Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Front Pharmacol ; 12: 748798, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34675812

ABSTRACT

3',5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) is well-known for its diverse immunomodulatory properties, primarily inhibitory effects during T cell activation, proliferation, and production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. A decrease in cAMP levels, due to the hydrolyzing activity of phosphodiesterases (PDE), is favoring inflammatory responses. This can be prevented by selective PDE inhibitors, which makes PDEs important therapeutic targets for autoimmune disorders. In this study, we investigated the specific roles of PDE2A and PDE3B in the regulation of intracellular cAMP levels in different mouse T cell subsets. Unexpectedly, T cell receptor (TCR) activation led to a selective upregulation of PDE2A at the protein level in conventional T cells (Tcon), whereas no changes were detected in regulatory T cells (Treg). In contrast, protein expression of PDE3B was significantly higher in both non-activated and activated Tcon subsets as compared to Treg, with no changes upon TCR engagement. Live-cell imaging of T cells expressing a highly sensitive Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based biosensor, Epac1-camps, has enabled cAMP measurements in real time and revealed stronger responses to the PDE2A inhibitors in activated vs non-activated Tcon. Importantly, stimulation of intracellular cGMP levels with natriuretic peptides led to an increase of cAMP in non-activated and a decrease of cAMP in activated Tcon, suggesting that TCR activation changes the PDE3B-dependent positive to PDE2A-dependent negative cGMP/cAMP cross-talk. Functionally, this switch induced higher expression of early activation markers CD25 and CD69. This constitutes a potentially interesting feed-forward mechanism during autoimmune and inflammatory responses that may be exploited therapeutically.

2.
Circ Res ; 115(1): 55-67, 2014 Jun 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24786398

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: An exaggerated or persistent inflammatory activation after myocardial infarction (MI) leads to maladaptive healing and subsequent remodeling of the left ventricle. Foxp3(+) CD4(+) regulatory T cells (Treg cells) contribute to inflammation resolution. Therefore, Treg cells might influence cardiac healing post-MI. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to study the functional role of Treg cells in wound healing post-MI in a mouse model of permanent left coronary artery ligation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a model of genetic Treg-cell ablation (Foxp3(DTR) mice), we depleted the Treg-cell compartment before MI induction, resulting in aggravated cardiac inflammation and deteriorated clinical outcome. Mechanistically, Treg-cell depletion was associated with M1-like macrophage polarization, characterized by decreased expression of inflammation-resolving and healing-promoting factors. The phenotype of exacerbated cardiac inflammation and outcome in Treg-cell-ablated mice could be confirmed in a mouse model of anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody-mediated depletion. In contrast, therapeutic Treg-cell activation by superagonistic anti-CD28 monoclonal antibody administration 2 days after MI led to improved healing and survival. Compared with control animals, CD28-SA-treated mice showed increased collagen de novo expression within the scar, correlating with decreased rates of left ventricular ruptures. Therapeutic Treg-cell activation induced an M2-like macrophage differentiation within the healing myocardium, associated with myofibroblast activation and increased expression of monocyte/macrophage-derived proteins fostering wound healing. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that Treg cells beneficially influence wound healing after MI by modulating monocyte/macrophage differentiation. Moreover, therapeutic activation of Treg cells constitutes a novel approach to improve healing post-MI.


Subject(s)
Cell Differentiation , Forkhead Transcription Factors/physiology , Macrophages/cytology , Monocytes/cytology , Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/physiology , Wound Healing , Animals , Cell Polarity , Lymphocyte Activation , Macrophages/physiology , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Myeloid Cells/physiology , Myocardial Infarction/immunology , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/immunology
3.
Immunology ; 126(3): 354-62, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18759750

ABSTRACT

Oral tolerance promotes a generalized decrease in specific immune responsiveness to proteins previously encountered via the oral route. In addition, parenteral immunization with a tolerated protein also triggers a significant reduction in the primary responsiveness to a second unrelated antigen. This is generally explained by 'innocent bystander suppression', suggesting that the transient and episodic effects of inhibitory cytokines released by contact with the tolerated antigen would block responses to the second antigen. In disagreement with this view, we have previously shown that: (i) these inhibitory effects do not require concomitance or contiguity of the injections of the two proteins; (ii) that intravenous or intragastric exposures to the tolerated antigen are not inhibitory; and (iii) that the inhibitory effect, once triggered, persists in the absence of further contact with the tolerated protein, possibly by inhibition of secondary responsiveness (immunological memory). The present work confirms that immunological memory of the second unrelated antigen is hindered by exposure to the tolerated antigen and, in addition, shows that this exposure: (i) inhibits the inflammation triggered by an unrelated antigen through the double effect of inhibiting production of leucocytes in the bone marrow and blocking their migration to inflammed sites; and (ii) significantly blocks footpaw swelling triggered by carrageenan. Taken together, these results conclusively demonstrate that inhibitory effects of parenteral injection of tolerated antigens are much more general than suggested by the 'innocent bystander suppression' hypothesis.


Subject(s)
Hypersensitivity, Delayed/prevention & control , Immune Tolerance/immunology , Proteins/immunology , Administration, Oral , Animals , Antigens/administration & dosage , Bystander Effect , Carrageenan/immunology , Dinitrophenols/immunology , Eosinophilia/immunology , Eosinophilia/prevention & control , Female , Hypersensitivity, Delayed/immunology , Immunity, Cellular , Immunity, Mucosal , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Inbred DBA , Ovalbumin/immunology , Peritonitis/immunology , Peritonitis/prevention & control , Proteins/administration & dosage
4.
Clin Dev Immunol ; 13(2-4): 133-42, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17162356

ABSTRACT

Historically, immunology emerged as a biomedical science, concerned with host defense and production of anti-infectious vaccines. In the late 50s, selective theories were proposed and from then on, immunology has been based in a close association with the neo-Darwinian principles, such as random generation of variants (lymphocyte clones), selection by extrinsic factors (antigens) - and, more generally, on genetic determinism and functionalism. This association has had major consequences: (1) immunological jargon is full of "cognitive" metaphors, founded in the idea of "foreignness"; (2) the immune system is described with a random clonal origin, coupled to selection by random encounters; and (3) physiological events are virtually absent from immunological descriptions. In the present manuscript, we apply systemic notions to bring forth an explanation including systemic mechanisms able to generate immunological phenomena. We replace "randomness plus selection" and the notion of foreignness by a history of structural changes which are determined by the coherences of the system internal architecture at any given moment. The importance of this systemic way of seeing is that it explicitly attends to the organization that defines the immune system, within which it is possible to describe the conservative physiology of the immune system. Understanding immune physiology in a systemic way of seeing also suggests mechanisms underlying the origin of immunopathogeny and therefore suggests new insights to therapeutic approaches. However, if seriously acknowledged, this systemic/historic approach to immunology goes along with a global conceptual change which modifies virtually everything in the domain of biology, as suggested by Maturana.


Subject(s)
Autoantibodies/physiology , Immune System/physiology , Animals , Antigen-Antibody Reactions/immunology , Antigen-Antibody Reactions/physiology , Autoantibodies/immunology , Autoantigens/immunology , Autoantigens/physiology , Humans , Immune System/immunology , Immune Tolerance
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...