Lupus Erythematosus Tumidus Misdiagnosed as Erythema Nodosum from Coccidioidomycosis.

Introduction: Lupus erythematosus tumidus (LET) is a rare photosensitive dermatosis that is categorized as intermittent cutaneous lupus erythematosus. It shares clinical similarities and histopathological features with other skin disorders, such as erythema nodosum, lymphocytic infiltrate of Jessner, and reticular erythematous mucinosis, thus making diagnosis quite challenging. We present a patient with LET whose diagnosis was confirmed after seeing several doctors. Case Presentation: A 52-year-old Hispanic female presented with tender erythematous nodules on her thighs for approximately 1 month. She was suspected of having erythema nodosum secondary to coccidioidomycosis and was prescribed fluconazole 200 mg for 30 days but showed no improvement. However, histopathological and direct immunofluorescence tests later confirmed a diagnosis of LET. The patient was treated with hydroxychloroquine, and the lesions improved remarkably after 2 weeks. Conclusion: LET is a rare dermatosis that closely resembles other dermatologic conditions such as erythema nodosum, lymphocytic infiltrate of Jessner, and reticular erythematous mucinosis. Diagnosis based on clinical features alone should be avoided, and ideally, treatment should only be initiated after confirmatory histopathological testing.

Abdominal cocoon: A rare case report of a small bowel obstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis (SEP), or abdominal cocoon, is a remarkably rare entity. It consists of a fibrous layer or cocoon-like sac encasing, in most cases, the small bowel. The lack of specific symptoms makes preoperative diagnosis challenging. CASE PRESENTATION: A 50-year-old patient, with no history of abdominal surgery or medical diseases, was admitted for symptoms of small bowel obstruction. On examination, the patient was underweight with a BMI of 18 kg/m2. Vital signs were stable. His abdomen was mildly distended and soft. Abdominal CT scan showed signs in favor of a left paraduodenal hernia with incarcerated small bowel loops. Intraoperatively, the small bowels were encapsulated in a cocoon-like structure formed by thick fibrous tissue associated with multiple adhesions. Careful adhesiolysis with complete resection of the membrane was performed. The postoperative course was uneventful. One year later, the patient was symptom-free. DISCUSSION: SEP is thought to be a persistent inflammatory disorder due to a cause that remains unidentified. It is divided into two categories based on its etiology: primary and secondary. The most common mode of SEP revelation is bowel obstruction. Because there is no clear consensus on SEP management, the therapeutic approach typically follows the management strategy of bowel obstruction. CONCLUSION: SEP is an uncommon cause of bowel obstruction. Preoperative detection can be challenging in the absence of pathognomonic signs. Treatment is based on surgery, specifically entailing complete excision of the cocoon and adhesiolysis.

Iatrogenic incarcerated diaphragmatic hernia following laparoscopic resection of a diaphragmatic cystic lymphangioma: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Incarcerated iatrogenic right diaphragm hernia stands as a rare occurrence. Swift diagnosis and timely management are imperative. This article presents a particularly uncommon case of a right diaphragmatic hernia resulting from a neglected defect following the resection of a diaphragmatic lymphangioma and sheds light on the pitfalls that may lead to such a post-operative event. PRESENTATION OF CASE: Our surgical ward admitted a 36-year-old patient presenting symptoms indicative of bowel obstruction. Four months earlier, the patient had undergone laparoscopic resection of a lymphangioma located in the right dome of the diaphragm. Thoracic auscultation yielded hyperactive bowel sounds at the lower lung field and the right costophrenic angle. Abdominal distention was observed without any signs of peritoneal irritation. A thoracic and abdominal CT scan provided confirmation of a right diaphragmatic hernia. Subsequently, an immediate laparotomy was performed. The right colic hepatic flexure was released, and the diaphragmatic breach was sutured. The postoperative course was uneventful. DISCUSSION: Iatrogenic diaphragmatic hernia remains a possible complication of this surgery. It could occur even on the right side where the liver has a cushioning effect. Incarcerated diaphragmatic hernia is a surgical emergency that should be operated on as quickly as possible. A systematic check of the diaphragm's integrity at the end of the surgical procedure could prevent such complications. CONCLUSION: While surgical techniques and laparoscopic instrumentation have witnessed significant advancements in recent years, achieving proficiency and the precise execution of surgical techniques remain of utmost importance.

