmin/fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose) single-photon emission computed tomography (DISA-SPECT)--for assessment of viable myocardium. One hundred ten patients (mean age 55 +/- 9 years) with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (mean LV ejection fraction 27 +/- 13%) underwent both DISA-SPECT and DSE. A 16-segment scoring model was adopted for both techniques. Four types of wall motion during DSE were assessed: (1) biphasic, improvement at low dose (10 microg/kg/min) with worsening at high dose; (2) worsening, deterioration without initial improvement; (3) sustained, persistent or late improvement; and (4) no change. Viability criteria were biphasic, worsening, and sustained improvement with DSE. Viability criteria with DISA-SPECT were normal perfusion and metabolism (normal), concordantly mildly reduced perfusion and metabolism (subendocardial scar), or severely reduced perfusion and increased metabolism (mismatch). Myocardium was considered nonviable with DSE in case of unchanged wall motion, or moderate reduction or absence in both technetium-99m-tetrofosmin perfusion and fluorodeoxyglucose uptake with DISA-SPECT. Of 1,756 of 1,760 analyzable LV segments, 1,373 (78%) had severe wall motion abnormalities at baseline (severe hypokinesia, akinesia, or dyskinesia). Of these abnormal segments, 282 (21%) were considered viable during DSE (63 [5%] with biphasic response, 47 [3%] with ischemia, and 172 [13%]) with sustained improvement, whereas 1,091 (79%) were considered nonviable. With DISA-SPECT, 396 (29%) segments were considered viable (312 [23%] with matched perfusion/metabolism and 84 [6%] with mismatch), whereas 977 segments (71%) were considered nonviable. Both techniques showed agreement for viability in 201 segments and 896 were concordantly classified as nonviable. Disagreement was present in 276 segments of which 195 (71%) were nonviable with DSE and viable with DISA-SPECT. Overall agreement between the 2 techniques was 81% (kappa 0.46) in a subgroup of patients with an ejection fraction <25% 78% (kappa 0.39). Thus, DSE and DISA-SPECT show good agreement for assessing viable myocardium not influenced by resting ejection fraction. DSE underestimated the amount of viable tissue compared with DISA-SPECT.

Improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction, heart failure symptoms and prognosis after revascularization in patients with chronic coronary artery disease and viable myocardium detected by dobutamine stress echocardiography.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to address, in patients with severe ischemic left ventricular dysfunction, whether dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) can predict improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), functional status and long-term prognosis after revascularization. BACKGROUND: Dobutamine stress echocardiography can predict improvement of wall motion after revascularization. The relation between viability, improvement of function, improvement of heart failure symptoms and long-term prognosis has not been studied. METHODS: We studied 68 patients with DSE before revascularization; 62 patients underwent resting echocardiography/radionuclide ventriculography before and three months after revascularization. Long-term follow-up data (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class, Canadian Cardiovascular Society [CCS] classification and events) were acquired up to two years. RESULTS: Patients with > or =4 viable segments on DSE (group A, n = 22) improved in LVEF at three months (from 27+/-6% to 33+/-7%, p < 0.01), in NYHA functional class (from 3.2+/-0.7 to 1.6+/-0.5, p < 0.01) and in CCS classification (from 2.9+/-0.3 to 1.2+/-0.4, p < 0.01); in patients with <4 viable segments (group B, n = 40) LVEF and NYHA functional class did not improve, whereas CCS classification improved significantly (from 3.0+/-0.8 to 1.3+/-0.5, p < 0.01). A higher event rate was observed at long-term follow-up in group B versus group A (47% vs. 17%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with substantial viability on DSE demonstrated improvement in LVEF and NYHA functional class after revascularization; viability was also associated with a favorable prognosis after revascularization.

Safety and utility of atropine addition during dobutamine stress echocardiography for the assessment of viable myocardium in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility safety and side effects of the addition of atropine to dobutamine stress echocardiography for the detection of viable myocardium in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction < or = 35%) prior to coronary revascularization. BACKGROUND: The assessment of viable and/or ischaemic myocardium has high prognostic value as regards improvement of function and survival after coronary revascularization. The addition of atropine to dobutamine during echocardiographic testing for the presence of viable myocardium is not common practice. Consequently, no data exist on the safety and additional diagnostic value of this practice. METHODS: Two hundred patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 35% were studied. RESULTS: Test end-points were: target heart rate in 164 (82%) of the patients, severe angina in 18 (9%), maximum dobutamine-atropine dose in six (3%), severe ST segment changes in five (2%), cardiac arrhythmias in four (2%), and hypotension in three (1%). Viability could be assessed echocardiogaphically in 105/200 (53%) from a biphasic response (improvement of wall motion with low dose dobutamine and worsening with high dose), in 93 from ischaemia and in 12 from sustained or late improvements. In 36/105 (34%) patients, ischaemic myocardium could only be assessed after the addition of atropine. Cardiac arrhythmias occurred in 11/200 (6%) and hypotension (decrease of systolic blood pressure >30 mmHg) in 21/200 (11%). Neither the use of atropine nor the induction of ischaemia were associated with an increased incidence of cardiac arrhythmias or hypotension. CONCLUSIONS: In a large group of patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction, dobutamine stress echocardiography is feasible and safe in 186/200 (93%); the addition of atropine was necessary in 34% to assess myocardial viability. Hypotension and cardiac arrhythmias were the most frequent side effects, but were not related to the induction of ischaemia or addition of atropine.

