Effects of the short-acting insulin analog [Lys(B28),Pro(B29)] on postprandial blood glucose control in IDDM.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the effects of the short-acting insulin analog Lispro versus human regular insulin (Hum-R) on postprandial metabolic control in IDDM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Four studies were performed in 10 C-peptide-negative IDDM patients. Lispro or Hum-R (0.15 U/kg) or Lispro + NPH (0.07 U/kg) or Hum-R + NPH were injected subcutaneously 30 min (Hum-R) or 5 min (Lispro) before lunch. Preprandial plasma glucose (PG) was maintained on all four occasions at approximately 7.3 mmol/l by intravenous insulin. RESULTS: After subcutaneous Lispro injection, plasma free insulin (FIRI) was greater between 0 and 2 h (233 +/- 22 pmol/l) than after Hum-R (197 +/- 25 pmol/l) but lower between 2.25 and 7 h (81 +/- 10 vs. 104 +/- 13 pmol/l, P < 0.05). After Lispro, PG was lower versus Hum-R for 3 h (7.4 +/- 0.6 vs. 8.3 +/- 0.9 mmol/l) but subsequently increased more than after Hum-R (3.25-7h, 11.3 +/- 1 vs. 9.6 +/- 1.2 mmol/l), resulting in a 7-h postprandial PG greater than Hum-R (9.4 +/- 0.5 vs. 8.8 +/- 0.6 mmol/l) (all P < 0.05). Addition of NPH to Lispro increased the 2.5-to 7-h FIRI to 110 +/- 11 pmol/l and decreased the 3.25- to 7-h PG to 7.7 +/- 0.8 pmol/l, resulting in 0- to 7-h PG (7.3 +/- 0.3 mmol/l) lower than after Hum-R + NPH (7.9 +/- 0.5 pmol/l) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: At meals, in order for Lispro to improve postprandial blood glucose not only at 2-h, but also over a 7-h period in C-peptide-negative IDDM, basal insulin must be optimally replaced.

Long-term intensive insulin therapy in IDDM: effects on HbA1c, risk for severe and mild hypoglycaemia, status of counterregulation and awareness of hypoglycaemia.

UNLABELLED: The present studies were designed to assess the percentage of HbA1c, frequency, and awareness of hypoglycaemia (H) during long-term intensive therapy (IT) of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). From 1981 to 1994, 112 IDDM patients were on IT. HbA1c was 7.17 +/- 0.16% (non-diabetic subjects 3.8-5.5%), the frequency of severe H 0.01 +/- 0.009 episodes/patient-year, frequency of mild symptomatic H 35.6 +/- 2.9 episodes/patient-year. IDDM patients with HbA1c < or = 5.5% (Group I, n = 10), between 6.1-7.0% (Group II, n = 12), and > or = 7.6% (Group III, n = 11) were studied to assess responses of counterregulatory hormones, symptoms and cognitive function during experimental, stepped H. Compared to 18 non-diabetic subjects, Group I exhibited high thresholds (plasma glucose had to decrease more than normal to evoke responses), and impaired responses of adrenaline, unawareness of H and delayed onset of cognitive dysfunction at the lowest glycaemic plateau (2.3 mmol/l). Group II had normal thresholds and responses, whereas Group III had low thresholds. Frequency of mild H was higher in Group I (54.5 +/- 1.9 episodes/patient-year) than in Group II and III (33.7 +/- 3.5 and 20.4 +/- 2.5 episodes/patient-year, respectively, p < 0.001) and correlated with percentage of HbA1c (r = -0.82). IN CONCLUSION: IT can maintain near-normal HbA1c and is compatible with low frequency of severe H. However, if HbA1c is less than 6.0%, mild, symptomatic H is excessively frequent and causes impaired counterregulation and H unawareness. Efforts should be made not only to maintain HbA1c < or = 7.0%, but also to prevent, recognize and reverse iatrogenic H unawareness during long-term IT of IDDM by maintaining HbA1c > 6.0%.

