The human antibody response to pneumococcal capsular polysaccharides is dependent on the CD40-CD40 ligand interaction.

Protection against infections with Streptococcus pneumoniae is mediated by antibodies against the capsular polysaccharides (caps-PS). Here we show that in in vitro experiments CD4+ T lymphocytes stimulate and CD8+ T lymphocytes inhibit the human anti-caps-PS antibody response. Using antagonistic anti-CD40 and antagonistic anti-CD40 ligand (CD40L) monoclonal antibodies, we showed that the CD4+ T lymphocyte-mediated stimulation is dependent on the CD40-CD40L interaction. The role of CD40L was further illustrated by the observation that CD4+ T lymphocytes obtained from a patient with hyper-IgM syndrome were unable to enhance the immune response to caps-PS. Furthermore, CD4+ T lymphocytes from cord blood, which did not express CD40L in response to stimulation with caps-PS, failed to stimulate the antibody response of adult B lymphocytes to caps-PS. These in vitro findings were confirmed by in vivo experiments in which SCID/SCID mice were reconstituted with human mononuclear cells. Furthermore, we showed that caps-PS induce production of IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, and IFN-gamma, and that this enhanced production was inhibited by blocking the CD40-CD40L interaction. This is the first demonstration that the human immune response to caps-PS, which is markedly regulated by T lymphocytes, is dependent on the CD40-CD40L interaction.

Prevention of kidney allograft rejection using anti-CD40 and anti-CD86 in primates.

BACKGROUND: Costimulation blockade has been proposed to induce allograft tolerance. We combined an antagonist anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody (mAb) with an antagonist anti-CD86 mAb in a rhesus monkey kidney allograft model. We chose this combination because it leaves CD80-CD152 signaling unimpaired, allowing for the down-regulatory effect of CD152 signaling to take place through this pathway. METHODS: Rhesus monkeys underwent transplantation with a major histocompatibility complex-mismatched kidney. One group of animals received anti-CD40 alone, and a second group received the combination of anti-CD40 and anti-CD86, twice weekly for 56 days. RESULTS: Three animals with low levels of anti-CD40 rejected the transplanted kidney while still receiving treatment. Three animals with high levels of anti-CD40 rejected at days 91, 134, and 217 with signs of chronic rejection. Animals treated with the combination of anti-CD40 and anti-CD86 mAbs rejected their kidneys at days 61, 75, and 78, shortly after cessation of treatment. Two animals were killed on days 71 and 116 with a blocked ureter. These animals developed virtually no signs of tubulitis or infiltration during treatment and no donor-specific alloantibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Both treatment protocols prevented rejection for the duration of the treatment in most animals. Blocking costimulation by anti-CD40 or by anti-CD40 plus anti-CD86 may be an effective method to prevent graft rejection and may obviate the need for other immunosuppressive drugs, especially in the immediate posttransplantation period.

Selective requirement for CD40-CD154 in drug-induced type 1 versus type 2 responses to trinitrophenyl-ovalbumin.

CD154 is transiently expressed by activated T cells and interacts with CD40 on B cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, and monocytes. This costimulatory receptor-ligand couple seems decisive in Ag-driven immune responses but may be differentially involved in type 1 vs type 2 responses. We studied the importance of CD40-CD154 in both responses using the reporter Ag popliteal lymph node assay in which selectively acting drugs generate clearly polarized type 1 (streptozotocin) or type 2 (D-penicillamine, diphenylhydantoin) responses to a constant coinjected Ag in the same mouse strain. Treatment of mice with anti-CD154 reduced characteristic immunological parameters in type 2 responses (B and CD4(+) T cell proliferation, IgG1 and IgE Abs, and IL-4 secretion) and only slightly affected the type 1 response (small decrease in IFN-gamma production, influx of CD11c(+) and F4/80(+) cells, and prevention of architectural disruption of the lymph node, but no effect on IgG2a Ab and TNF-alpha secretion or B and CD4(+) T cell proliferation). The findings indicate that the CD40-CD154 costimulatory interaction is a prerequisite in drug-induced type 2 responses and is only marginally involved in type 1 responses. The observed expression patterns of CD80 and CD86 on different APC (B cells in type 2 and dendritic cells in type 1) may be responsible for this discrepancy.