Early recovery of wall motion abnormalities after recanalization of chronic totally occluded coronary arteries: a dobutamine echocardiographic, prospective, single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Patients with symptomatic myocardial ischemia from a chronic totally occluded coronary (TOC) artery are usually referred for coronary artery bypass surgery. Because guide wire technology has improved considerably in recent years, percutaneous coronary angioplasty has become a useful technique in opening chronic TOC arteries. We evaluated the early functional results of successful percutaneous recanalization by performing dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). METHODS: Fifteen patients with a chronic TOC artery who underwent a successful recanalization were prospectively studied. Each patient had a DSE within 24 hours before and 48 hours after the procedure. Wall motion was scored according to a 16-segment/5-point model. A clinical and angiographic follow-up of 6 months was obtained. RESULTS: The wall motion score index at rest improved from 1.26+/-0.23 before to 1.22+/-0.21 after the procedure (P < .05). Of those 10 segments that improved at rest, 7 were collateral recipients and 3 were collateral donors. The number of ischemic segments decreased from 46 before to 4 after the procedure (P < .0001). Wall motion score index at peak stress improved from 1.34+/-0.20 before to 1.15+/-0.12 after the procedure (P < .05). DSE was positive for ischemia in 15 patients before and 2 patients after the procedure (P < .0001). Angina was present in 12 patients before and in 2 patients after recanalization (P < .0001). Two patients (13%) had angiographic reocclusion and 5(33%) restenosis after 6 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Successful percutaneous recanalization of chronic TOC artery results in an early improvement of both clinical status and resting or stress-induced wall motion abnormalities, as detected by DSE.

Usefulness of pulse-wave Doppler tissue sampling and dobutamine stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of right coronary artery narrowing.

To study the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of right coronary artery (RCA) narrowing by right ventricular (RV) pulse-wave Doppler tissue sampling during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE), 30 patients (mean age 55 +/- 9.5 years, 26 men) with suspected coronary artery disease underwent DSE (up to 40 microg/kg/min with additional atropine during submaximum heart rate responses). Pulse-wave Doppler tissue sampling of RV free walls close to the tricuspid annulus was performed in the apical 4-chamber view. The maximum velocity during the ejection phase, early, and late diastole was measured. Data from 5 consecutive beats were averaged. The measurements were repeated at rest, at low dose (10 microg/kg/min), and at peak dobutamine stress. The results were evaluated for the prediction of significant proximal or medium RCA narrowing (> or = 50% diameter stenosis, assessed by quantitative coronary angiography within the previous 3 months). A progressive increase of the ejection phase velocity (> 25% between 10 microg/kg/min and peak stress) was predictive of a normal RCA, whereas a blunted increase and/or decrease (< 25% of increase) was predictive of significant RCA narrowing: sensitivity (95% confidence intervals): 82% (68 to 96), specificity: 78% (67 to 93), positive predictive value: 69% (52 to 86), negative predictive value: 88% (75 to 100), accuracy: 79% (65 to 94). Pulse-wave Doppler tissue sampling provided analyzable data in 100%, whereas the visual assessment of gray-scale images was possible only in 90%. Thus, in patients with suspected RCA narrowing, pulse-wave Doppler tissue sampling during DSE was able to diagnose significant RCA narrowing.

Myocardial viability: known and unknown.

The assessment of myocardial viability has gained a lot of attention over the past few years. Various imaging techniques, mainly nuclear and echocardiographic approaches, have been developed for this purpose. From the existing data, it has become clear that the presence of dysfunctional yet viable myocardium can predict improvement of regional and global left ventricular (LV) function after revascularization. This issue is most relevant in patients with severely depressed LV function, since in these patients revascularization carries a high (peri-)procedural risk on the one hand, but may substantially improve LV function in some patients. Besides the improvement of resting LV function after revascularization, other end-points may also be clinically relevant, including the response during stress, improvement of exercise capacity, the quality of life and the prevention of LV remodeling. These issues have not been studied extensively thusfar. Finally, several retrospective studies have shown the prognostic value of viability assessment; patients with viable but jeopardized myocardium were significantly more prone to experience cardiac events than patients with viability who underwent revascularization. The different aspects of viability assessment (including pathophysiology, available techniques, current implications and unresolved issues) will be addressed in this manuscript.