Long-term recovery from unawareness, deficient counterregulation and lack of cognitive dysfunction during hypoglycaemia, following institution of rational, intensive insulin therapy in IDDM.

Hypoglycaemia unawareness, is a major risk factor for severe hypoglycaemia and a contraindication to the therapeutic goal of near-normoglycaemia in IDDM. We tested two hypotheses, first, that hypoglycaemia unawareness is reversible as long as hypoglycaemia is meticulously prevented by careful intensive insulin therapy in patients with short and long IDDM duration, and that such a result can be maintained long-term. Second, that intensive insulin therapy which strictly prevents hypoglycaemia, can maintain long-term near-normoglycaemia. We studied 21 IDDM patients with hypoglycaemia unawareness and frequent mild/severe hypoglycaemia episodes while on "conventional" insulin therapy, and 20 nondiabetic control subjects. Neuroendocrine and symptom responses, and deterioration in cognitive function were assessed in a stepped hypoglycaemia clamp before, and again after 2 weeks, 3 months and 1 year of either intensive insulin therapy which meticulously prevented hypoglycaemia (based on physiologic insulin replacement and continuous education, experimental group, EXP, n = 16), or maintenance of the original "conventional" therapy (control group, CON, n = 5). At entry to the study, all 21 IDDM-patients had subnormal neuroendocrine and symptom responses, and less deterioration of cognitive function during hypoglycaemia. After intensive insulin therapy in EXP, the frequency of hypoglycaemia decreased from 0.5 +/- 0.05 to 0.045 +/- 0.02 episodes/patient-day; HbA1c increased from 5.83 +/- 0.18 to 6.94 +/- 0.13% (range in non-diabetic subjects 3.8-5.5%) over a 1-year period; all counterregulatory hormone and symptom responses to hypoglycaemia improved between 2 weeks and 3 months with the exception of glucagon which improved at 1 year; and cognitive function deteriorated further as early as 2 weeks (p < 0.05). The improvement in responses was maintained at 1 year. The improvement in plasma adrenaline and symptom responses inversely correlated with IDDM duration. In contrast, in CON, neither frequency of hypoglycaemia, nor neuroendocrine responses to hypoglycaemia improved. Thus, meticulous prevention of hypoglycaemia by intensive insulin therapy reverses hypoglycaemia unawareness even in patients with long-term IDDM, and is compatible with long-term near-normoglycaemia. Because carefully conducted intensive insulin therapy reduces, not increases the frequency of moderate/severe hypoglycaemia, intensive insulin therapy should be extended to the majority of IDDM patients in whom it is desirable to prevent/delay the onset/progression of microvascular complications.

Relative roles of insulin and hypoglycaemia on induction of neuroendocrine responses to, symptoms of, and deterioration of cognitive function in hypoglycaemia in male and female humans.

