Cardiac Troponin-I and COVID-19: A Prognostic Tool for In-Hospital Mortality.

BACKGROUND: The number of fatalities due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is escalating with more than 800,000 deaths globally. The scientific community remains in urgent need of prognostic tools to determine the probability of survival in patients with COVID-19 and to determine the need for hospitalization. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 admitted to a tertiary center between March 2020 and July 2020. Patients age 18 years and older were stratified into two groups based on their troponin-I level in the first 24 h of admission (groups: elevated vs. normal). The aim of the study is to explore the utility of cardiac troponin-I level for early prognostication of patients with COVID-19. RESULTS: This cohort of 257 patients included 122/257 (47%) women with a mean age of 63 ± 17 years. Patients with an elevated troponin-I level were more likely to be older (77 ± 13 vs. 58 ± 16 years, P < 0.0001), have a history of hypertension (P < 0.0001), diabetes mellitus (P = 0.0019), atrial fibrillation or flutter (P = 0.0009), coronary artery disease (P < 0.0001), and chronic heart failure (P = 0.0011). Patients with an elevated troponin-I level in the first 24 h of admission were more likely to have higher in-hospital mortality (52% vs. 10%, P < 0.0001). Troponin-I level in the first 24 h of admission had a negative predictive value of 89.7% and a positive predictive value of 51.9% for all-cause in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Troponin-I elevation is commonly seen in patients with COVID-19 and is significantly associated with fatal outcomes. However, a normal troponin-I level in the first 24 h of admission had a high negative predictive value for all-cause in-hospital mortality, thereby predicting favorable survival at the time of discharge.

Implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign in Patients With Heart Failure: Gender-Specific Outcomes.

Background Limited data exist about the impact of gender-specific outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) who develop concomitant sepsis. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with HF who developed sepsis. Clinical outcomes, including in-hospital mortality, development of cardiogenic shock (CS), pulmonary edema requiring urgent intravenous diuretics (IVD), acute kidney injury (AKI), length of stay (LOS), and 30-day HF-related readmission, were evaluated in men vs. women. Results This cohort of 618 patients includes 272 (44%) women with a mean age of 75±14 years. Coronary artery disease (p<0.0001), diabetes mellitus (p=0.0213), stage ≥ 3 chronic kidney disease (p<0.0001), and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (p=0.0015) were more prevalent in men. The implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (i.e., intravenous (IV) crystalloids in the first six hours) was more aggressive in women (p=0.0192). There was no difference in in-hospital mortality (p=0.2385) between men and women. After adjusting for HF types, women with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) developed more episodes of pulmonary edema requiring urgent IVD (p=0.0389), while men with HFpEF had more CS requiring inotropes (p=0.0400) and a longer LOS (p=0.0434). Conversely, women with HFrEF were most likely to develop CS requiring inotropes (p=0.0132). Conclusion Women with HF who developed sepsis receive a more aggressive implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign than men, leading to more pulmonary edema events in women with HFpEF and more cardiogenic shock in women with HFrEF. A cautiously tailored approach is desperately needed for patients with HF who develop sepsis.

The utility of pulmonary function testing in the preoperative risk stratification of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: The role of pulmonary function testing (PFT) as a predictor of clinically relevant endpoints in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of PFT in the preoperative risk stratification of patients undergoing TAVR. METHODS: An evaluation of PFT (i.e., FEV1), arterial blood gases (i.e., PO2), the diagnosis of chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) by the Global Initiative for COPD (GOLD), and the diagnosis of chronic lung disease (CLD) by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) was performed to determine whether a relationship exists among these parameters and clinically relevant outcomes, including all-cause 30-day and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: A total of 513 patients underwent TAVR between March 2013 and December 2016. Per STS criteria, 269/513 (52%) had CLD with a mean FEV1 of 55.4 ± 12%. Per GOLD criteria, 158/513 (30%) of patients had COPD with a mean FEV1/forced vital capacity of 61.8 ± 8.2%. The severity of CLD was affected by changes in ejection fraction, albumin, creatinine, and B-type natriuretic peptide levels (p = .009, p < .001, p < .001, and p < .001, respectively), whereas the severity of COPD was not affected by these same variables, (p = .302, .079, .137, and .102, respectively). An increased A-a gradient (p = .035), increased PCO2 (p = .016), and decreased PO2 (p = <.001) demonstrated increased risk of 30-day mortality. Neither classification (COPD or CLD), nor PFT changes, showed association with 30-day and 1-year mortality (p = NS). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that isolated abnormalities in spirometry are a poor indicator of clinically relevant outcomes in TAVR. When classified correctly, COPD does not predict clinically relevant postoperative outcomes.

Long-term quality of life in octogenarians and nonagenarians with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation following WATCHMAN™ device implantation.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of WATCHMAN™ on quality of life (QoL) in octogenarians and nonagenarians. BACKGROUND: QoL after WATCHMAN™ device in the elderly remains unknown. METHODS: This is a prospective and retrospective cohort study of patients that underwent WATCHMAN™ implantation in a tertiary cardiovascular center from April 1, 2015 to September 27, 2017. The primary outcome was a prospective assessment of QoL via the SF-12v2 Health Survey (SF-12v2) in those aged ≥80 and ≥90 years. Secondary outcomes include major bleeding, stroke, vascular complications, pericardial effusion, device related thrombus (DRT), prolonged length of stay (LOS), acute kidney injury (AKI), and recurrent hospitalizations. RESULTS: This cohort of 151 patients included 48/151 (32%) females with a mean age of 80 ± 7.7 years. Mean CHA2 DS2 -VASc was 4.38 ± 1.36 and mean HAS-BLED was 3.27 ± 1.17. Octogenarians 65/81(80%) and nonagenarians 16/81(20%) comprised 81/151(54%) of patients (mean age 86 ± 4.3 years) from which 36/65 (55%) octogenarians and 10/16 (63%) nonagenarians completed SF-12v2 evaluation at 22 ± 10 and 30 ± 10-months. Octogenarians demonstrated enhanced physical component scores (PCS), and nonagenarians equal PCS versus the age-adjusted norm (45.43 ± 9.84 versus 38.68 ± 11.04, P = 0.0003, and 41.26 ± 12.36 versus 38.68 ± 11.04, P = 0.6463, respectively). The mental component scores (MCS) of octogenarians and nonagenarians remained comparable (51.80 ± 9.56 and 48.97 ± 9.92 versus 50.06 ± 10.94, respectively, P = 0.4659). No stroke, vascular complications, pericardial effusions, or readmissions related to WATCHMAN™ occurred. No difference among patients <80, ≥80, and ≥90 years was found in major bleeding events, DRT, prolonged LOS, or AKI (P = 0.0569, 0.116, 0.498, and 0.795, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Octogenarians and nonagenarians experience favorable long-term QoL after WATCHMAN™, with acceptable bleeding risk and low incidence of procedure-related complications.