Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Neural Eng ; 11(1): 016002, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24310982

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We investigate volume conduction effects in transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and present a guideline for efficient and yet accurate volume conductor modeling in tDCS using our newly-developed finite element (FE) approach. APPROACH: We developed a new, accurate and fast isoparametric FE approach for high-resolution geometry-adapted hexahedral meshes and tissue anisotropy. To attain a deeper insight into tDCS, we performed computer simulations, starting with a homogenized three-compartment head model and extending this step by step to a six-compartment anisotropic model. MAIN RESULTS: We are able to demonstrate important tDCS effects. First, we find channeling effects of the skin, the skull spongiosa and the cerebrospinal fluid compartments. Second, current vectors tend to be oriented towards the closest higher conducting region. Third, anisotropic WM conductivity causes current flow in directions more parallel to the WM fiber tracts. Fourth, the highest cortical current magnitudes are not only found close to the stimulation sites. Fifth, the median brain current density decreases with increasing distance from the electrodes. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results allow us to formulate a guideline for volume conductor modeling in tDCS. We recommend to accurately model the major tissues between the stimulating electrodes and the target areas, while for efficient yet accurate modeling, an exact representation of other tissues is less important. Because for the low-frequency regime in electrophysiology the quasi-static approach is justified, our results should also be valid for at least low-frequency (e.g., below 100 Hz) transcranial alternating current stimulation.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Cortex/physiology , Electric Stimulation/methods , Models, Anatomic , Anisotropy , Auditory Cortex/anatomy & histology , Auditory Cortex/physiology , Cerebrospinal Fluid/physiology , Computer Simulation , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Electrodes , Finite Element Analysis , Head , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Motor Cortex/anatomy & histology , Motor Cortex/physiology , Skull/anatomy & histology
2.
Phys Med Biol ; 58(14): 4881-96, 2013 Jul 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23787706

ABSTRACT

Volume conduction models can help in acquiring knowledge about the distribution of the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. One aspect of a detailed model is an accurate description of the cortical surface geometry. Since its estimation is difficult, it is important to know how accurate the geometry has to be represented. Previous studies only looked at the differences caused by neglecting the complete boundary between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and grey matter (Thielscher et al 2011 NeuroImage 54 234-43, Bijsterbosch et al 2012 Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 50 671-81), or by resizing the whole brain (Wagner et al 2008 Exp. Brain Res. 186 539-50). However, due to the high conductive properties of the CSF, it can be expected that alterations in sulcus width can already have a significant effect on the distribution of the electric field. To answer this question, the sulcus width of a highly realistic head model, based on T1-, T2- and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images, was altered systematically. This study shows that alterations in the sulcus width do not cause large differences in the majority of the electric field values. However, considerable overestimation of sulcus width produces an overestimation of the calculated field strength, also at locations distant from the target location.


Subject(s)
Electricity , Models, Biological , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Finite Element Analysis , Head , Magnetic Resonance Imaging
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...