To assess the relative roles of insulin and hypoglycaemia on induction of neuroendocrine responses, symptoms and deterioration of cognitive function (12 cognitive tests) during progressive decreases in plasma glucose, and to quantitate glycaemic thresholds, 22 normal, non-diabetic subjects (11 males, 11 females) were studied on four occasions: prolonged fast (n = 8, saline euglycaemia study, SA-EU), stepped hypoglycaemia (plasma glucose plateaus of 4.3, 3.7, 3 and 2.3 mmol/l) or euglycaemia during insulin infusion at 1 and 2 mU.kg-1.min-1 (n = 22, high-insulin hypoglycaemia and euglycaemia studies, HI-INS-HYPO and HI-INS-EU, respectively), and stepped hypoglycaemia during infusion of insulin at 0.35 mU.kg-1.min-1 (n = 9, low-insulin hypoglycaemia study, LO-INS-HYPO). Insulin per se (SA-EU vs HI-INS-EU), suppressed plasma glucagon (approximately 20%) and pancreatic polypeptide (approximately 30%), whereas it increased plasma noradrenaline (approximately 10%, p < 0.05). Hypoglycaemia per se (HI-INS-HYPO vs HI-INS-EU) induced responses of counterregulatory hormones (CR-HORM), symptoms and deteriorated cognitive function. With the exception of suppression of endogenous insulin secretion, which had the lowest glycaemic threshold of 4.44 +/- 0.06 mmol/l, pancreatic polypeptide, glucagon, growth hormone, adrenaline and cortisol had similar glycaemic thresholds (approximately 3.8-3.6 mmol/l); noradrenaline (3.1 +/- 0.0 mmol/l), autonomic (3.05 +/- 0.06 mmol/l) and neuroglycopenic (3.05 +/- 0.05 mmol/l) symptoms had higher thresholds. All 12 tests of cognitive function deteriorated at a glycaemic threshold of 2.45 +/- 0.06 mmol/l, but 7 out of 12 tests were already abnormal at a glycaemic threshold of 2.89 +/- 0.06 mmol/l. Although all CR-HORM had a similar glycaemic threshold, the lag time of response (the time required for a given parameter to increase) of glucagon (15 +/- 1 min) and growth hormone (14 +/- 3 min) was shorter than adrenaline (19 +/- 3 min) and cortisol (39 +/- 4 min) (p < 0.05). With the exception of glucagon (which was suppressed) and noradrenaline (which was stimulated), insulin per se (HI-INS-HYPO vs LO-INS-HYPO) did not affect the responses of CR-HORM, and did not influence the symptoms or the cognitive function during hypoglycaemia. Despite lower responses of glucagon, adrenaline and growth hormone (but not thresholds) in females than males, females were less insulin sensitive than males during stepped hypoglycaemia.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and glucose counterregulation following subcutaneous injection of the monomeric insulin analogue [Lys(B28),Pro(B29)] in IDDM.

The aim of these studies was to compare the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, counterregulatory hormone and symptom responses, as well as cognitive function during hypoglycaemia induced by s.c. injection of 0.15 IU/kg of regular human insulin (HI) and the monomeric insulin analogue [Lys(B28),Pro (B29)] (MI) in insulin-dependent-diabetic (IDDM) subjects. In these studies glucose was infused whenever needed to prevent decreases in plasma glucose below 3 mmol/l. After MI, plasma insulin increased earlier to a peak (60 vs 90 min) which was greater than after HI (294 +/- 24 vs 255 +/- 24 pmol/l), and plasma glucose decreased earlier to a 3 mmol/l plateau (60 vs 120 min) (p < 0.05). The amount of glucose infused to prevent plasma glucose falling below 3 mmol/l was approximately three times greater after MI than HI (293 +/- 26 vs 90 +/- 25 mumol.kg-1 x 60-375 min-1, p < 0.05). After MI, hepatic glucose production was more suppressed (0.7 +/- 1 vs 5.9 +/- 0.54 mumol.kg-1.min-1) and glucose utilization was less suppressed than after HI (11.6 +/- 0.65 vs 9.1 +/- 0.11 mumol.kg-1.min-1) (p < 0.05). Similarly, plasma NEFA, glycerol, and beta-OH-butyrate were more suppressed after MI than HI (p < 0.05), whereas plasma lactate increased only after MI, but not after HI. Responses of counterregulatory hormones, symptoms and deterioration in cognitive function during plasma glucose plateau of 3 mmol/l were superimposable after MI and HI (p = NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Meticulous prevention of hypoglycemia normalizes the glycemic thresholds and magnitude of most of neuroendocrine responses to, symptoms of, and cognitive function during hypoglycemia in intensively treated patients with short-term IDDM.

