Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 163(1): 302-306, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37198749

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) is a safe and effective alternative option for the management of first-trimester miscarriage, termination of pregnancy, or retained pregnancy tissue. Ireland's first MVA clinic was set up in the Rotunda Hospital in April 2020. OBJECTIVE: To identify the number of women who have undergone MVA since establishing our service, to assess the efficacy and safety of MVA in that service, and to develop local Irish studies that further support the safety of MVA, adding to the international body of evidence. METHODS: With the approval and assistance of the Clinical Audit Committee, we obtained a log of all patients who underwent MVA in the first 18 months of the service. We performed a retrospective electronic chart review using Maternal and Newborn Clinical Management System. We collected the data and preformed a descriptive analysis. RESULTS: In total, 86 women underwent MVA, 85 (98.8%) of which were successfully completed. There were no immediate procedural complications, inter-hospital transfers, or emergency electric vacuum aspiration (EVA) required. We obtained an incomplete evacuation rate of 4.7% (n = 4). CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that the MVA service in the Rotunda Hospital is a safe, effective management option with advantages for both the patient and the healthcare system. We recommend consideration for provision of funding and resources to enable expansion of this service nationally in order to give women greater autonomy of choice in the management of early pregnancy complications and termination of pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced , Abortion, Spontaneous , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Female , Humans , Vacuum Curettage , Retrospective Studies , Ireland , Pregnancy Trimester, First
2.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 266: 114-118, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34624739

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Manual Vacuum Aspiration (MVA) is a well-established management option for early pregnancy loss or early termination of pregnancy. MVA is performed as out-patient surgical procedure using local anaesthetic whereby aspiration of uterine contents is achieved through use of a hand-held negative pressure syringe. Ireland's first MVA service was established at the Rotunda Hospital Dublin in April 2020,. The purpose of this study was to gather feedback from women who had undergone MVA in the unit. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective mixed methods study of women attending for uterine aspiration under local anaesthetic from July to October 2020 in the unit. Consenting women were contacted one week following MVA via telephone. The survey conducted consisted of structured closed questions along with open-ended questions, to assess womens satisfaction in relation to all aspects of the MVA service. RESULTS: Nineteen women took part in the study, a response rate of 86.4%. Participants reported feeling well informed prior to attending for MVA. Prior to the procedure, pain expectation scores were high but actual reported pain scores were much lower. Although some participants did find MVA uncomfortable, the fact the procedure was very quick and the side effects so minimal generally negated this. The location and set up of the clinic scored highly among participants as did the staff of the clinic. Overall satisfaction with the MVA service was high with 84.2% of participants reporting they would opt again for MVA in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Women living in Ireland are interested and agreeable with having Manual Vacuum Aspiration as an available option for management of early pregnancy complications. Consideration should be given to expansion of MVA services nationally.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced , Abortion, Spontaneous , Abortion, Spontaneous/surgery , Anesthesia, Local , Female , Humans , Patient Satisfaction , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Vacuum Curettage/adverse effects
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30910445

ABSTRACT

Operative vaginal delivery (OVD) is commonly performed in the UK and Ireland. With skillful practice, the risks to mothers and babies are low. Caesarean section at full dilatation, particularly after failed OVD, can be more hazardous for mothers and babies. It is important to maintain and develop skills in OVD in order to provide it as a safe delivery option when the benefits outweigh the risks. As ultrasound machines have become more readily available on the labour ward, ultrasound assessment has been used to help clinicians diagnose the fetal head position and station, and also to try predict the success of the delivery. Simulation training has successfully been used in the setting of obstetric emergencies and is being developed to teach both technical and communication skills in OVD in order to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. In this chapter we will discuss strategies to improve the accuracy and safety of OVD in more details.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Delivery, Obstetric , Extraction, Obstetrical , Simulation Training , Contraindications, Procedure , Endosonography , Female , Humans , Labor Presentation , Obstetrical Forceps , Pregnancy , Ultrasonography, Prenatal
4.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 203: 225-8, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27343739

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Cold coagulation is recognised as a viable, cost-effective and successful treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), being used less frequently than excisional treatments for high grade lesions. We set out to demonstrate successful long term follow-up of patient with high grade CIN treated with cold coagulation. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective review over a one-year period of women with biopsy-proven CIN 2 and 3 who were treated with cold coagulation to the cervix, attending the colposcopy service of a large tertiary referral hospital. We examined follow-up cervical smear data for three years post treatment of low and high grade CIN, evaluated the success of treatment and re-treatment rates. RESULTS: 93 patients were included in our study, with 39 (41.9%) having CIN 1 and 54 (58.1%) diagnosed with CIN 2 or 3. Follow-up smears revealed low levels of recurrent high grade changes in both groups, with 31 (79.5%) of our CIN 1 group having a negative smear one year following treatment with cold coagulation, compared to 44 (81.1%) of patients with CIN 2 and 3. Successful primary treatment (i.e. no requirement for further treatment after 3 year follow-up) occurred in 33 (84.6%) of the CIN 1 group, and 42 (77.7%) of the CIN 2/3 group, demonstrating no statistical significance between re-treatment rates between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of cold coagulation for the treatment of high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. High success rates, and low re-treatment rates confirm that this is an acceptable primary treatment for CIN 2 and 3.