Novel Application of Hydrodissection in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Gangrenous Gallbladders.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for gangrenous gallbladders (GGBs) can be challenging and represent a significant number of LC cases, necessitating more efficacious surgical techniques. Currently, the standard treatment for GGBs is blunt dissection which can have high iatrogenic complication rates. To our knowledge, this is the first large retrospective study conducted on the novel application of hydrodissection (HD) in LCs for GGBs. METHODS: In this retrospective study of 386 LCs, data were collected for patient demographics, medical comorbidities, operating time (OT), anesthesia time (AT), length of stay (LOS), estimated blood loss, conversion to open procedures, 30-day readmissions, and mortality. Patients were categorized into four groups: (1) Vyas employing HD for GGBs (VHG), (2) non-Vyas group of five surgeons not employing HD for GGBs (NVG), (3) Vyas treating non-GGBs, and (4) non-Vyas group of five surgeons treating non-GGBs. Control groups were age-matched and sex-matched. Statistical analysis used descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U testing, and chi-squared testing (α = 0.05). RESULTS: This study demonstrated significantly decreased (P < 0.05) OT (P = 0.001), AT (P < 0.001), LOS (P = 0.015), and conversion to open procedures (P = 0.047) between the VHG and NVG groups, with HD reducing OT by 35.5% compared to blunt dissection. This study did not demonstrate significantly decreased (P > 0.05) estimated blood loss (P = 0.185) and 30-day readmissions (P = 0.531) between the VHG and NVG groups, but they were trending toward significant. There were no mortalities in this study. CONCLUSIONS: HD is associated with improved surgical outcomes of LCs for GGBs demonstrated by reduced OT, AT, LOS, and conversion to open procedures. Further multi-institutional studies are needed to validate HD implementation and further dissemination.

Mepolizumab as a Potential Protective Factor of COVID-19 Mortality: A Case Report of Chronic Bronchitis and Asthma in an Elderly Patient.

BACKGROUND Patients with multiple comorbidities who are infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have a higher risk of mortality. However, treatment with mepolizumab may be a key factor in counteracting the risk of these comorbidities. We present a patient who had an uneventful recovery from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), despite having 5 independent risk factors for severe disease and increased mortality. CASE REPORT A 75-year-old man with a long-standing history of asthma, chronic bronchitis, coronary artery disease, and hypertension presented to the Emergency Department in November 2020 with a 4-day history of fever, chills, shortness of breath, cough, and fatigue. Six months prior to this presentation, the patient was hospitalized for severe chronic bronchitis and acute exacerbation of asthma. His medications included mepolizumab, aclidinium, ramipril, diltiazem, aspirin, albuterol sulfate, and micronized budesonide/micronized formoterol fumarate dihydrate. Physical examination was unremarkable, except for cardiopulmonary distress. Laboratory tests showed leucocytosis. His chest X-ray revealed infiltrates and interstitial edema in the lower lung fields. A PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 was positive. COVID-19 pneumonia was diagnosed, and the patient was admitted to the hospital, where he was treated with acetaminophen, amoxicillin, dexamethasone, and supplemental oxygen. The patient remained stable and was discharged from the hospital the following day. He was free of all symptoms after 21 days. CONCLUSIONS This case of a 75-year-old man who presented with mild COVID-19 supports the findings from other reports of improvement in clinical outcomes for some patients with asthma who received treatment with mepolizumab.