To test the hypothesis that hypoglycemia unawareness is largely secondary to recurrent therapeutic hypoglycemia in IDDM, we assessed neuroendocrine and symptom responses and cognitive function in 8 patients with short-term IDDM (7 yr) and hypoglycemia unawareness. Patients were assessed during a stepped hypoglycemic clamp, before and after 2 wk and 3 mo of meticulous prevention of hypoglycemia, which resulted in a decreased frequency of hypoglycemia (0.49 +/- 0.05 to 0.045 +/- 0.03 episodes/patient-day) and an increase in HbA1c (5.8 +/- 0.3 to 6.9 +/- 0.2%) (P < 0.05). We also studied 12 nondiabetic volunteer subjects. At baseline, lower than normal symptom and neuroendocrine responses occurred at lower than normal plasma glucose, and cognitive function deteriorated only marginally during hypoglycemia. After 2 wk of hypoglycemia prevention, the magnitude of symptom and neuroendocrine responses (with the exception of glucagon and norepinephrine) nearly normalized, and cognitive function deteriorated at the same glycemic threshold and to the same extent as in nondiabetic volunteer subjects. At 3 mo, the glycemic thresholds of symptom and neuroendocrine responses normalized, and surprisingly, some of the responses of glucagon recovered. We concluded that hypoglycemia unawareness in IDDM is largely reversible and that intensive insulin therapy and a program of intensive education may substantially prevent hypoglycemia and at the same time maintain the glycemic targets of intensive insulin therapy, at least in patients with IDDM of short duration.

Improved insulin action and glycemic control after long-term angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in subjects with arterial hypertension and type II diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor captopril on insulin sensitivity in subjects with type II diabetes and arterial hypertension. The chronic effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on insulin-sensitive individuals are presently controversial. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Sixteen subjects, with type II diabetes (on diet and/or diet plus oral hypoglycemic agents) and arterial hypertension, were studied. During a 1-mo run-in period no antihypertensive drugs were administered, but oral hypoglycemic agents were continued in subjects already in therapy. The subjects were then randomly assigned to two 3-mo treatment periods, with either captopril or placebo (single blind, cross-over design). At the end of each treatment period, insulin sensitivity was assessed by means of a euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp (2 sequential steps, 2-h each, insulin infusion 0.25 and 1 mU.kg-1.min-1, steps 1 and 2, respectively), combined with infusion of [3-3H]glucose (for calculation of hepatic glucose output and peripheral glucose utilization, rates of glucose disappearance), and indirect calorimetry (for calculation of glucose oxidation, nonoxidative glucose metabolism, and lipid oxidation). The percentage of HbA1c was measured to assess long-term glycemic control. RESULTS: Comparing data at the end of placebo and captopril treatment, captopril resulted in: lower blood pressure (systolic 154 +/- 2 vs. 163 +/- 3 mmHg and diastolic 93 +/- 2 vs. 101 +/- 2 mmHg); greater insulin sensitivity in hyperglycemic conditions (total amount of insulin infused and time of insulin infusion required to reach euglycemia, 1.73 +/- 0.54 vs. 2.08 +/- 0.60 U and 58 +/- 8 vs. 70 +/- 11 min, captopril and placebo, respectively, P < 0.05); greater insulin sensitivity in euglycemic conditions at liver level (hepatic glucose output 4.11 +/- 0.55 vs. 5.2 +/- 0.4 mumol.kg-1.min-1, step 1 of the clamp), muscle level (rates of glucose disappearance 26.1 +/- 2.3 vs. 23.8 +/- 2.1 mumol.kg-1.min-1 step 2 of the clamp), primarily attributable to approximately 29% increase in nonoxidative glucose metabolism, and adipose tissue level (plasma free fatty acid 0.185 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.24 +/- 0.02 mM and lipid oxidation 1.9 +/- 0.3 vs. 2.21 +/- 0.04 mumol.kg-1.min-1 in step 1); and lower HbA1c (6.7 +/- 0.2 vs. 7.3 +/- 0.2%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term captopril administration in type II diabetic subjects improves insulin sensitivity in the postprandial state, not in the fasting state, and improves glycemic control.

Mechanisms of arterial hypotension after therapeutic dose of subcutaneous insulin in diabetic autonomic neuropathy.