Subject(s)
Cervix Uteri/pathology , Cryosurgery/methods , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/surgery , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Female , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Young Adult , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology
5.
BJOG ; 122(4): 558-63, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25414081

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To identify risk factors and morbidity associated with suboptimal instrument placement at instrumental delivery. DESIGN: Observational study, nested within a randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Two university-affiliated maternity hospitals. SAMPLE: A cohort of 478 nulliparous women at term (≥37 weeks of gestation) undergoing instrumental delivery. METHODS: Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk factors for suboptimal application of vacuum or forceps, maternal and neonatal morbidity, and the sequential use of instruments, second operator, and caesarean section following failed instrumental delivery. RESULTS: Instrument placement was suboptimal in 138 of 478 (28.8%) deliveries. Factors associated with suboptimal instrument placement included fetal malposition (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.62-3.66), mid-cavity station (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.02-2.78), and forceps as the primary instrument (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.33-3.04). Compared with optimal instrument placement, suboptimal placement was associated with prolonged hospital stay (adjusted OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.30-4.02) and neonatal trauma (adjusted OR 4.25, 95% CI 1.85-9.72). Suboptimal placement was associated with a greater use of sequential instruments (adjusted OR 3.99, 95% CI 1.94-8.23) and caesarean section for failed instrumental delivery (adjusted OR 3.81, 95% CI 1.10-13.16). The mean decision to delivery interval (DDI) was 4 minutes longer in the suboptimal group (95% CI 2.1-5.9 minutes). CONCLUSIONS: Suboptimal instrument placement is associated with increased maternal and neonatal morbidity and procedural complications. Greater attention should be focused on instrument placement when training obstetricians for instrumental delivery.


Subject(s)
Birth Injuries/prevention & control , Clinical Competence/standards , Delivery, Obstetric/instrumentation , Extraction, Obstetrical/adverse effects , Extraction, Obstetrical/instrumentation , Obstetrical Forceps/adverse effects , Pregnancy Complications/prevention & control , Adult , Birth Injuries/etiology , Case-Control Studies , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Delivery, Obstetric/standards , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Labor Presentation , Logistic Models , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/etiology , Pregnancy Outcome , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical/adverse effects
8.
BJOG ; 121(8): 1029-38, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24720273

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of ultrasound can reduce the incidence of incorrect diagnosis of the fetal head position at instrumental delivery and subsequent morbidity. DESIGN: Two-arm, parallel, randomised trial, conducted from June 2011 to December 2012. SETTING: Two maternity hospitals in the Republic of Ireland. SAMPLE: A cohort of 514 nulliparous women at term (≥37 weeks of gestation) with singleton cephalic pregnancies, aiming to deliver vaginally, were recruited prior to an induction of labour or in early labour. METHODS: If instrumental delivery was required, women who had provided written consent were randomised to receive clinical assessment (standard care) or ultrasound scan and clinical assessment (ultrasound). [Correction added on 17 April 2014, after first online publication: Sentence was amended.] MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Incorrect diagnosis of the fetal head position. RESULTS: The incidence of incorrect diagnosis was significantly lower in the ultrasound group than the standard care group (4/257, 1.6%, versus 52/257, 20.2%; odds ratio 0.06; 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.19; P < 0.001). The decision to delivery interval was similar in both groups (ultrasound mean 13.8 minutes, SD 8.7 minutes, versus standard care mean 14.6 minutes, SD 10.1 minutes, P = 0.35). The incidence of maternal and neonatal complications, failed instrumental delivery, and caesarean section was not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: An ultrasound assessment prior to instrumental delivery reduced the incidence of incorrect diagnosis of the fetal head position without delaying delivery, but did not prevent morbidity. A more integrated clinical skills-based approach is likely to be required to prevent adverse outcomes at instrumental delivery.


Subject(s)
Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Extraction, Obstetrical/methods , Labor Presentation , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Adult , Decision Making , Female , Head/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Labor Stage, Second , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Standard of Care , Ultrasonography, Prenatal/methods
9.
J Obstet Gynaecol ; 31(6): 483-5, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21823843

ABSTRACT

The use of body mass index (BMI) for the diagnosis of obesity has limitations, especially when comparing ethnic groups with different body proportions. The aim of this prospective study was to compare maternal body composition in early pregnancy between Caucasian Irish and Indian women. A total of 81 Indian women and 81 Irish Caucasian women were matched for age, parity and BMI. Maternal weight and height were measured, and body composition analysed using bioelectrical impedance. The Irish women were taller and weighed more than the Indian women (p<0.001). At any given BMI, the Indian women had a higher total body fat percentage, visceral fat level and high fat percentage than the Irish women (p=0.024, 0.001 and 0.001, respectively). Our findings suggest that lower BMI cut-offs should be used for screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in Indian women attending our antenatal services.


Subject(s)
Asian People/ethnology , Body Composition/physiology , Pregnancy Trimester, First/physiology , White People/ethnology , Adult , Body Mass Index , Cohort Studies , Electric Impedance , Female , Humans , India/epidemiology , Ireland/epidemiology , Maternal Welfare , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...