ABSTRACT
Performance testing of gamma cameras and single photon computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) systems is not subject to regulatory requirements across states and territories in Australia. Internationally recognised testing standards from organisations such as the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) describe methodologies for recommended tests. However, variations exist in suggested quality control (QC) schedules from professional bodies such as the Australia and New Zealand Society of Nuclear Medicine (ANZSNM). In this study, a survey was conducted to benchmark current QC programs across a selected sample of eight standalone and networked Australian public hospitals. Vendor-specific flood-field uniformity (intrinsic or extrinsic/system) verification without photomultiplier (PMT) tuning and CT QC were performed at all sites. Weekly and monthly PMT tuning followed by intrinsic flood-field verifications were performed at most sites. At least half of the sites performed monthly centre of rotation (COR) offset verifications. SPECT/CT alignment calibrations and verifications were undertaken by service engineers at all sites, and periodic verifications were performed by local staff at varying frequencies. Variations were observed for other periodic QC tests such as spatial resolution and planar sensitivity. Similarly, variations were observed for tests specific to whole-body systems and SPECT systems. Most sites checked daily and periodic QC results against pass/fail criteria set by vendors. Additional analyses of the QC results, including trend analysis and periodic reviews, were not common practice. The lack of regulatory requirements is likely to have led to variations in QC tests that are generally either harder to perform or are more labour intensive.