To assess whether a therapeutic, subcutaneous injection of insulin exerts hemodynamic effects in subjects with IDDM, 0.2 U/kg regular insulin was injected subcutaneously in 17 IDDM subjects: 6 without autonomic neuropathy, 7 with autonomic neuropathy and othostatic hypotension, and 4 with autonomic neuropathy but without orthostatic hypotension. Plasma glucose was maintained at approximately 8.5 mM throughout the studies. Mean blood pressure, plasma norepinephrine concentration, forearm vascular resistances, and calf venous volume were measured before and 120 min after subcutaneous insulin, in the supine position and 5 min after standing. Supine plasma volume ([125I]albumin and [131I]albumin) was measured before and after subcutaneous injection of insulin. In all three groups, subcutaneous insulin activated the sympathetic nervous system (approximately 30% increase in norepinephrine concentration). In subjects with IDDM but without autonomic neuropathy, standing forearm vascular resistance increased approximately 70% less after subcutaneous insulin, but supine or standing mean blood pressure did not decrease. In contrast, in subjects with IDDM with autonomic neuropathy and orthostatic hypotension, subcutaneous insulin decreased supine mean blood pressure (from 99 +/- 3 to 94 +/- 5 mmHg) and exaggerated the standing decrement in mean blood pressure (24 +/- 3 vs. 19 +/- 2 mmHg) (P < 0.05). This was associated with a decrease in forearm vascular resistance. Similarly, in subjects with IDDM with autonomic neuropathy without orthostatic hypotension, subcutaneously injected insulin decreased supine mean blood pressure (from 95 +/- 2 to 89 +/- 2 mmHg) and standing mean blood pressure by 8 +/- 1 mmHg (P < 0.05). Calf venous volume was not affected by subcutaneous insulin in any of the three groups. Plasma volume did not change after subcutaneous insulin in subjects with IDDM without autonomic neuropathy, whereas it decreased in those with autonomic neuropathy and orthostatic hypotension from 1.692 +/- 0.069 to 1.610 +/- 0.064 L/m2, without orthostatic hypotension from 1.631 +/- 0.027 to 1.593 +/- 0.024 L/m2, P < 0.05). No hemodynamic effects were observed when subjects with IDDM were restudied in a control experiment where placebo (distilled water), not insulin, was injected subcutaneously. In conclusion, therapeutic doses of subcutaneous insulin activate the sympathetic nervous system; decrease blood pressure in subjects with IDDM with autonomic neuropathy, but not in those without, primarily by decreasing arterial vascular resistances and plasma volume; and have no effects of capacitance vessels. Thus, in subjects with IDDM without autonomic neuropathy, greater activation of sympathetic nervous system after subcutaneous injection of insulin prevents orthostatic hypotension.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

ACE-inhibition increases hepatic and extrahepatic sensitivity to insulin in patients with type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension.

To assess the effects of ACE-inhibition on insulin action in Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus associated with essential hypertension, 12 patients with Type 2 diabetes (on diet and oral hypoglycaemic agents) and arterial hypertension were examined on two occasions, in a single blind, cross-over study after two days of treatment with either captopril or a placebo. The study consisted of a euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp (two sequential steps of insulin infusion at the rates of 0.25 mU.kg-1.min-1 and 1 mU.kg-1.min-1, 2 h each step), combined with an infusion of 3-3H-glucose to measure the rate of hepatic glucose production and that of peripheral glucose utilization. The results show that blood pressure was lower after captopril (sitting, systolic 148 +/- 5 mm Hg, diastolic 89 +/- 2 mm Hg) compared to placebo (155 +/- 6 and 94 +/- 2 mm Hg) (p less than 0.05). Captopril treatment resulted in a more suppressed hepatic glucose production (2.7 +/- 0.4 vs 4.94 +/- 0.55 mumol.kg-1.min-1), and a lower plasma non-esterified fatty acid concentration (0.143 +/- 0.05 vs 0.200 +/- 0.05 mmol/l) (captopril vs placebo, p less than 0.05) at the end of the first step of insulin infusion (estimated portal plasma insulin concentration 305 +/- 28 pmol/l); and in a greater glucose utilization (36.5 +/- 5.1 vs 28 +/- 3.6 mumol.kg-1.min-1, p less than 0.001) at the end of the second step of insulin infusion (arterial plasma insulin concentration of 604 +/- 33 pmol/l).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)