Endometriosis and COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Endometriosis is defined as ectopic endometrial tissues dispersed outside the endometrium. This can cause disruption in hormonal and immunological processes, which may increase susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Worsening of endometriosis symptoms may occur as a result of this infection. The aim of our review was to estimate the pooled prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in endometriosis patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. MEDLINE, Science Direct, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases were searched, using the keywords: (endometriosis) AND (COVID-19 OR SARS-CoV-2). Forest plots and pooled estimates were created using the Open Meta Analyst software. After screening 474 articles, 19 studies met the eligibility criteria for the systematic review, and 15 studies were included in the meta-analyses. A total of 17,799 patients were analyzed. The pooled prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in endometriosis patients was 7.5%. Pooled estimates for the health impacts were 47.2% for decreased access to medical care, 49.3% increase in dysmenorrhea, 75% increase in anxiety, 59.4% increase in depression, and 68.9% increase in fatigue. Endometriosis patients were undeniably impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, which caused the worsening of symptoms such as dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, anxiety, depression, and fatigue.

Endometriosis and irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analyses.

Objective: To estimate the pooled odds ratio of endometriosis and irritable bowel syndrome, and to estimate the pooled prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome in patients with endometriosis. Data sources: Using Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Science Direct, ClinicalTrials.gov, Web of Science, and CINAHL, we conducted a systematic literature search through October 2021, using the key terms "endometriosis" and "irritable bowel syndrome." Articles had to be published in English or Spanish. No restriction on geographical location was applied. Methods of study selection: The following eligibility criteria were applied: full-text original articles; human studies; studies that investigated the association between endometriosis and irritable bowel syndrome. Two investigators screened and reviewed the studies. A total of 1,776 studies were identified in 6 separate databases. After screening and applying the eligibility criteria, a total of 17 studies were included for analyses. The meta-analysis of association between endometriosis and irritable bowel syndrome included 11 studies, and the meta-analysis on the prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome in endometriosis included 6 studies. Tabulation integration and results: Overall 96,119 subjects were included in the main meta-analysis (11 studies) for endometriosis and irritable bowel syndrome, with 18,887 endometriosis patients and 77,171 controls. The odds of irritable bowel syndrome were approximately 3 times higher among patients with endometriosis compared with healthy controls (odds ratio 2.97; 95% confidence interval, 2.17 - 4.06). Similar results were obtained after subgroup analyses by endometriosis diagnosis, irritable bowel syndrome diagnostic criteria, and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale scores. Six studies reported prevalence rates of irritable bowel syndrome in women with endometriosis, ranging from 10.6 to 52%. The pooled prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome in women with endometriosis was 23.4% (95% confidence interval, 9.7 - 37.2). Conclusion: Patients with endometriosis have an approximately threefold increased risk of developing irritable bowel syndrome. Development and recent update of Rome criteria has evolved the diagnosis of IBS, potential bias should still be considered as there are no specific tests available for diagnosis. Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/displa y_record.php?ID=CRD42018080611], identifier [CRD42018080611].

Academic and Social Impact of Menstrual Disturbances in Female Medical Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The stressful academic schedule of medical students poses an obvious challenge to their daily lifestyle. Psychosomatic discomfort poses a significant risk for inaccurate self-medication for ameliorating menstrual complications and feeling better, thus directly impacting personal and academic wellbeing. OBJECTIVE: The impact of menstrual disturbances on academic life is not extensively explored. Therefore, the primary objective of this research was to probe the prevalence of menstrual disturbances and assess the academic and social impact. Finally, the authors provide an overview of pharmacological and other interventions students adopt to reduce clinical symptoms. METHODS: A database search was conducted from the year 2016 till September 2021 for the studies reporting the prevalence of menstrual disorders in all geographic locations of the world. Keywords used for searching databases included "menstrual disturbances" and "medical students," "prevalence" OR "symptoms" of "Premenstrual syndrome" OR "Premenstrual dysphoric disorder" OR "Dysmenorrhea" in medical students. Prospero Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) protocols were followed. The protocol was registered in the International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO), the Center for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York (CRD42021277962). The quality of the methodologies used in selected studies was evaluated by a modified version of Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS). RESULTS: Initially, 1527 articles were available. After a review, 26 papers were selected for analysis. A total of 25 citations were identified for quantitative analyses, out of which 16 studies reported Pre-menstrual syndrome, 7 reported Pre-menstrual dysphoric disorder, and 13 articles reported dysmenorrhea. The pooled prevalence of Pre-menstrual syndrome was 51.30%, Pre-menstrual dysphoric disorder was 17.7%, and dysmenorrhea was 72.70%. Most common associated lifestyle factors were stress, excessive caffeine intake and lack of exercise. Painkillers, hot packs and hot beverages were amongst the common measures taken by the students to relieve their symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The current situation calls for action to accommodate students' needs and bridge the social gap regarding menstrual health. Proactive measures by medical educators and stakeholders are required for an inclusive, accommodating educational environment which will minimize the gender discrepancy in academic satisfaction and professional life.

Randomized cross-over study and a qualitative analysis comparing virtual microscopy and light microscopy for learning undergraduate histopathology.

Background: Virtual microscopy (VM) use in teaching and learning is increasing worldwide. However, there is a paucity of information comparing it to light microscopy (LM) in learning undergraduate histopathology. We investigated whether VM or LM had a higher impact on student learning and performance in histopathology. In addition, we investigated whether students preferred VM over LM, and whether VM use provided a platform to fulfill the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core competencies. Materials and Methods: We used a sequential exploratory mixed method study design. A qualitative phase inquiring about student preference for VM or LM was followed by a randomized cross-over study. Student preference was measured by an online survey based on a Likert scale. In the cross-over study, students were randomized to either the VM or the LM arm, and their mean scores in standardized exams were compared after using VM and LM. Results: A total of 152 students completed the qualitative study and a total of 64 students participated in the cross-over study. Eighty-three percent (83%) of the students preferred to use VM over LM. Students who used VM scored significantly (P < 0.001) higher [(87.1% vs. 72.4%) and (85.3% vs. 76.1%)], respectively, in both phases of the cross-over study compared to those who used LM. Conclusions: Using VM to learn histopathology has significantly increased student learning and performance compared to using LM.

Providers role in colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To examine predictors of provider recommendations for colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: We examined proportions of patients without prior screening for colonoscopy and their willingness to get a colonoscopy if recommended by a healthcare provider. RESULTS: The rate of CRC screening with a colonoscopy within the recommended guidelines was 35%; provider recommendation rate for colonoscopy screening was 34.9%; and never-screened patients would receive a colonoscopy 78% when recommended by a provider. Provider recommendation was the best predictor for receiving a screening colonoscopy (OR 4.19; 95% CI, 1.91-9.22, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Physician recommendation for colonoscopy is the most effective strategy to promote screening colonoscopy in the US, but only one third of eligible patients recall such counseling.

Can the inpatient hospital setting be a golden opportunity to improve colon cancer screening rates in the United States?

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the United States. Despite efforts to increase colorectal cancer screening, the rate of compliance with the recommended screening remains relatively suboptimal according the American Cancer Society (53%). PURPOSE: To assess whether the time of hospitalization is a suitable opportunity for patients to receive counseling and for recruiting patients to undergo screening colonoscopy for colon cancer. METHOD: In 2009, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of hospitalized adults age 50 to 80 years in order to assess their responses on a modified version of the Health Information National Trends Survey. We conducted χ(2) analyses on these data to examine the differences in patients' knowledge of colorectal cancer screening and prior adherence to screening guidelines and to assess whether they would be willing to undergo a screening in the near future if prompted by their physicians. RESULTS: We enrolled a total of 332 participants to complete the study questionnaire. About 94% of the subjects had heard about colon cancer, and 83.4% had heard of any screening tests to detect colorectal cancer. About 66% of subjects reported the colonoscopy to be the most effective screening test for colon cancer. Approximately 55% of the total sample group adhered to recommended screening guidelines for colon cancer using the colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: The time of hospitalization is a potential "golden opportunity" to counsel patients and promote colon cancer screening.